OSA's Digital Library

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

| EXPLORING THE INTERFACE OF LIGHT AND BIOMEDICINE

  • Editor: Gregory W. Faris
  • Vol. 2, Iss. 5 — May. 17, 2007

Efficiency of the human observer for detecting a Gaussian signal at a known location in non-Gaussian distributed lumpy backgrounds

Subok Park, Brandon D. Gallas, Aldo Badano, Nicholas A. Petrick, and Kyle J. Myers  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 24, Issue 4, pp. 911-921 (2007)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.24.000911


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (898 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

A previous study [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 22, 3 (2005)] has shown that human efficiency for detecting a Gaussian signal at a known location in non-Gaussian distributed lumpy backgrounds is approximately 4%. This human efficiency is much less than the reported 40% efficiency that has been documented for Gaussian-distributed lumpy backgrounds [ J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 694 (1999) and J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 473 (2001) ]. We conducted a psychophysical study with a number of changes, specifically in display-device calibration and data scaling, from the design of the aforementioned study. Human efficiency relative to the ideal observer was found again to be approximately 5%. Our variance analysis indicates that neither scaling nor display made a statistically significant difference in human performance for the task. We conclude that the non-Gaussian distributed lumpy background is a major factor in our low human-efficiency results.

© 2007 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.5510) Vision, color, and visual optics : Psychophysics
(330.6100) Vision, color, and visual optics : Spatial discrimination

ToC Category:
Vision and color

History
Original Manuscript: March 3, 2006
Revised Manuscript: November 22, 2006
Manuscript Accepted: November 28, 2006
Published: March 14, 2007

Virtual Issues
Vol. 2, Iss. 5 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Subok Park, Brandon D. Gallas, Aldo Badano, Nicholas A. Petrick, and Kyle J. Myers, "Efficiency of the human observer for detecting a Gaussian signal at a known location in non-Gaussian distributed lumpy backgrounds," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24, 911-921 (2007)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/vjbo/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-24-4-911


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. H. L. Van Trees, Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory Part I (Academic, 1968).
  2. M. A. Kupinski, J. W. Hoppin, E. Clarkson, and H. H. Barrett, "Ideal-observer computation in medical imaging with use of Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20, 430-438 (2003). [CrossRef]
  3. S. Park, M. A. Kupinski, E. Clarkson, and H. H. Barrett, "Ideal-observer performance under signal and background uncertainty," in Information Processing in Medical Imaging, Vol. 2732 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, C. J. Taylor and J. A. Noble, eds. (Springer-Verlag, 2003) pp. 342-353.
  4. H. H. Barrett and K. J. Myers, Foundations of Image Science (Wiley, 2004).
  5. B. D. Gallas and H. H. Barrett, "Validating the use of channels to estimate the ideal linear observer," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20, 1725-1738 (2003). [CrossRef]
  6. D. H. Hubel and T. N. Wiesel, "Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex," J. Physiol. (London) 160, 106-154 (1962).
  7. J. G. Robson, "Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity functions of the visual system," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 1141-1142 (1966). [CrossRef]
  8. C. K. Abbey and H. H. Barrett, "Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 473-488 (2001). [CrossRef]
  9. H. H. Barrett, J. Yao, J. P. Holland, and K. J. Myers, "Model observers for assessment of image quality," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 9758-9765 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. A. E. Burgess, X. Li, and C. K. Abbey, "Visual signal detectability with two noise components: anomalous masking effects," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 2420-2442 (1997). [CrossRef]
  11. A. E. Burgess, "Visual signal detectability with two-component noise: low-pass spectrum effects," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 694-704 (1999). [CrossRef]
  12. A. E. Burgess, F. L. Jacobson, and P. F. Judy, "Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise," Med. Phys. 28, 419-437 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. F. O. Bochud, C. K. Abbey, and M. P. Eckstein, "Search for lesions in mammograms: statistical characterization of observer responses," Med. Phys. 31, 24-36 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. S. Park, E. Clarkson, M. A. Kupinski, and H. H. Barrett, "Efficiency of the human observer detecting random signals in random backgrounds," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 22, 3-16 (2005). [CrossRef]
  15. S. Park, E. Clarkson, M. A. Kupinski, and H. H. Barrett, "Efficiency of human and model observers for signal-detection tasks in non-Gaussian distributed lumpy backgrounds," Proc. SPIE 5749, 138-149 (2005). [CrossRef]
  16. J. P. Rolland and H. H. Barrett, "Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 649-658 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. B. D. Gallas, "One-shot estimate of MRMC variance: AUC," Acad. Radiol. 13, 353-362 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. D. M. Green and J. A. Swets, Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics (Wiley, 1966).
  19. H. H. Barrett, C. K. Abbey, and E. Clarkson, "Objective assessment of image quality III: ROC metrics, ideal observers, and likelihood-generating functions," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 1520-1535 (1998). [CrossRef]
  20. A. E. Burgess, R. F. Wagner, R. J. Jennings, and H. B. Barlow, "Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination," Science 214, 93-94 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. W. P. Tanner and T. G. Birdsall, "Definitions of d? and ? as psychophysical measures," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 30, 922-928 (1958). [CrossRef]
  22. A. E. Burgess, "The Rose model, revisited," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 633-646 (1999). [CrossRef]
  23. A. Badano and M. J. Flynn, "Method for measuring veiling glare in high performance display devices," Appl. Opt. 13, 2059-2066 (2000).
  24. A. Badano and D. H. Fifadara, "Comparison of Fourier-optics, telescopic, and goniometric methods for measuring angular emissions from medical liquid-crystal displays," Appl. Opt. 26, 4999-5005 (2004). [CrossRef]
  25. F. A. Wichmann and N. J. Hill, "The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit," Percept. Psychophys. 63, 1314-1329 (2001). [CrossRef]
  26. F. A. Wichmann and N. J. Hill, "The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling," Percept. Psychophys. 63, 1314-1329 (2001). [CrossRef]
  27. F. Shen and E. Clarkson, "Using Fisher information to approximate ideal-observer performance on detection tasks for lumpy-background images," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23, 2406-2414 (2006). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited