OSA's Digital Library

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

| EXPLORING THE INTERFACE OF LIGHT AND BIOMEDICINE

  • Editor: Gregory W. Faris
  • Vol. 2, Iss. 6 — Jun. 13, 2007

Image, eye, and retina (invited review)

Nicholas J. Wade  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 24, Issue 5, pp. 1229-1249 (2007)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.24.001229


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1673 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Advances in understanding the initial stages of the visual process have been made over the centuries. This heritage will be reviewed with respect to the passage of light through the eye, as well as its gross anatomy and microscopic structure. The links between image formation in the camera and the eye were integrated with the anatomy of the eye in the seventeenth century. They drew attention to the problem of accommodation and to corrections for errors of refraction. Investigations of the structure of the retina were to await the invention of achromatic microscopes in the early nineteenth century. An armory of devices for examining vision and the eye were to follow later in the century. These transformed the study of vision from an observational to an experimental discipline.

© 2007 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.0330) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision, color, and visual optics

History
Original Manuscript: July 28, 2006
Manuscript Accepted: September 27, 2006
Published: April 11, 2007

Virtual Issues
Vol. 2, Iss. 6 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Nicholas J. Wade, "Image, eye, and retina (invited review)," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24, 1229-1249 (2007)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/vjbo/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-24-5-1229


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. G. B. Porta, Magiae Naturalis Libri XX (Salviani,1589).
  2. J. B. Porta, Natural Magick (Young and Speed,1658).
  3. J. Waterhouse, 'Camera obscura,' in Encyclopaedia Britannica, 10th ed. (Adams and Charles, 1902), Vol. 26, pp. 516-518.
  4. D. C. Lindberg, 'Alhazen's theory of vision and its reception in the West,' Isis 58, 321-341 (1967).
  5. D. C. Lindberg, Theories of Vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler (University of Chicago, 1976).
  6. D. C. Lindberg, Studies in the History of Medieval Optics (Variorum Reprints, 1983).
  7. G. A. Russell, 'Ibn al-Haytham--the first biophysicist,' Trends Neurosci. 2, IX-XI (1979).
  8. A.T.Sabra, trans, and ed., The Optics of Ibn Al-Haytham. Books I-III. On Direct Vision (The Warburg Institute, 1989).
  9. E. H. Schmitz, Handbuch zur Geschichte der Optik. Von der Antike bis Newton (Wayenborgh, 1981), Vol. 1.
  10. A. M. Smith, Alhacen's Theory of Visual Perception (American Philosophical Society, 2001).
  11. N. Ferrero, 'Leonardo da Vinci: of the eye,' Am. J. Ophthalmol. 35, 507-521 (1952).
  12. J. P. McMurrich, Leonardo da Vinci the Anatomist (1452-1519) (Williams & Wilkins, 1930).
  13. D. S. Strong, Leonardo on the Eye (Garland, 1979).
  14. J. B. Porta, De Refractione. Optices Porte. Libri Novem. (Carlinum and Pacem, 1593).
  15. W. Porterfield, A Treatise on the Eye, the Manner and Phonomena of Vision (Hamilton and Balfour, 1759).
  16. V. Ronchi, The Nature of Light. An Historical Survey, V.Barocas, trans. (Heinemann, 1970).
  17. N. J. Wade, A Natural History of Vision (MIT, 1998).
  18. F. Platter, De corporis humani structura et usu. Libri III (König, 1583).
  19. J. Kepler, Ad Vitellionem Paralipomena (Marinium and Aubrii, 1604).
  20. A. C. Crombie, 'Kepler: de modo visionis,' in Mélange Alexandre Koyré I. L'Aventure de la Science (Hermann, 1964), pp. 135-172.
  21. A. M. Smith, 'What is the history of medieval optics really about?' Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 148, 180-194 (2004).
  22. J. A. Vollgraff, 'Snellius' notes on the reflection and refraction of rays,' Osiris 1, 718-725 (1936).
  23. C. Scheiner, Oculus, hoc est fundamentum opticum (Agricola, 1619).
  24. F. Daxecker, 'Christoph Scheiner's eye studies,' Doc. Ophthalmol. 81, 27-35 (1992).
  25. F. Daxecker, 'Further studies by Christoph Scheiner concerning the optics of the eye,' Doc. Ophthalmol. 86, 153-161 (1994).
  26. F. Daxecker, The Physicist and Astronomer Christopher Scheiner. Biography, Letters, Works (Leopold-Franzens-University of Innsbruck, 2004).
  27. C. Scheiner, Rosa Ursina (Phaeum, 1630).
  28. J. Kepler, Dioptrice (Franci, 1611).
  29. E. H. Schmitz, Handbuch zur Geschichte der Optik. Von Newton bis Fraunhofer (Wayenborgh, 1982), Vol. 2.
  30. E. H. Schmitz, Handbuch zur Geschichte der Optik. Die Brille (Wayenborgh, 1995), Suppl. Vol. 3, Pt. A.
  31. A. M. Smith, 'Ptolemy, Alhazen, and Kepler and the problem of optical images,' Arabic Sci. Philos. 8, 9-44 (1998).
  32. V. llardi, 'The role of Florence in the development and commerce of spectacles,' Atti Fond. Giorgio Ronchi 56, 163-176 (2001).
  33. W. Porterfield, 'An essay concerning the motions of our eyes. Part 2. Of their internal motions,' Edin. Med. Ess. Obs. 4, 124-294 (1738).
  34. N. J. Wade, 'Porterfield and Wells on the motions of our eyes,' Perception 29, 21-239 (2000).
  35. N. J. Wade and S. Finger, 'The eye as an optical instrument. From camera obscura to Helmholtz's perspective,' Perception 30, 1157-1177 (2001).
  36. T. Young, 'On the mechanism of the eye,' Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 91, 23-88 (1801).
  37. R. Descartes, Le Discours de la Méthode pour bien conduire le raison et chercher la vérités dans les sciences (Paris, 1637).
  38. R. Descartes, 'La Dioptrique,' in Oeuvres de Descartes, Vol. 6, C.Adam and P.Tannery, eds. (Cerf, 1637/1902), pp. 81-228.
  39. R. Descartes, Discourse on Method, Optics, Geometry, and Meteorology, P.J.Olscamp, trans. (Bobbs-Merrill,1965).
  40. N. J. Wade, 'Light and sight since antiquity,' Perception 27, 637-670 (1998).
  41. N. Malebranche, De la Recherche de la Vérité, 6th ed. (Pralard, 1712).
  42. N. Malebranche, The Search after Truth, T.M.Lennon and P.J.Olscamp, trans. (Ohio State University, 1980).
  43. W. C. Wells, An Essay upon Single Vision with Two Eyes: Together with Experiments and Observations on Several Other Subjects in Optics (Cadell, 1792).
  44. N. J. Wade, Destined for Distinguished Oblivion: The Scientific Vision of William Charles Wells (1757-1817) (Kluwer/Plenum, 2003).
  45. J. Purkinje, De Examine Physiologico Organi Visus et Systematis Cutanei (Breslau, 1823).
  46. H. J. John, Jan Evangelista Purkyne. Czech Scientist and Patriot. 1787-1869 (American Philosophical Society, 1959), p. 61.
  47. N. J. Wade and J. Brozek, Purkinje's Vision: The Dawning of Neuroscience (Erlbaum, 2001).
  48. N. J. Wade, J. Brozek, and J. Hoskovec, 'Images of Purkinje's vision,' Hist. Philos. Psychol. 4, 1-9 (2002).
  49. W. C. Wells, 'Observations and experiments on vision,' Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 101, 378-391 (1811).
  50. J. Purkinje, Beobachtungen und Versuche zur Physiologie der Sinne. Neue Beiträge zur Kenntniss des Sehens in subjectiver Hinsicht (Reimer, 1825).
  51. A. Cramer, Het Accommodatie-Vermogen, Physiologisch Toegelicht (Loosjes, 1853).
  52. I. den Tonkelaar, H. E. Henkes, and G. K. Leersum, 'Antonie Cramer's explanation of accommodation,' Doc. Ophthalmol. 74, 87-93 (1990).
  53. H. Helmholtz, 'Ueber die Accommodation des Auges,' Arch. Ophthalmol. 1, 1-74 (1855).
  54. H. Helmholtz, Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics.J.P. C.Southall, trans. (Optical Society of America, 1924), Vol. 1.
  55. H. Helmholtz, Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics, 3 vols., J.P. C.Southall, trans. (Thoemmes, 2000).
  56. T. Haugwitz, 'Optical instruments,' in Hirschberg's History of Ophthalmology (Wayenborgh, 1986), Vol. 11, p. 2.
  57. R. F. Heitz, 'The history of contact lenses. Volume one. Early neutralizations of the corneal dioptric power,' in Hirschberg's History of Opnthalmology, C.Mailer, trans. (Wayenborgh, 2003), Vol. 11, Pt. 3-a.
  58. J. Hirschberg, The History of Ophthalmology. The Reform of Ophthalmology (Part Two), F.C.Blodi, trans. (Wayenborgh, 1984), Vol. 4.
  59. F. Pourfour du Petit, 'Différentes manières de connoître le grandeur des chambres de l'humeur aqueuse de l'homme,' Mém. Acad. R. Sci. 1753, 289-300. (Orig. pub. 1728.)
  60. H. Helmholtz, Beschreibung eines Augenspiegels zur Untersuchung der Netzhaut in lebenden Auge (Förstner, 1851).
  61. H. Helmholtz, The Description of an Ophthalmoscope: Being an English Translation of von Helmholtz's 'Beschreibung eines Augenspiegels' (Berlin, 1851), T.H.Shastrid, trans. (Cleveland Press, 1916).
  62. J. Méry, 'Des mouvemens de l'iris et par occasion de la partie principale de l'organe de la vûë,' Hist. Acad. R. Sci. 23, 277-284 (1704).
  63. J. E. Purkinje, Opera Omnia, K.J.Lhotak, ed. (Society of Czech Physicians, 1918), Vol. 1.
  64. R. Weale, 'On the invention of the ophthalmoscope,' Doc. Ophthalmol. 86, 163-166 (1994).
  65. H. Friedenwald, 'The history of the invention and of the development of the ophthalmoscope,' J. Am. Med. Assoc. 38, 549-552 (1902).
  66. C. R. Keeler, 'Babbage the unfortunate,' Br. J. Ophthamol. 88, 730-732 (2004).
  67. P. J. Koehler, 'The historical roots of the visual examination,' Semin Neurol. 22, 357-366 (2002).
  68. F. C. Donders, On the Anomalies of Accommodation and Refraction of the Eye, W.D.Moore, trans. (New Sydenham Society, 1864).
  69. J. Wardrop, Essays on the Morbid Anatomy of the Human Eye (Archibald Constable, 1818), Vol. 2.
  70. H. Helmholtz, Popular Lectures on Scientific Subjects. Second series with an autobiography of the author, E.Atkinson, trans. (Longmans, 1895).
  71. J. Hirschberg, The History of Ophthalmology. The Renaissance of Ophthalmology in the Eighteenth Century (Part One-a)F.C.Blodi, trans. (Wayenborgh, 1992), Vol. 4.
  72. L. Koenigsberger, Hermann von Helmholtz, F.A.Welby, trans (Clarendon, 1906).
  73. C. T. G. Ruete, Der Augenspiegel und das Optometer (Göttingen, 1852).
  74. B. Newhall, The History of Photography from 1839 to the Present (Seeker & Warburg, 1982).
  75. L. J. Schaaf, Out of the Shadows. Herschel, Talbot and the Invention of Photography (Yale U. Press, 1992).
  76. N. J. Wade, 'Charles Wheatstone (1802-1875),' Perception 31, 265-272 (2002).
  77. N. J. Wade, 'Accentuating the negative: Tom Wedgwood (1771-1805), perception and photography,' Perception 34, 513-520 (2005).
  78. W. T. Jackman and J. D. Webster, 'On photographing the retina of the living human eye,' Philadelphia Photographer 23, 340-341 (1886).
  79. A. Roorda, 'Adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy,' J. Refract. Surg. 16, S602-S607, (2000).
  80. H. W. Babcock, 'The possibility of compensating astronomical seeing,' Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 65, 229-236 (1953). [CrossRef]
  81. A. W. Dreher, J. F. Billie, and R. N. Weinreb, 'Active optical depth resolution improvement of the laser tomographic scanner,' Appl. Opt. 28, 804-808 (1989).
  82. J.Porter, H.Queener, J.Lin, K.Thorn, and A.Awwal, eds., Adaptive Optics for Vision Science: Principles, Practices, Design and Applications (Wiley, 2006).
  83. J. S. Wolffsohn and R. C. Peterson, 'Anterior ophthalmic imaging,' Clin. Exp. Optom. 89, 205-214 (2006).
  84. A. Gullstrand, 'Die reflexlose Ophthalmoskopie,' Arch. Augenheilkd. 78, 101 (1911).
  85. T. Haugwitz, 'Ophthalmology in the German-speaking countries during the 20th century,' in Hirschberg's History of Ophthalmology, F.C.Blodi and D.L.Blanchard, trans. (Wayenborgh, 1994), Vol. 11, p. 3-d.
  86. J. Hirschberg, The History of Ophthalmology. Antiquity, F.C.Blodi, trans. (Wayenborgh, 1982), Vol. 1.
  87. J. M. Enoch, 'Early lens use; lenses found in context with their original objects,' Optom. Vision Sci. 73, 707-715 (1996).
  88. J. Hirschberg, The History of Ophthalmology. The Middle Ages; The Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, F.C.Blodi, trans. (Wayenborgh, 1985), Vol. 2.
  89. B. Lingelbach and O. Schmidt, 'Asphärische Linsen aus dem 11. Jahrhundert,' Z. Prakt. Augenheilkd. 23, 397-406 (2002).
  90. O. Schmidt, K.-H. Wilms, and B. Lingelbach, 'The Visby lenses,' Optom. Vision Sci. 76, 624-630 (1999).
  91. E. Hill, 'History of eyeglasses and spectacles,' in The American Encyclopedia and Dictionary of Ophthalmology, C.A.Wood, ed. (Cleveland Press, 1915), Vol. 7, pp. 4894-4953.
  92. E. Rosen, 'The invention of eyeglasses,' J. Hist. Med. 11, 13-46, 183-218 (1956).
  93. E. H. Schmitz, Handbuch zur Geschichte der Optik. Das Mikroskop (Wayenborgh, 1989), Suppl. Vol. 2, Pt. A.
  94. E. H. Schmitz, Handbuch zur Geschichte der Optik. Die Brille (Wayenborgh, 1995), Suppl. Vol. 3, Pt. A.
  95. E. H. Schmitz, Handbuch zur Geschichte der Optik. Die Brille (Wayenborgh, 1995), Suppl. Vol. 3, Pt. B.
  96. E. H. Schmitz, Handbuch zur Geschichte der Optik. Die Brille (Wayenborgh, 1995), Suppl. Vol. 3, Pt. C.
  97. R. F. Heitz, 'The history of contact lenses. Volume two. Keratoconus and the use of early contact lenses (1888-1920),' in Hirschberg's History of Ophthalmology, C.Mailer, trans. (Wayenborgh, 2005), Vol. 11, pt. 3-6.
  98. I. Newton, Opticks: or, a Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections and Colours of Light (Smith and Walford, 1704).
  99. J. Hirschberg, The History of Ophthalmology. The Renaissance of Ophthalmology in the Eighteenth Century (Part Three). The First Half of the Nineteenth Century (Part One), F.C.Blodi, trans. (Wayenborgh, Bonn, 1984), Vol. 3.
  100. J. Hirschberg, The History of Ophthalmology. The Renaissance of Ophthalmology in the Eighteenth Century (Part Three). The First Half of the Nineteenth Century (Part One), F.C.Blodi, trans. (Wayenborgh, 1985), Vol. 5.
  101. J. H. Sutcliffe, 'One-position ophthalmometry,' Trans. Ophthalmol. Soc. U. K. 8, 74-102 (1907).
  102. G. B. Airy, 'On a peculiar defect in the eye, and a mode of correcting it,' Edin. J. Sci. 7, 322-325 (1827).
  103. D. Brewster, 'Observations by the editor,' Edin. J. Sci 7, 325-326 (1827).
  104. D. M. Albert and D. D. Edwards, eds., The History of Ophthalmology (Blackwell Science, 1996).
  105. P. E. Runge, 'Eduard Jaeger's test-types (Schrift-Scalen) and the historical development of vision tests,' Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc. 98, 357-438 (2000).
  106. H. E. Burton, 'The Optics of Euclid,' J. Opt. Soc. Am. 35, 357-372 (1945).
  107. A. Lejeune, Euclide et Ptolémée. Deux Stades de L'Optique Geométrique Grecque (Université de Louvain, 1948).
  108. A.Lejeune, ed., L'Optique de Claude Ptolémée dans la version Latine d'après l'Arabe de l'Émir Eugène de Sicile (Université de Louvain, 1956).
  109. A. M. Smith, Ptolemy's Theory of Visual Perception: An English Translation of the Optics with Introduction and Commentary (The American Philosophical Society, 1996).
  110. B. Daça de Valdes, Uso de los Antoios (Perez, 1623).
  111. A.I.Sabra, trans. and ed., The Optics of Ibn Al-Haytham. Books I-III. On Direct Vision (The Warburg Institute, 1989).
  112. J. Harris, A Treatise of Optics: Containing Elements of the Science; in Two Books (White, 1775).
  113. N. J. Wade, 'Scanning the seen: vision and the origins of eye movement research,' in Eye Movements: A Window on Mind and Brain, R.P. G.van Gompel, M.H.Fischer, W.S.Murray, and R.L.Hill, eds. (Elsevier, 2007), pp. 31-61.
  114. H. Aubert, 'Über die Grenzen der Farben-Wahrnehmung auf den seitlichen Theilen der Netzhaut,' Arch. Ophthalmol. 3, 38-67 (1857).
  115. D. Brewster, Letters on Natural Magic Addressed to Sir Walter Scott, Bart (John Murray, 1832).
  116. J. F. W. Herschel, A Treatise on Astronomy (Longman, 1833).
  117. M. Mersenne, L 'Optique et la Catoptrique (Langlois, 1651).
  118. T. Birch, The History of the Royal Society of London (Millar, 1757), Vol. 3.
  119. R. Hooke, Animadversions on the First Part of the Machina Coelestis of the Honourable, Learned, and Deservedly Famous Astronomer Johannes Hevelius, Consul of Dantzick, Together with an Explication of Some Instruments (Martyn, 1674).
  120. R. Hooke, The Posthumous Works of Robert Hooke, M.D. (Waller, 1705).
  121. N. J. Wade, 'Visual neuroscience before the neuron,' Perception 33, 869-889 (2004).
  122. W. Porterfield, 'An essay concerning the motions of our eyes. Part 1. Of their external motions,' Edin. Med. Ess. Obs. 3, 160-263 (1737).
  123. R. Smith, A Compleat System of Opticks in Four Books (pub. by author, Cambridge, 1738).
  124. R. Smith, A Compleat System of Opticks (Thoemmes Continuum, 2004).
  125. J. Jurin, 'An essay on distinct and indistinct vision,' in A Compleat System of Opticks in Four Books, R.Smith, ed. (Cambridge, 1738), Vol. 2 pp. 115-171.
  126. A. Volkmann, Neue Beiträge zur Physiologie des Gesichtssinnes (Breitkopf and Härtel, 1836).
  127. A. Volkmann, 'Sehen,' in Handwörterbuch der Physiologie mit Rücksicht auf physiologische Pathologie, R.Wagner, ed. (Vieweg, 1846): Vol. 3, pt.1, pp. 265-351.
  128. N. J. Wade and B. W. Tatler, The Moving Tablet of the Eye. The Origins of Modern Eye Movement Research (Oxford U. Press, 2005).
  129. T. Mayer, 'Experimenta circa visus aciem,' Commentarii Societatis Regiae Scientiarum Gottingensis 4, 97-112 (1755).
  130. E. Scheerer, 'Tobias Mayer--experiments on visual acuity (1755),' Spatial Vis. 2, 81-97 (1987).
  131. A. Hueck, Die Bewegung der Krystillinse (Kluge, 1839).
  132. A. Volkmann, Physiologische Untersuchungen im Gebiete der Optik (Breitkopf and Härtel, 1862).
  133. G. Westheimer, 'Visual acuity and hyperacuity,' Invest. Ophthalmol. 14, 570-572 (1975).
  134. M. J. Morgan, 'Hyperacuity,' in Vision and Visual Dysfunction. Volume 10. Spatial Vision, D.Regan, ed. (Macmillan, 1991), pp. 87-113.
  135. A. Colenbrander, 'Measuring vision and vision loss,' in Duane's Clinical Ophthalmology, W.Tasman and E.A.Jaeger, eds. (Lippincott, 2001).
  136. H. Küchler, 'Ueber den Zweck und die beste Einrichtung von Gesichtsproben,' Heidelb. Med. Ann. 10, 408-418 (1844).
  137. H. Küchler, Schriftnummerproben für Gesichtsleidende (Darmstadt, 1853).
  138. E. Jaeger, Ueber Staar und Staaroperationen (Seidel, 1854).
  139. H. Snellen, Letterproeven tot Bepaling der Gezichtsscherpte (Utrecht, 1862).
  140. H. Snellen, Optotypen, to Bepaling der Gezichtsscherpte, 2nd ed. (Utrecht, 1882).
  141. H. Snellen and E. Landolt, 'Bestimmung der Sehschärfe,' in Graefe-Saemisch Handbuch der gesamten Augenheilkunde (Engelmann, 1874), Vol. 3.
  142. E. Landolt, 'Bestimmung der Sehschärfe,' in Graefe-Saemisch Handbuch der gesamten Augenheilkunde, 2nd ed. (Engelmann, 1904), Vol. 3.
  143. D. Brewster, 'On the accommodation of the eye to different distances,' Edin. J. Sci. 1, 77-83 (1824).
  144. J. P. McMurrich, Leonardo da Vinci the Anatomist (1452-1519) (Williams & Wilkins, 1930).
  145. R. Whytt, An Essay on the Vital and Other Involuntary Motions of Animals (Hamilton, Balfour, and Neill,1751).
  146. M. J. Eadie, 'Robert Whytt and the pupils,' J. Clin. Neurosci. 7, 295-297 (2000).
  147. M. L. Robinson and F. J. Lovicu, 'The lens: historical and comparative perspectives,' in The Development of the Ocular Lens, F.J.Lovicu and M.L.Robinson, eds. (Cambridge U. Press, 2004), pp. 3-26.
  148. T. Young, 'Observations on vision,' Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 83, 169-181 (1793).
  149. A. Robinson, The Last Man Who Knew Everything (Pi Press, 2006).
  150. N. J. Wade, 'Introduction,' in Thomas Young's Lectures on Natural Philosophy and the Mechanical Arts (1807), N.J.Wade, ed. (Thoemmes, 2002). pp. vi-xxiv.
  151. H. Helmholtz, 'Handbuch der physiologischen Optik,' in Allgemeine Encyklopädie der Physik, G.Karsten, ed. (Voss, 1867), Vol. 9.
  152. D. Brewster, 'On the anatomical and optical structure of the crystalline lenses of animals, particularly that of the cod,' Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 123, 323-332 (1833).
  153. D. Brewster, 'On the structure of the crystalline lens in fishes and quadrapeds as ascertained by its action on polarised light,' Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 106, 311-317 (1816).
  154. D. Brewster, 'On the development and extinction of regularly double refracting structures in the crystalline lenses of animals after death,' Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 127, 253-258 (1837).
  155. G. Duncan, 'Brewster's contribution to the study of the lens of the eye: an experimental foundation for modern biophysics,' in 'Martyr of Science': Sir David Brewster 1781-1868, A.D.Morrison-Low and J.R. R.Christie, eds. (Royal Scottish Museum Studies, 1984), pp. 101-103.
  156. F. Platter, Observationum (Waldkirch, 1614).
  157. T. Willis, Cerebri Anatome: cui accessit Nervorum Descriptio et Usus (Martyn and Allestry, 1664).
  158. C. Dechales, Cursus seu Mundus Mathematicus (Anissons, 1674).
  159. P. de La Hire, 'Dissertation sur les differens accidens de la vue,' in Mémoires de Mathématique et de Physique (Anisson, 1694), pp. 233-302.
  160. C. W., 'Contributions to the physiology of vision. No. I,' J. R. Inst. 1, 101-117 (1830).
  161. N. J. Wade, ed., Brewster and Wheatstone on Vision (Academic, 1983).
  162. D. Brewster, 'On the optical phenomena, nature, and locality of muscae volitantes; with observations on the structure of the vitreous humour, and on the vision of objects placed within the eye,' Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Edin. 15, 377-385 (1844).
  163. E. Mariotte, 'A new discovery touching vision,' Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 3, 668-669 (1668).
  164. A. Pecquet, 'Answer to Mr. Mariotte,' Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 3, 669-671 (1668).
  165. C. Bell, The Anatomy of the Human Body (Longman, 1803), Vol. 3.
  166. J. Purkinje, Beobachtungen und Versuche zur Physiologie der Sinne. Beiträge zur Kenntniss des Sehens in subjectiver Hinsicht (Calve, 1823).
  167. S. T. von Soemmerring, Abbildungen des menschlichen Auges (Varrentrapp and Wenner, 1801).
  168. W. G. Horner, 'On the autoptic spectrum of certain vessels within the eye, as delineated in shadows on the retina,' Philos. Mag. 4, 262-271 (1834).
  169. H. Müller, 'Über die entoptische Wahrnehmung der Netzhautfässe, insbesonders als Beweismittel für die Lichtperception durch die nach hintern gelegenen Netzhautelemente,' Verh. Phys.-Med. Ges. Würzburg , 5, 411-447 (1855).
  170. H. Müller, 'Zur Histologie der Netzhaut,' Wiss. Z. Zool. 3, 234-237 (1851).
  171. J. Schickore, 'Locating rods and cones: microscopic investigations of the retina in mid-nineteenth-century Berlin and Würzburg,' Sci. Context 13, 137-152 (2000).
  172. J. Wodderbornius, Quatuor Problematum quae Martinus Horky contra Nuntium Sidereum de Quatuor Planetis Novis Disputanda Proposuit. Confutatio (Marinelli, 1610).
  173. J. J. Fahie, Galileo: His Life and Work (John Murray, 1903).
  174. R. Hooke, Micrographia: or Some Physiological Descriptions of Minute Bodies Made by Magnifying Glasses with Observations and Inquiries Thereupon (Martyn and Allestry, 1665).
  175. B. J. Ford, The Leeuwenhoek Legacy (Biopress, 1991).
  176. B. J. Ford, 'Instrumentation and microscopy,' in Brain, Mind, and Medicine: Essays in 18th Century Neuroscience, H.A.Whitaker, C.U. M.Smith, and S.Finger, eds. (Springer, to be published).
  177. A. van Leeuwenhoek, 'More observations from Mr. Leewenhook,' Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 9, 178-182 (1674).
  178. A. van Leeuwenhoek, 'Microscopical observations from Mr. Leewenhoeck, concerning the optick nerve,' Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 9, 378-380 (1675).
  179. N. J. Wade, 'Vision and the dimensions of nerve fibers,' J. Hist. Neurosci. 14, 281-294 (2005).
  180. H. Harris, The Birth of the Cell (Yale U. Press, 1999).
  181. S. L. Polyak, The Retina (University of Chicago,1942).
  182. S. Polyak, The Vertebrate Visual System (University of Chicago, 1957).
  183. J. Schickore, 'Ever present impediments: exploring instruments and methods of microscopy,' Perspect. Sci. 9, 126-146 (2001).
  184. C. Wilson, The Invisible World. Early Modern Philosophy and the Invention of the Microscope (Princeton U. Press, 1995).
  185. M. Schleiden, 'Beiträge zur Phytogenesis,' Müller's Arch. Anat. Physiol Wiss. Med. 1838, 136-176.
  186. T. Schwann, Mikroskopische Untersuchungen über die Übereinstimmung in der Struktur und dem Wachsthum der Tiere und Pflanzen (Reimer, 1839).
  187. G. Shepherd, Foundations of the Neuron Doctrine (Oxford U. Press, 1991).
  188. J. D. Spillane, The Doctrine of the Nerves (Oxford U. Press, 1981).
  189. W. von Waldeyer, 'Über einige neuere Forschungen im Gebiete der Anatomie des Centralnervensystems,' Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. 17, 1213-1218, 1244-1246, 1267-1269, 1287-1289, 1331-1332, 1352-1356 (1891).
  190. C. Wheatstone, 'On the binocular microscope, and on stereoscopic pictures of microscopic objects,' Trans. Microsc. Soc. London B 1853, 99-102.
  191. F. H. Wenham, 'On the application of binocular vision to the microscope,' Trans. Microsc. Soc. London 2, 1-13 (1854).
  192. N. J. Wade, 'A note on the history of binocular microscopes,' Perception 10, 591-592 (1981).
  193. N. J. Wade, 'On the late invention of the stereoscope,' Perception 16, 785-818 (1987).
  194. E. H. Schmitz, Handbuch zur Geschichte der Optik. Das Mikroscop (Wayenborgh, 1990), Suppl. Vol. 2, pt. B.
  195. G. R. Treviranus, Beiträge zur Aufklärung der Erscheinungen und Gesetze des organischen Lebens. Volume 1, Issue 1. Ueber die blättige Textur der Crystalllinse des Auges als Grund des Vermögens, einerlei Gegenstand in verschiedener Entfernung deutlich zu sehen, und über den innern Bau der Retina (Heyse, 1835).
  196. G. R. Treviranus, Beiträge zur Aufklärung der Erscheinungen und Gesetze des organischen Lebens. Volume 1, Issue 3. Resultate neuer Untersuchungen über die Theorie des Sehens und über den innern Bau der Netzhaut des Auges (Heyse, 1837).
  197. G. R. Treviranus, Beiträge zur Anatomie und Physiologie der Sinneswerkzeuge des Menschen und der Thiere (Heyse, 1828).
  198. S. Finger, Origins of Neuroscience. A History of Explorations into Brain Function (Oxford U. Press,1994).
  199. J. Müller, Handbuch der Physiologie des Menschen für Vorlesungen (Hölscher, 1840), Vol. 2.
  200. J. Müller, Elements of Physiology, W.Baly, trans. (Taylor and Walton, 1843), Vol. 2.
  201. J. Müller, Müller's Elements of Physiology, 4 vols., N.J.Wade, ed. (Thoemmes, 2003).
  202. F. Bidder, 'Zur Anatomie der Retina, insbesondere zur Würdigung der stabförmigen Körper in derselben,' Müllers Arch. Anat. Physiol. Wiss. Med. 1839, 371-385.
  203. J. Schickore, ''Worauf die Strahlen der sichtbaren Gegenstände wirken': Mikroskopische Anatomic der Retina 1834-1841,' Med. Hist. J. 34, 139-157 (1999).
  204. W. Bowman, Lectures on the Parts Concerned in the Operations on the Eye and on the Structure of the Retina, Delivered at the Royal London Ophthalmic Hospital, Moorfields, June 1847 (Longmans, 1849).
  205. A. Hannover, 'Ueber die Netzhaut und ihre Gehirnsubstanz bei Wirbelthieren, mit Ausnahme des Menschen,' Müllers Arch. Anat. Physiol. Wiss. Med. 1840, 549-558.
  206. A. Hannover, Recherches Microscopiques sur la Systems Nerveux (Philipsen, 1844).
  207. A. Kölliker, Mikroscopische Anatomie oder Gewerbelehre des Menschen (Engelmann, 1854), Vol. 2.
  208. M. Schultze, Zur Anatomie und Physiologie der Retina (Cohen, 1866).
  209. C. Golgi, 'Sulla struttura della sostanza grigia del cervello,' Gazz. Med. Ital. (Lomb.) 6, 244-246 (1873).
  210. C. Golgi, Opera Omnia, 3 vols. (Hoepli, 1903).
  211. P. Mazzarello, The Hidden Structure. A Scientific Biography of Camilla Golgi, H.A.Buchtel and A.Badiani, trans. (Oxford University Press, 1999).
  212. F. Tartuferi, 'Sulla anatomia della retina,' Arch. Sci. Med. (Torino) 11, 335-358 (1887).
  213. M. Piccolino, 'Cajal and the retina: a 100-year retrospective,' Trends Neurosci. 11, 521-525 (1988).
  214. M. Piccolino, E. Strettoi, and E. Laurenzi, 'Santiago Ramon y Cajal, the retina and the neuron theory,' Doc. Ophthalmol. 71, 123-141 (1989).
  215. N. J. Wade and M. Piccolino, 'Nobel stains,' Perception 35, 1-8 (2006).
  216. S. Ramón y Cajal, 'Recollections of my life,' E. H. Craigie, Trans. Mem. Am. Philos. Soc. 8, 1-638 (1937).
  217. S. Ramón y Cajal, 'Recreaciones estereocópicas y binoculares,' La Fotografia (Madrid) 27, 41-48 (1901).
  218. A. Bergua and W. Skrandies, 'An early antecedent to modern random dot stereograms--'The secret stereoscopic writing' of Ramón y Cajal,' Int. J. Psychophysiol. 36, 69-72 (2000).
  219. B. Julesz, Foundations of Cyclopean Perception (University of Chicago, 1971).
  220. S. Ramón y Cajal, 'La rétine des vertébrés' La Cellule 9, 119-257 (1893).
  221. S. Ramón y Cajal, The Structure of the Retina, S.A.Thorpe and M.Glickstein, trans. (Charles C. Thomas, 1972).
  222. E. Mach, 'Über die Wirkung der räumlichen Vertheilung des Lichtreizes auf die Netzhaut,' Sitzungsber. Math.-Naturwiss. Kl. Kaiserl. Akad. Wiss. 52, 330-322 (1865).
  223. F. Ratliff, Mach Bands: Quantitative Studies on Neural Networks in the Retina (Holden-Day, 1965).
  224. H. K. Hartline, 'A quantitative and descriptive study of the electric response to illumination of the arthropod eye,' Am. J. Physiol. 83, 466-483 (1928).
  225. H. B. Barlow, 'Summation and inhibition in the frog's retina,' J. Physiol. (London) 119, 69-88 (1953).
  226. S. W. Kuffler, 'Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina,' J. Neurophysiol. 16, 37-68 (1953).
  227. P. Freher, Theatrum Virorum Eruditione Clarorum (Hofmann, 1688).
  228. C. Perrault, Les Hommes Illustres qui ont paru en France pendent ce Siecle: avec leurs Portraits naturel (Dezallier, 1696), Vol. 1.
  229. J. Psotnícková, Jan Evangelista Purkynĕ (Orbis, 1955).
  230. H. Helmholtz, Handbuch der Physiologisehen Optik, 2nd ed. (Voss, 1896).
  231. H. Gurney, Memoir of the Life of Thomas Young, M.D.F.R.S. (John & Arthur Arch, 1831).
  232. F. H. Verhoeff, 'Two new astigmatic charts,' Ophthal. Rec. 8, 541-544 (1899).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited