OSA's Digital Library

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics


  • Editor: Gregory W. Faris
  • Vol. 3, Iss. 1 — Jan. 29, 2008

Selection of image fusion quality measures: objective, subjective, and metric assessment

Timothy D. Dixon, Eduardo Fernández Canga, Stavri G. Nikolov, Tom Troscianko, Jan M. Noyes, C. Nishan Canagarajah, and Dave R. Bull  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 24, Issue 12, pp. B125-B135 (2007)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (829 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Accurate quality assessment of fused images, such as combined visible and infrared radiation images, has become increasingly important with the rise in the use of image fusion systems. We bring together three approaches, applying two objective tasks (local target analysis and global target location) to two scenarios, together with subjective quality ratings and three computational metrics. Contrast pyramid, shift-invariant discrete wavelet transform, and dual-tree complex wavelet transform fusion are applied, as well as levels of JPEG2000 compression. The differing tasks are shown to be more or less appropriate for differentiating among fusion methods, and future directions pertaining to the creation of task-specific metrics are explored.

© 2007 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(110.4190) Imaging systems : Multiple imaging
(330.5510) Vision, color, and visual optics : Psychophysics

Original Manuscript: March 9, 2007
Revised Manuscript: July 12, 2007
Manuscript Accepted: July 20, 2007
Published: October 11, 2007

Virtual Issues
Vol. 3, Iss. 1 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Timothy D. Dixon, Eduardo Fernández Canga, Stavri G. Nikolov, Tom Troscianko, Jan M. Noyes, C. Nishan Canagarajah, and Dave R. Bull, "Selection of image fusion quality measures: objective, subjective, and metric assessment," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24, B125-B135 (2007)

Sort:  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. A. Toet, J. IJspeert, A. M. Waxman, and M. Aguilar, "Fusion of visible and thermal imagery improves situational awareness," Displays 18, 85-95 (1997). [CrossRef]
  2. E. A. Essock, J. S. McCarley, M. J. Sinai, and J. K. DeFord, "Human perception of sensor-fused imagery," in Interpreting Remote Sensing Imagery: Human Factors, R.R.Hoffman and A.B.Markman, eds. (CRC, 2001), pp. 137-182.
  3. T. D. Dixon, E. F. Canga, S. G. Nikolov, T. Troscianko, J. M. Noyes, D. R. Bull, and C. N. Canagarajah, "Quality assessment of false-colored fused images," J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 14, 883-894 (2006). [CrossRef]
  4. T. D. Dixon, E. F. Canga, J. M. Noyes, T. Troscianko, S. G. Nikolov, D. R. Bull, and C. N. Canagarajah, "Methods for the assessment of fused images," ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 3, 309-332 (2006). [CrossRef]
  5. G. Qu, D. Zhang, and P. Yan, "Information measure for performance of image fusion," Electron. Lett. 38, 313-315 (2002). [CrossRef]
  6. V. S. Petrovic and C. S. Xydeas, "Sensor noise effects on signal-level image fusion performance," Inf. Fusion 4, 167-183 (2003). [CrossRef]
  7. G. Piella, "New quality measures for image fusion," in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information Fusion (Academic, 2004), pp. 542-546.
  8. H. Li, B. S. Manjunath, and S. K. Mitra, "Multisensor image fusion using the wavelet transform," CVGIP: Graph. Models Image Process. 57, 235-245 (1995). [CrossRef]
  9. A. Toet, "Multiscale contrast enhancement with applications to image fusion," Opt. Eng. (Bellingham) 31, 1026-1031 (1992). [CrossRef]
  10. O. Rockinger, "Image sequence fusion using a shift-invariant wavelet transform," in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (IEEE, 1997), pp. 288-291. [CrossRef]
  11. N. G. Kingsbury, "Complex wavelets for shift invariant analysis and filtering of signals," Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 10, 234-253 (2001). [CrossRef]
  12. T. Wilson, S. Rogers, and L. R. Meyers, "Perceptual based hyperspectral image fusion using multispectral analysis," Opt. Eng. (Bellingham) 34, 3154-3164 (1995). [CrossRef]
  13. S. G. Nikolov, P. Hill, D. R. Bull, and C. N. Canagarajah, "Wavelets for image fusion," in Wavelets in Signal and Image Analysis, A.Petrosian and F.Meyer, eds. (Academic, 2001), pp. 213-244.
  14. D. Taubman and M. Marcellin, JPEG2000: Image Compression Fundamentals, Standards and Practice (Academic, 2002). [CrossRef]
  15. D. Santa-Cruz, R. Grosbois, and T. Ebrahimi, "JPEG 2000 performance evaluation and assessment," Signal Process. 17, 113-130 (2002).
  16. A. N. Skodras, C. A. Christopoulos, and T. Ebrahimi, "JPEG2000: the upcoming still image compression standard," Pattern Recogn. Lett. 22, 1337-1345 (2001). [CrossRef]
  17. A. M. Eskiciouglu, "Quality measurement for monochrome compressed images in the past 25 years," in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (IEEE, 2000), pp. 1907-1910.
  18. A. Loza, T. D. Dixon, E. F. Canga, S. G. Nikolov, D. R. Bull, C. N. Canagarajah, J. M. Noyes, and T. Troscianko, "Methods of fused image analysis and assessment," in Advances and Challenges in Multisensor Data and Information Processing, NATO Security through Science Series (IOS Press, 2007).
  19. Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli, "Image quality assessment: from error measurement to structural similarity," IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13, 600-612 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Comité Consultatif International Radio (CCIR), Method for the Subjective Assessment of the Quality of Television Pictures, CCIR Recommendation 500-3 (CCIR, 1986).
  21. Radiocummunication Sector (ITU-R), Methodology for the Subjective Assessment of the Quality of Television Picture, ITU-R Recommendation BT.500-10 (ITU-R, 2000).
  22. N. Anderson, "Algebraic models in perception," in Handbook of Perception: Psychophysical Judgement and Measurement, E.Carterette and M.Friedman, eds. (Academic, 1974), pp. 216-298.
  23. L. L. Thurstone, "A law of comparative judgement," Psychol. Rev. 34, 273-286 (1927). [CrossRef]
  24. B. C. Hansen and E. A. Essock, "The relationship between human perceptual performance and the physical attributes of night vision imagery," in Trends in Experimental Psychology Research, D.T.Rosen, R.S.Kozak, G.K.Carlson, M.R.Tyler, and S.V.Joist, eds. (Nova, 2005), pp. 37-66.
  25. T. D. Dixon, S. G. Nikolov, J. J. Lewis, J. Li, E. F. Canga, J. M. Noyes, T. Troscianko, D. R. Bull, and C. N. Canagarajah, "Assessment of fused videos using scanpaths: a comparison of data analysis methods," Spatial Vis. 20, 437-466 (2007). [CrossRef]
  26. Cedrus, SuperLab Pro Version 2.0 (1999), availeble at http://wwwSuperlab.com/.
  27. K. Tiippana, R. Nasanen, and J. Rovamo, "Contrast matching of two-dimensional compound gratings," Vision Res. 34, 1157-1163 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. A. van Dijk and J. Martens, "Subjective quality assessment of compressed images," Signal Process. 58, 235-252 (1997). [CrossRef]
  29. F. M. Felisberti, J. A. Solomon, and M. J. Morgan, "The role of target salience in crowding," Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 34, 823-833 (2005).
  30. Y. Zheng, E. A. Essock, B. C. Hansen, and A. M. Haun, "A new metric based on extended spatial frequency and its application to DWT based fusion algorithms," Inf. Fusion 8, 177-192 (2007). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited