OSA's Digital Library

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

| EXPLORING THE INTERFACE OF LIGHT AND BIOMEDICINE

  • Editor: Gregory W. Faris
  • Vol. 5, Iss. 9 — Jul. 6, 2010

Stochastic modeling of polarized light scattering using a Monte Carlo based stencil method

Miloš Šormaz, Tobias Stamm, and Patrick Jenny  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 27, Issue 5, pp. 1100-1110 (2010)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.27.001100


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1216 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

This paper deals with an efficient and accurate simulation algorithm to solve the vector Boltzmann equation for polarized light transport in scattering media. The approach is based on a stencil method, which was previously developed for unpolarized light scattering and proved to be much more efficient (speedup factors of up to 10 were reported) than the classical Monte Carlo while being equally accurate. To validate what we believe to be the new stencil method, a substrate composed of spherical non-absorbing particles embedded in a non-absorbing medium was considered. The corresponding single scattering Mueller matrix, which is required to model scattering of polarized light, was determined based on the Lorenz–Mie theory. From simulations of a reflected polarized laser beam, the Mueller matrix of the substrate was computed and compared with an established reference. The agreement is excellent, and it could be demonstrated that a significant speedup of the simulations is achieved due to the stencil approach compared with the classical Monte Carlo.

© 2010 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(030.5620) Coherence and statistical optics : Radiative transfer
(260.5430) Physical optics : Polarization
(290.1350) Scattering : Backscattering
(290.4020) Scattering : Mie theory
(290.4210) Scattering : Multiple scattering
(290.7050) Scattering : Turbid media

ToC Category:
Scattering

History
Original Manuscript: November 2, 2009
Revised Manuscript: February 25, 2010
Manuscript Accepted: February 25, 2010
Published: April 20, 2010

Virtual Issues
Vol. 5, Iss. 9 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Miloš Šormaz, Tobias Stamm, and Patrick Jenny, "Stochastic modeling of polarized light scattering using a Monte Carlo based stencil method," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 27, 1100-1110 (2010)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/vjbo/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-27-5-1100


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. M. J. Raković, G. W. Kattawar, M. Mehrűbeoğlu, B. D. Cameron, L. V. Wang, S. Rastegar, and G. L. Coté, “Light backscattering polarization patterns from turbid media: theory and experiment,” Appl. Opt. 38, 3399–3408 (1999). [CrossRef]
  2. P. Yang, H. Wei, G. W. Kattawar, Y. X. Hu, D. M. Winker, C. A. Hostetler, and B. A. Baum, “Sensitivity of the backscattering Mueller matrix to particle shape and thermodynamic phase,” Appl. Opt. 42, 4389–4395 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. R. Lawless, Y. Xie, P. Yang, G. W. Kattawar, and I. Laszlo, “Polarization and effective Mueller matrix for multiple scattering of light by nonspherical ice crystals,” Opt. Express 14, 6381–6393 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. S. K. Gayen and R. R. Alfano, “Emerging optical biomedical imaging techniques,” Opt. Photonics News 7, 16–22 (1996). [CrossRef]
  5. X. Wang and L. V. Wang, “Propagation of polarized light in birefringent turbid media: a Monte Carlo study,” J. Biomed. Opt. 7, 279–290 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. B. Kaplan, G. Ledanois, and B. Drevillon, “Mueller matrix of dense polystyrene latex sphere suspensions: measurements and Monte Carlo simulation,” Appl. Opt. 40, 2769–2777 (2001). [CrossRef]
  7. M. Xu, “Electric field Monte Carlo simulation of polarized light propagating in turbid media,” Opt. Express 12, 6530–6539 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. P. Jenny, S. Mourad, T. Stamm, M. Vöge, and K. Simon, “Computing light statistics in heterogeneous media based on a mass weighted probability density function method,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 24, 2206–2219 (2007). [CrossRef]
  9. P. Jenny, M. Vöge, S. Mourad, and T. Stamm, “Modeling light scattering in paper for halftone print,” in Proceedings of the CGIV (IS&T, 2006), pp. 443–447.
  10. M. Šormaz, T. Stamm, S. Mourad, and P. Jenny, “Stochastic modeling of light scattering with fluorescence using a Monte Carlo-based multiscale approach,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 26, 1403–1413 (2009). [CrossRef]
  11. H. C. van de Hulst, Light Scattering by Small Particles (Wiley, 1957).
  12. C. F. Bohren and D. R. Huffman, Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles (Wiley, 1983).
  13. H. Du, “Mie-scattering calculation,” Appl. Opt. 43, 1951–1956 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. W. J. Wiscombe, “Mie scattering calculations: advances in technique and fast, vector-speed computer codes,” Tech. Note NCAR/TN-140+STR (National Center for Atmospheric Research, 1979); ftp://climate.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/wiscombe/Single_Scatt/Homogen_Sphere/Exact_Mie/NCARMieReport.pdf.
  15. R. T. Wang and H. C. van de Hulst, “Rainbows: Mie computations and the Airy approximation,” Appl. Opt. 30, 106–117 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited