OSA's Digital Library

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

| EXPLORING THE INTERFACE OF LIGHT AND BIOMEDICINE

  • Editor: Gregory W. Faris
  • Vol. 5, Iss. 1 — Jan. 4, 2010

Stochastic variations in sensory awareness are driven by noisy neuronal adaptation: evidence from serial correlations in perceptual bistability

Raymond van Ee  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 26, Issue 12, pp. 2612-2622 (2009)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.26.002612


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (632 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

When the sensory system is subjected to ambiguous input, perception alternates between interpretations in a seemingly random fashion. Although neuronal noise obviously plays a role, the neural mechanism for the generation of randomness at the slow time scale of the percept durations (multiple seconds) is unresolved. Here significant nonzero serial correlations are reported in series of visual percept durations (to the author's knowledge for the first time accounting for duration impurities caused by reaction time, drift, and incomplete percepts). Serial correlations for perceptual rivalry using structure-from-motion ambiguity were smaller than for binocular rivalry using orthogonal gratings. A spectrum of computational models is considered, and it is concluded that noise in adaptation of percept-related neurons causes the serial correlations. This work bridges, in a physiologically plausible way, widely appreciated deterministic modeling and randomness in experimental observations of visual rivalry.

© 2009 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.4060) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision modeling
(330.5020) Vision, color, and visual optics : Perception psychology
(330.5510) Vision, color, and visual optics : Psychophysics
(330.7320) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision adaptation

ToC Category:
Vision, Color, and Visual Optics

History
Original Manuscript: July 10, 2009
Revised Manuscript: October 11, 2009
Manuscript Accepted: October 22, 2009
Published: November 18, 2009

Virtual Issues
Vol. 5, Iss. 1 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Raymond van Ee, "Stochastic variations in sensory awareness are driven by noisy neuronal adaptation: evidence from serial correlations in perceptual bistability," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 26, 2612-2622 (2009)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/vjbo/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-26-12-2612


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. F. Sengpiel, R. J. Baddeley, T. C. B. Freeman, R. Harrad, and C. Blakemore, “Different mechanisms underlie three inhibitory phenomena in cat area 17,” Vision Res. 38, 2067-2080 (1998). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. R. Blake, D. H. Westendorf, and R. Fox, “Temporal pertubations of binocular rivalry,” Percept. Psychophys. 48, 593-602 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. R. Blake and N. K. Logothetis, “Visual competition,” Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 1-11 (2002). [CrossRef]
  4. D. Alais and R. Blake, Binocular Rivalry (The MIT Press, 2005).
  5. Y. J. Kim, M. Grabowecky, and S. Suzuki, “Stochastic resonance in binocular rivalry,” Vision Res. 46, 392-406 (2006). [CrossRef]
  6. J. W. Brascamp, R. van Ee, A. J. Noest, R. H. A. H. Jacobs, and A. V. van den Berg, “The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise,” J. Vision 6, 1244-1256 (2006). [CrossRef]
  7. J. M. Lankheet, “Unraveling adaptation and mutual inhibition in perceptual rivalry,” J. Vision 6, 304-310 (2006). [CrossRef]
  8. R. Moreno-Bote, J. Rinzel, and N. Rubin, “Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bi-stability,” J. Neurophysiol. 98, 1125-1139 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. S. R. Lehky, “An astable multivibrator model of binocular rivalry,” Perception 17, 215-228 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. L. Stollenwerk and M. Bode, “Lateral neural model of binocular rivalry,” Neural Comput. 15, 2863-2882 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. A. H. Kawamoto and J. A. Anderson, “A neural network model of multistable perception,” Acta Psychol. 59, 35-65 (1985). [CrossRef]
  12. R. Blake, “A neural theory of binocular rivalry,” Psychol. Rev. 96, 145-167 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. T. J. Mueller, “A physiological model of binocular rivalry,” Visual Neurosci. 4, 63-73 (1990). [CrossRef]
  14. P. Dayan, “A hierarchical model of binocular rivalry,” Neural Comput. 10, 1119-1135 (1998). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. E. D. Lumer, “A neural model of binocular integration and rivalry based on the coordination of action-potential timing in primary visual cortex,” Cereb. Cortex 8, 553-561 (1998). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. H. S. Hock, G. Schoner, and M. Giese, “The dynamical foundations of motion pattern formation: Stability, selective adaptation, and perceptual continuity,” Percept. Psychophys. 65, 429-457 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. G. J. Kalarickal and J. A. Marshall, “Neural model of temporal and stochastic properties of binocular rivalry,” Neurocomputing 32-33, 843-853 (2000). [CrossRef]
  18. C. R. Laing and C. C. Chow, “A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry,” J. Comput. Neurosci. 12, 39-53 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. K. Matsuoka, “The dynamic model of binocular rivalry,” Biol. Cybern. 49, 201-208 (1984). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. H. R. Wilson, “Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 14499-14503 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. A. Koene, “A model for perceptual averaging and stochastic bistable behavior and the role of voluntary control,” Neural Comput. 18, 3069-3096 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. A. J. Noest, R. van Ee, M. M. Nijs, and R. J. A. van Wezel, “Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: A low-level neural model,” J. Vision 7(8):10, 1-14 (2007). [CrossRef]
  23. R. Fox and J. Herrmann, “Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations,” Percept. Psychophys. 2, 432-436 (1967). [CrossRef]
  24. R. Blake, R. Fox, and C. McIntyre, “Stochastic properties of stabilized-image binocular rivalry alternations,” J. Exp. Psychol. 88, 327-332 (1971). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. P. Walker, “Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations,” Percept. Psychophys. 18, 467-473 (1975). [CrossRef]
  26. S. R. Lehky, “Binocular rivalry is not chaotic,” Proc. R. Soc. London 259, 71-76 (1995). [CrossRef]
  27. A. Borsellino, A. De Marco, A. Allazetta, A. Rinesi, and B. Bartolini, “Reversal time distribution in the perception of visual ambiguous stimuli,” Kybernetik 10, 139-144 (1972). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. N. K. Logothetis, D. A. Leopold, and D. L. Sheinberg, “What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?,” Nature 380, 621-624 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. J. B. Gao, V. A. Billock, I. Merk, W. W. Tung, K. D. White, J. G. Harris, and V. P. Roychowdhury, “Inertia and memory in ambiguous visual perception,” Lang. Cognit. Processes 7, 105-112 (2006). [CrossRef]
  30. P. Mamassian and R. Goutcher, “Temporal dynamics in bistable perception,” J. Vision 5, 361-375 (2005). [CrossRef]
  31. R. van Ee, “Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability for stereoscopic slant rivalry and a comparison with grating, house-face, and Necker cube rivalry,” Vision Res. 45, 29-40 (2005), doi:. [CrossRef]
  32. S. Suzuki and M. Grabowecky, “Long-term speeding in perceptual switches mediated by attention-dependent plasticity in cortical visual processing,” Neuron 56, 741-753 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. J. W. Brascamp, T. H. J. Knapen, R. Kanai, A. J. Noest, R. van Ee, and A. V. van den Berg, “Multi-timescale perceptual history resolves visual ambiguity,” PLoS one e1497 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. T. J. Mueller and R. Blake, “A fresh look at the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry,” Biol. Cybern. 61, 223-232 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. K. Hol, A. Koene, and R. van Ee, “Attention-biased multi-stable surface perception in three-dimensional structure-from-motion,” J. Vision 3, 486-498 (2003). [CrossRef]
  36. X. Chen and S. He, “Local factors determine the stabilization of monocular ambiguous and binocular rivalry stimuli,” Curr. Biol. 14, 1013-1017 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. G. J. Brouwer and R. van Ee, “Endogenous influences on perceptual bistability depend on exogenous stimulus characteristics,” Vision Res. 46, 3393-3402 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. A. Wanning, V. Rodriguez, and W. A. Freiwald, “Attention to surfaces modulates motion processing in extrastriate area MT,” Neuron 54, 639-651 (2007). [CrossRef]
  39. P. C. Klink, R. van Ee, M. M. Nijs, G. J. Brouwer, A. J. Noest, and R. J. A. van Wezel, “Early interactions between neuronal adaptation and voluntary control determine perceptual choices in bistable vision,” J. Vision 8(5):16, 1-18 (2008). [CrossRef]
  40. J. Pearson and J. W. Brascamp, “Sensory memory for ambiguous vision,” Trends Cogn. Sci. 12, 334-341 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. J. W. Brascamp, J. Pearson, R. Blake, and A. V. van den Berg, “Intermittent ambiguous stimuli: Implicit memory causes periodic perceptual alternations,” J. Vision 9(3):3, 1-23 (2009). [CrossRef]
  42. J. W. Brascamp, R. van Ee, W. R. Pestman, and A. V. van den Berg, “Distributions of alternation rates in various forms of bistable perception,” J. Vision 5, 287-298 (2005). [CrossRef]
  43. R. van Ee, A. J. Noest, J. W. Brascamp, and A. V. van den Berg, “Attentional control over either of the two competing percepts of ambiguous stimuli revealed by a two-parameter analysis: Means don't make the difference,” Vision Res. 46, 3129-3141 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. W. J. M. Levelt, On Binocular Rivalry (Royal van Gorcum, 1965).
  45. L. T. Alexander and P. D. Bricker, “Figure ground-contrast in binocular rivalry,” J. Exp. Psychol. 44, 452-454 (1952). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. W. J. M. Levelt, “Note on the distribution of dominance times in binocular rivalry,” Br. J. Psychol. 58, 143-145 (1967). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. R. van Ee, L. C. J. van Dam, and G. J. Brouwer, “Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability,” Vision Res. 45, 41-55 (2005), doi:. [CrossRef]
  48. D. Pressnitzer and J. M. Hupé, “Temporal dynamics of auditory and visual bistability reveal common principles of perceptual organization,” Curr. Biol. 16, 1351-1357 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. J. M. Hupé, L. M. Joffo, and D. Pressnitzer, “Bistability for audiovisual stimuli: Perceptual decision is modality specific,” J. Vision 8(7):1, 1-15 (2008). [CrossRef]
  50. A. O. Holcombe and T. Seizova-Cajic, “Illusory motion reversals from unambiguous motion with visual, proprioceptive, and tactile stimuli,” Vision Res. 48, 1743-1757 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. M. M. Taylor and K. D. Aldridge, “Stochastic processes in reversing figure perception,” Percept. Psychophys. 16, 9-25 (1974). [CrossRef]
  52. A. De Marco, P. Penengo, A. Trabucco, A. Borsellino, F. Carlini, M. Riani, and M. T. Tuccio, “Stochastic models and fluctuation in reversal time of ambiguous figures,” Perception 6, 645-656 (1977). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. I. Merk and J. Schnakenberg, “A stochastic model of multistable visual perception,” Biol. Cybern. 86, 111-116 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Y. H. Zhou, J. B. Gao, K. D. White, I. Merk, and K. Yao, “Perceptual dominance time distributions in multistable visual perception,” Biol. Cybern. 4, 256-263 (2004). [CrossRef]
  55. A. W. Freeman, “Multistage model for binocular rivalry,” J. Neurophysiol. 94, 4412-4420 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. H. R. Wilson, “Minimal physiological conditions for binocular rivalry and rivalry memory,” Vision Res. 47, 2741-2750 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. G. Deco and D. Marti, “Deterministic analysis of stochastic bifurcations in multi-stable neurodynamical systems,” Biol. Cybern. 96, 487-496 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. G. Gigante, M. Mattia, J. Braun, and P. Del Giudice, “Bistable perception modeled as competing stochastic integrations at two levels,” PLOS Comput. Biol. 5(7), e1000430 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. R. Borisyuk, D. Chik, and Y. Kazanovich, “Visual perception of ambiguous figures: synchronization based neural models,” Biol. Cybern. 100, 491-504 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. A. H. G. S. van der Ven, F. M. Gremmen, and J. C. Smit, “A statistical model for binocular rivalry,” Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 58, 97-116 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. D. A. Leopold, M. Wilke, A. Maier, and N. K. Logothetis, “Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns,” Nat. Neurosci. 5, 605-609 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. C. L. Paffen, D. Alais, and F. A. Verstraten, “Attention speeds binocular rivalry,” Psychol. Sci. 17, 752-756 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. L. C. J. van Dam and R. van Ee, “The role of (micro) saccades and blinks in perceptual bistability from slant rivalry,” Vision Res. 45, 2417-2435 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. L. C. J. van Dam and R. van Ee, “Retinal image shifts, but not eye movements per se, cause alternations in awareness during binocular rivalry,” J. Vision 6(11):3, 1172-1179 (2006). [CrossRef]
  65. L. C. J. van Dam and R. van Ee, “The role of saccades in exerting voluntary control in perceptual and binocular rivalry,” Vision Res. 46, 787-799 (2006). [CrossRef]
  66. P. C. Klink, R. van Ee, and R. J. A. van Wezel, “General validity of Levelt's propositions reveals common computational mechanisms for visual rivalry,” PLoS one 3(10), e3473 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. N. Rubin and J.-M. Hupé, “Dynamics of perceptual bistability: Plaids and binocular rivalry compared,” in Binocular rivalry, D.Alais and R.Blake, eds. (The MIT Press, 2005), pp. 137-154.
  68. M. Meng and F. Tong, “Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures,” J. Vision 4, 539-551 (2004). [CrossRef]
  69. W. Richards, H. R. Wilson, and M. A. Sommer, “Chaos in percepts,” Biol. Cybern. 70, 345-349 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. S. Suzuki and M. Grabowecky, “Evidence for perceptual “trapping” and adaptation in multistable binocular rivalry,” Neuron 36, 143-157 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. D. A. Leopold and N. K. Logothetis, “Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception,” Trends Cogn. Sci. 3, 254-264 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. T. Murata, N. Matsui, S. Miyauchi, Y. Kakita, and T. Yanagida, “Discrete stochastic process underlying perceptual rivalry,” NeuroReport 14, 1347-1352 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. L. C. J. van Dam, R. Mulder, A. J. Noest, J. W. Brascamp, A. V. van den Berg, and R. van Ee, “Sequential dependency in percept durations for binocular rivalry,” J. Vision 7(9), 53 (2007).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited