OSA's Digital Library

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

| EXPLORING THE INTERFACE OF LIGHT AND BIOMEDICINE

  • Editors: Andrew Dunn and Anthony Durkin
  • Vol. 8, Iss. 3 — Apr. 4, 2013

Evaluation of Perceptual Resolution and Crosstalk in Stereoscopic Displays

Joo Dong Yun, Youngshin Kwak, and Seungjoon Yang

Journal of Display Technology, Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 106-111 (2013)


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (797 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations
  • Export Citation/Save Click for help

Abstract

Perceptual resolution and crosstalk of active and passive stereoscopic 3D displays are evaluated by subjective tests. Test patterns of gratings with various contrast and spatial frequencies are used to determine the contrast thresholds, from which the contrast sensitivity of human visual systems is obtained. Perceptual resolution tests show that viewers can perceive the highest vertical frequency on active displays, but not on passive displays. However, the contrast sensitivity is higher for passive displays than active displays for all other frequencies. Viewers can perceive frequency components with lower contrast, except for the highest frequency, more easily on passive displays than on active displays. Perceptual crosstalk tests show that interocular crosstalk is a function of spatial frequency. Crosstalk is lower on passive displays than on active displays.

© 2013 IEEE

Virtual Issues
Vol. 8, Iss. 3 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Joo Dong Yun, Youngshin Kwak, and Seungjoon Yang, "Evaluation of Perceptual Resolution and Crosstalk in Stereoscopic Displays," J. Display Technol. 9, 106-111 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/vjbo/abstract.cfm?URI=jdt-9-2-106


Sort:  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. G. D. Boreman, Modulation Transfer Function in Optical and Electro-Optical Systems (SPIE Press, 2001).
  2. S. Triantaphillidou, R. E. Jacobson, "Measurements of the modulation transfer function of image displays," Journal of Imaging Science and Technology 48, 58-65 (2004).
  3. C. Owsley, "Contrast sensitivity," Ophthalmol. Clin. N. Amer. 16, 171-177 (2003).
  4. M. J. Jenquin, "A bridge between modulation transfer function and minimum resolvable contrast," Proc. SPIE (1995) pp. 380-385.
  5. J. Kane, “3D Display resolution,” http://www.videoessentials.com/3D.php.
  6. J. S. Kim, M. S. Banks, "Effective spatial resolution of temporally and spatially interlaced stereo 3D televisions," 2012 SID Int. Symp. Seminar, and Exhibition (2012).
  7. A. Woods, "Understanding crosstalk in stereoscopic displays," Three-Dimensional Syst. Appl. Conf. (2010).
  8. R. M. Soneira, “3D TV display technology shoot-out,” http://www.displaymate.com/3D_TV_ShootOut_1.htm.
  9. W. Bloos, “Ghosting Test—Standard method for determining ghost image,” http://www.stereoforum.org/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=53.
  10. L. Wang, T. Kees, Y. Tu, L. Chen, P. Zhang, T. Zhang, I. Heynderickx, "Crosstalk evaluation in stereoscopic displays," Journal of Display Technology 7, 208-214 (2011).
  11. D.-H. Kang, E.-J. Lee, J.-H. Lee, J.-K. Song, "Perceptual strength of 3-D crosstalk in both achromatic and color images in stereoscopic 3-D displays," IEEE Trans. Image Process. 21, 32353-3261 (2012).
  12. L. Lipton, "Factors affecting hosting in time-multiplexed plano-stereoscopic CRT display systems," Proc. SPIE (1987) pp. 7578.
  13. R. Kaptein, I. Heynderickx, "Effect of crosstalk in multi-view autostereoscopic 3D displays on perceived image quality," SID Symp. Dig. (2007) pp. 12201223.
  14. A. Woods, S. Tan, "Characterising sources of ghosting in time-sequential stereoscopic video displays," Proc. SPIE (2001) pp. 6677.
  15. Y. Yoshihara, H. Ujike, T. Tanabe, "3D crosstalk of stereoscopic (3-D) display using patterned retarder and corresponding glasses," Proc. IDW (2008) pp. 11351138.
  16. A. Michelson, Studies in Optics (Univ. Chicago Press, 1927).
  17. S. A. Julious, "Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study," Pharmac. Statist. 4, 287291 (2005).

Cited By

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited