OSA's Digital Library

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics


  • Editors: Andrew Dunn and Anthony Durkin
  • Vol. 8, Iss. 8 — Sep. 4, 2013

Statistical quantification of the effects of viewing distance on texture perception

Liang Li, Akira Asano, Chie Muraki Asano, and Katsunori Okajima  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 30, Issue 7, pp. 1394-1403 (2013)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1512 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



In general, viewers are more attracted to local features in images at a shorter viewing distance and to global features in images at a longer viewing distance. However, numerical analysis of the effect of viewing distance on human texture perception and how the perception of global and local changes under certain conditions are still undetermined. In this paper, we present statistical prediction of the relationship between the domination ratio of global and local features and the viewing distances under the control of several factors, using the logistic regression model. We synthesized textures by separately controlling global and local textural features using a texture model based on mathematical morphology, namely the primitive, grain, and point configuration texture model. Visual sensory tests were carried out on 80 subjects during two sets of experiments. The collected data were statistically analyzed using logistic regression and Akaike information criteria. Besides the main factor of viewing distance, the factors including gender, changing the order of viewing positions, and prior knowledge were also shown quantitatively to have significant influence on human texture perception. Our results showed that (1) local features of a texture were more attractive to females than males, (2) the first impression might have affected subsequent decisions in texture perception, and (3) subjects who had prior knowledge (supervised) were more sensitive to the changes in global and local dominance. (4) Regarding the interactions of the factors, prior knowledge reduced the effects of individual differences and perception condition differences on human texture perception. This study is dedicated to the construction of numerical relationships between viewing distance and human texture perception as well as to cognitive investigation of biases in global and local perceptions.

© 2013 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.5000) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision - patterns and recognition
(330.5020) Vision, color, and visual optics : Perception psychology

ToC Category:
Vision, Color, and Visual Optics

Original Manuscript: October 22, 2012
Revised Manuscript: April 26, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: June 2, 2013
Published: June 26, 2013

Virtual Issues
Vol. 8, Iss. 8 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Liang Li, Akira Asano, Chie Muraki Asano, and Katsunori Okajima, "Statistical quantification of the effects of viewing distance on texture perception," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 30, 1394-1403 (2013)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. M. Petrou and P. Garicia-Sevilla, Image Processing: Deal with Texture (Wiley, 2006).
  2. S. Morioka, M. Kamijo, S. Hosoya, T. Sadoyama, and Y. Shimizu, “Mathematical modeling for texture of fabrics using multi image,” IEICE Tech. Rep., Vol. 100 (IEICE, 2000), pp. 39–46.
  3. B. Caputo, E. Hayman, M. Fritz, and J.-O. Eklundh, “Classifying materials in the real world,” Image Vision Comput. 28, 150–163 (2010). [CrossRef]
  4. R. Silvers, Photomosaics (Henry Holt, 1997).
  5. A. Oliva, A. Torralba, and P. G. Schyns, “Hybrid images,” ACM Trans. Graph. 25, 527–530 (2006). [CrossRef]
  6. H. Tamura, S. Mori, and T. Yamawaki, “Textural features corresponding to visual perception,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. A 8, 460–473 (1978). [CrossRef]
  7. M. Amadasun and R. King, “Textural features corresponding to textural properties,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. A 19, 1264–1274 (1989). [CrossRef]
  8. A. R. Rao, “Identifying high level features of texture perception,” Comput. Vision Graph. Image Process. 55, 218–233 (1993).
  9. A. R. Rao and G. L. Lohse, “Towards a texture naming system: identifying relevant dimensions of texture,” Vision Res. 36, 1649–1669 (1996). [CrossRef]
  10. C. Muraki, A. Asano, L. Li, and T. Fujimoto, “Morphological texture manipulation for the evaluation of human visual sensibility,” Kansei Eng. Int. J. 10, 11–18 (2010).
  11. L. Li, A. Asano, and C. Muraki Asano, “Statistical analysis of human visual impressions on morphological image manipulation of gray scale textures,” Opt. Rev. 17, 90–96 (2010). [CrossRef]
  12. R. Kimchi, “Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local praradigm: a critical review,” Psychol. Bull. 112, 24–38 (1992). [CrossRef]
  13. M. A. Boeschoten, C. Kemner, J. L. Kenemans, and H. van Engeland, “The relationship between local and global processing and the processing of high and low spatial frequencies studied by event-related potentials and source modeling,” Cogn. Brain Res. 24, 228–236 (2005). [CrossRef]
  14. J. Davidoof, E. Fonteneau, and J. Fagot, “Local and global processing: observations from a remote culture,” Cognition 108, 702–709 (2008). [CrossRef]
  15. E. McKone, A. A. Davies, D. Fernando, R. Aalders, H. Leung, T. Wickramariyaratne, and M. J. Platow, “Asia has the global advantage: race and visual attention,” Vis. Res. 50, 1540–1549 (2010). [CrossRef]
  16. D. Navon, “Forest before trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception,” Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353–383 (1977).
  17. C. L. Dulaney and W. Marks, “The effects of training and transfer on global/local processing,” Acta Psychol. 125, 203–220 (2007). [CrossRef]
  18. D. Pena, M. J. Contreras, P. C. Shih, and J. Santacreu, “Solution strategies as possible explanations of individual and sex differences in a dynamic spatial task,” Acta Psychol. 128, 1–14 (2008). [CrossRef]
  19. L. Li, A. Asano, and C. Muraki Asano, “Analysis of the effect of the viewing distance in texture perception using morphological and statistical model,” in Proceedings of the 2009 International Workshop on Smart Info-Media Systems in Asia (IEICE, 2009), pp. 125–130.
  20. J. Serra, Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology, Vol. 2Technical Advances (Academic, 1988).
  21. P. Soille, Morphological Image Analysis, 2nd ed. (Springer, 2003).
  22. H. J. A. M. Heijmans, Morphological Image Operators (Academic, 1994).
  23. A. Asano, T. Ohkubo, M. Muneyasu, and T. Hinamoto, “Primitive and point configuration texture model and primitive estimation using mathematical morphology,” in Proceedings of the 13th Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis (Springer, 2003), pp. 178–185.
  24. R. Kimchi, R. Amishav, and A. Sulitzeanu-Kenan, “Gender differences in global/local perception? Evidence from orientation and shape judgments,” Acta Psychol. 131, 64–71 (2008).
  25. H. Akaike, “A new look at the statistical model identification,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 19, 716–723 (1974). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited