Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Reply to Comment on “Generation of 10 11 contrast 50 TW laser pulses”

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

We show that the Comment of Albert et al. [Opt. Lett. 31, 2990 (2006) ], although being only marginally relevant to the content of the original paper [Opt. Lett. 31, 1456 (2006) ], misinterprets our results and leads to a wrong conclusion: that the rotation of the second crystal in the double-crystal scheme is unimportant. On the contrary, it follows from the Comment itself as well as from our experiment that the crystal rotation is the main factor in improving the efficiency.

© 2006 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Comment on "Generation of 1011 contrast 50 TW laser pulses"

O. Albert, A. Jullien, J. Etchepare, S. Kourtev, N. Minkovski, and S. M. Saltiel
Opt. Lett. 31(20) 2990-2992 (2006)

Generation of 1011 contrast 50 TW laser pulses

V. Chvykov, P. Rousseau, S. Reed, G. Kalinchenko, and V. Yanovsky
Opt. Lett. 31(10) 1456-1458 (2006)

Reply to Comment on 'Exact solution of resonant modes in a rectangular resonator'

Jiu Hui Wu and A. Q. Liu
Opt. Lett. 31(16) 2470-2470 (2006)

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved