OSA's Digital Library

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

| EXPLORING THE INTERFACE OF LIGHT AND BIOMEDICINE

  • Editor: Gregory W. Faris
  • Vol. 3, Iss. 1 — Jan. 29, 2008
« Show journal navigation

Modification of visible spontaneous emission with silicon nitride photonic crystal nanocavities

Michael Barth, Josef Kouba, Johannes Stingl, Bernd Löchel, and Oliver Benson  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 15, Issue 25, pp. 17231-17240 (2007)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.15.017231


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (653 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Photonic crystal (PC) nanocavities based on silicon nitride membranes are studied as tools for the manipulation of spontaneous emission in the wavelength range between 550 nm and 800 nm. We observe a strong modification of the fluorescence spectrum of dye molecules spin-cast on top of the PC, indicating an efficient coupling of the dye emission to the cavity modes. The cavity design is optimized with respect to the quality factor and values of nearly 1500 are achieved experimentally. Taking into account the small mode volume, which leads to a strong Purcell enhancement, these nanocavities enable the realization of efficient single photon sources in the visible region of the spectrum. Furthermore, their fabrication is fully compatible with existing CMOS technology, making an integration into more complex optoelectronic devices feasible.

© 2007 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Photonic crystal (PC) nanocavities can confine light within extremely small volumes on the order of the cubic wavelength, thus providing an intense interaction of the light and embedded emitters. This light-matter interaction has lead to the observation of a number of quantum electrodynamic (QED) phenomena, such as Rabi-splitting [1

1. T. Yoshie, A. Scherer, J. Hendrickson, G. Khitrova, H. M. Gibbs, G. Rupper, C. Ell, O. B. Shchekin, and D. G. Deppe, “Vacuum rabi splitting with a single quantum dot in a photonic crystal nanocavity,” Nature 432, 200–203 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,2

2. K. Hennessy, A. Badolato, M. Winger, D. Gerace, M. Atatüre, S. Gulde, S. Fält, E. L. Hu, and A. Imamoǧlu, “Quantum nature of a strongly coupled single quantum dot-cavity system,” Nature 445, 896–899 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] (in the strong coupling regime) and the Purcell enhancement of spontaneous emission [3

3. A. Badolato, K. Hennessy, M. Atatüre, J. Dreiser, E. L. Hu, P. M. Petroff, and A. Imamoǧlu, “Deterministic coupling of single quantum dots to single nanocavity modes,” Science 308, 1158–1161 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 4

4. D. Englund, D. Fattal, E. Waks, G. Solomon, B. Zhang, T. Nakaoda, Y. Arakawa, Y. Yamamoto, and J. Vučković, “Controlling the spontaneous emission rate of single quantum dots in a two-dimensional photonic crystal,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 013904 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] (in the weak coupling regime). The latter effect can be exploited, e.g., for the realization of low-threshold nanolasers [5

5. O. Painter, R. K. Lee, A. Scherer, A. Yariv, J. D. O’Brien, P. D. Dapkus, and I. Kim, “Two-dimensional photonic band-gap defect mode laser,” Science 284, 1819–1821 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,6

6. K. Nozaki, S. Kita, and T. Baba, “Room temperature continuous wave operation and controlled spontaneous emission in ultrasmall photonic crystal nanolaser,” Opt. Express 15, 7506–7514 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] and efficient single photon sources [7

7. S. Laurent, S. Varoutsis, L. Le Gratiet, A. Lemaître, I. Sagnes, F. Raineri, A. Levenson, I. Robert-Philip, and I. Abram, “Indistinguishable single photons from a single-quantum dot in a two-dimensional photonic crystal cavity,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 163107 (2005). [CrossRef]

, 8

8. J. Vučković, D. Englund, D. Fattal, E. Waks, and Y. Yamamoto, “Generation and manipulation of nonclassical light using photonic crystals,” Physica E 32, 466–470 (2006). [CrossRef]

].

Most of the reports on PC nanocavities and their coupling to emitters have concentrated on material systems with high refractive indices, such as Si or GaAs, which operate in the near infrared spectral region [9

9. T. D. Happ, I. I. Tartakovskii, V. D. Kulakovskii, J.-P. Reithmaier, M. Kamp, and A. Forchel, “Enhanced light emission of InxGa1-xAs quantum dots in a two-dimensional photonic-crystal defect microcavity,” Phys. Rev. B 66, 041303(R) (2002). [CrossRef]

16

16. Z. Wu, Z. Mi, P. Bhattacharya, T. Zhu, and J. Xu, “Enhanced spontaneous emission at 1.55 µm from colloidal PbSe quantum dots in a Si photonic crystal microcavity,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 171105 (2007). [CrossRef]

]. Extending these experiments into the visible range of the spectrum poses a number of challenges, above all the need for a transparent material featuring a relatively high refractive index to provide sufficient optical confinement. (Al,In,Ga)N-based material systems are one possibility, allowing the fabrication of devices emitting in the ultra violet to green region [17

17. C. Meier, K. Hennessy, E. D. Haberer, R. Sharma, Y.-S. Choi, K. McGroddy, S. Keller, S. P. DenBaars, S. Nakamura, and E. L. Hu, “Visible resonant modes in GaN-based photonic crystal membrane cavities,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 031111 (2006). [CrossRef]

19

19. M. Arita, S. Ishida, S. Kako, S. Iwamoto, and Y. Arakawa, “AlN air-bridge photonic crystal nanocavities demonstrating high quality factor,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 051106 (2007). [CrossRef]

]. Red laser emission from AlGaInP/GaInP PC membranes has also been demonstrated [20

20. Z. Zhang, T. Yoshie, X. Zhu, J. Xu, and A. Scherer, “Visible two-dimensional photonic crystal slab laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 071102 (2006). [CrossRef]

]. However, the fabrication of these III/V semiconductor devices is expensive and still technologically challenging (especially concerning free-standing structures) and a direct integration with standard CMOS technology is not possible. Using organic materials is another possibility [21

21. M. Kitamura, S. Iwamoto, and Y. Arakawa, “Enhanced light emission from an organic photonic crystal with a nanocavity,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 151119 (2005). [CrossRef]

], allowing an easy doping of the PC material with a large number of different emitters (e.g., dye molecules or colloidal quantum dots), but usually suffering from relatively small refractive indices.

Recently, Makarova et al. [22

22. M. Makarova, J. Vučković, H. Sanda, and Y. Nishi, “Silicon-based photonic crystal nanocavity light emitters,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 221101 (2006). [CrossRef]

] investigated the emission from Si nanocrystals in Si-rich SiN PC membranes, demonstrating the potential of these structures as photonic building blocks in the yellow to red wavelength range. In comparison to III/V semiconductors the fabrication process of SiN PCs is fully compatible with standard CMOS technology, making the fabrication (even of free-standing structures) easy and cost-effective. Furthermore, SiN-based PCs are fully bio-compatible, paving the way for a number of bio-photonic applications. However, the cavity quality factors obtained so far were quite modest (200–300) [22

22. M. Makarova, J. Vučković, H. Sanda, and Y. Nishi, “Silicon-based photonic crystal nanocavity light emitters,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 221101 (2006). [CrossRef]

]. If the full spectrum of cavity QED effects is to become accessible with these kinds of structures, the quality factor has to be further optimized.

Here we report on studies of the well-known L3 cavity in SiN PC membranes. In Ref. 22 the large ratio of the hole radius r to the lattice constant a (r/a=0.4) allowed only to observe higher ordermodes, which are usuallymore lossy than the fundamentalmode and exhibit a smaller free spectral range. Therefore, we focus our attention on the fundamental cavity mode, optimizing the cavity design with respect to the quality factor, both theoretically and experimentally. Dye molecules, spin-cast on top of the membranes, are used as broadband light emitters which probe the mode structure of the cavities at room temperature and allow an easy determination of the corresponding quality factors. Using external emitters instead of intrinsic ones has the advantage that the full spectrum of emitters available in the corresponding wavelength range can be applied. Furthermore, different emitters can be used subsequently or in combination to cover different wavelength ranges.

The paper is organized as follows: A theoretical analysis of the quality factor of an optimized L3 cavity design is presented in Sec. 2. In Sec. 3 the fabrication procedure and preparation of the samples is described, also analyzing occurring fabrication imperfections. Furthermore, experimental details of the fluorescence measurements are given. In Sec. 4.1 a mode analysis based on the fluorescence measurements is performed, comparing the experimental peak positions of a simple L3 cavity to the predicted ones. This is followed by a detailed study of the quality factors of the optimized cavities in Sec. 4.2, including a discussion of the observed discrepancies to the simulation. Finally, Sec. 5 concludes our paper.

2. Numerical analysis

The L3 cavity, which basically consists of three missing holes in a row, is one of the most extensively studied types of PC cavities. This is mainly due to the fact that it supports a spectrally well separated fundamental mode with small mode volume (on the order of the cubic wavelength), whose quality factor can easily be optimized to relatively high values (>5×104 in Si-based PCs) by simply adjusting the surrounding holes of the cavity [23

23. Y. Akahane, T. Asano, B.-S. Song, and S. Noda, “High-Q photonic nanocavity in a two-dimensional photonic crystal,” Nature 425, 944–947 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 24

24. Y. Akahane, T. Asano, B.-S. Song, and S. Noda, “Fine-tuned high-Q photonic-crystal nanocavity,” Opt. Express 13, 1202–1214 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. However, this optimization was performed for high-index material systems and its applicability to low-index materials has to be justified. We therefore carried out a number of numerical simulations using a three-dimensional finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) algorithm. A schematic representation of the simulated cavity is shown in Fig. 1(a). The radius of the holes and the thickness of the PC membrane were r=0.3a and t=1a, respectively, where a is the lattice constant. The membrane itself was made of SiN for which a refractive index of n=2.01 was assumed. The lateral size of the whole PC structure was 28a×14√3a. It has to be noted that the dimension of the computational domain should not be chosen considerably smaller than that, since lateral losses are much more significant in such a low-index system compared to high index PCs due to the weaker lateral confinement. In our case, the applied dimensions coincide with those of the fabricated structures discussed later in this article.

Fig. 1. (a) Schematic representation of the cavity geometry. The surrounding holes of the L3 cavity have a reduced radius r (left and right holes, light red) and r (upper and lower holes, light green), respectively. Additionally, the left and right holes are displaced outwards by a distance d. (b) Absolute value of the electric field of the fundamental cavity mode in the central plane of the PC membrane. (c) Calculated quality factor for various values of r and d for a cavity with r=0.3a, t=1a, and r =0.3a. (d) Calculated quality factor as a function of r for the same cavity with fixed r and d.

We have investigated three different approaches to optimize the quality factor Q of the fundamental mode (Fig. 1(b)). First, the radius r of the left and right boundary holes was reduced and second, the holes were shifted outwards by a distance d. The impact on the quality factor can be seen in Fig. 1(c). A nearly five-fold enhancement of Q occurs for r =0.2a and d=0.2a. Further decrease of r or increase of d does not improve the quality factor significantly. Besides, too small hole radii or too large shifts can be problematic since a reliable and reproducible fabrication becomes more challenging. We therefore used these values (r =0.2a, d=0.2a) as a starting point for further optimization. Shifting the neighbor and next-neighbor holes to the left and right of the cavity (as had been done, e.g., in Ref. 24) did not lead to any significant improvement in our simulations. Instead, as a third approach, we altered the radius r of the upper and lower boundary holes of the cavity. The result is shown in Fig. 1(d). Obviously, an additional boost of Q by more than a factor of 2 can be achieved by slightly reducing r to about 0.25a, leading to a maximum quality factor of Q≈4700. The observed improvement of the quality factor results from the shift of the cavity boundaries away from the points of high field intensity. This leads to a smoother decay of the cavity mode into the surrounding PC structure and therefore to lower vertical losses. In the wave vector picture this is equivalent to the fact that the fraction of k vectors lying in the leaky region, i.e. those which are not confined by total internal reflection, is reduced [24

24. Y. Akahane, T. Asano, B.-S. Song, and S. Noda, “Fine-tuned high-Q photonic-crystal nanocavity,” Opt. Express 13, 1202–1214 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

According to the Purcell effect [25

25. E. M. Purcell, “Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies,” Phys. Rev. 69, 681 (1946).

] the spontaneous emission rate of an emitter, which is spectrally and spatially aligned with respect to the field maximum of the cavity mode, is enhanced by a factor

F=34π2(λn)3QV,
(1)

where λ is the peak wavelength of the mode, n=√ε is the refractive index of the membrane, and V is the mode volume. The latter can be calculated from

V=drε(r)E(r)2[ε(r)E(r)2]max,
(2)

with ε(r ) and E (r ) being the local dielectric constant and electric field, respectively. With a quality factor Q=4700 and a mode volume V=1.32(λ/n)3, as is calculated from our simulations, a maximum enhancement of the spontaneous emission rate of nearly 270 would be possible for an emitter placed at the center of the membrane. However, in our experiments emitters are located at the surfaces of the membrane, where the electric field intensity |E (r )|2 reaches only values of about 20% of the value |E (r )|2 max in the central plane. This reduces the possible Purcell factor to ≈50. Furthermore, the experimentally observed Purcell enhancement is usually only a fraction of the predicted one, as slight spatial and spectral misalignments can significantly reduce the coupling between cavity and emitter. Nonetheless, the numerical results are encouraging and suggest that cavity QED effects investigated in high-index PCs can also be achieved in such a low-index system. We thus fabricated and studied a series of L3 cavities and the coupling of emitters to them, as is presented in the following sections.

3. Sample fabrication and experimental setup

The PC structures were fabricated using low pressure chemical vapor deposited silicon nitride with a core thickness of 300 nm or 230 nm. As a carrier, 4 inch silicon h100i wafers with a 1.6 µm and 2.2 µm thick SiO2 cladding layer were used, respectively. The fabrication of the resonators occurred by means of electron beam lithography (EBL) and reactive ion etching (RIE). EBL was performed using a LEO 1560 equipped with a Nanomaker® pattern generator from Interface Company (Moscow). A single layer of 2.2M polymethylmethacrylate (thickness 150 nm) was patterned using a 30 kV electron beam, followed by 10 s development using AR 600-50 (Allresist, Berlin) and subsequent IPA rinse. For etching of the photonic structures a hard metallic mask was used, obtained by evaporating a 20 nm thick Ni layer and dissolving the resist using N,N-dimethylformamid. RIE was performed using an OXFORD Plasmalab 80 Plus RIE etcher. The etching process involved the use of fluorine-based radio frequency and inductively coupled plasma. A gas mixture of C4F8 and SF6 was used to vertically etch both the nitride and the oxide layers while simultaneously passivating the etched sidewalls. In order to achieve good thermal contact with the ground electrode, the substrates were glued (AZ MIR 701) to a 4 inch wafer. After RIE the remaining Ni mask was removed using a 10% solution of HCl. The final fabrication step involved the selective wet etching of the underlying oxide layer using a 50% solution of pure HF.

An example of a fabricated cavity with a lattice constant a=270 nm is shown in Fig. 2(a). From scanning electron microscope (SEM) images before and after the final etching process we conclude that the SiN is slightly etched by the HF solution, resulting in larger hole radii and smaller membrane thicknesses. Thus, starting from 300 nm and 230 nm thick SiN layers, the final structures had thicknesses of t≈270 nm and t≈200 nm, respectively. From the close-up image in Fig. 2(b) it can be seen that the holes have different radii at the top and bottom of the membrane, respectively, indicating a slightly conical shape. Thereby, the tilt of the hole walls (relative to the vertical direction) increases with decreasing hole radius, ranging from 4° to 8° throughout the samples. The impact of this type of fabrication imperfection will be discussed in Sec. 4.2.

Fig. 2. (a) SEM image of one of the fabricated SiN PC cavities. (b) A close-up view of the membrane holes. The conical shape of the holes, which gets more pronounced with decreasing hole radius, can clearly be seen.

After rinsing the samples in a 50:50 H2O2/H2SO4 mixture for several hours a solution of NileRed molecules (Molecular Probes) in ethanol (concentration ~10-6 M) was spin-cast on the membranes at 2000 rpm. The dye acts as a broadband emitter in the range between 600 nm and 750 nm. For excitation of the photoluminescence (PL) the 514 nm line of an Ar+ laser was used. The excitation light was focused onto the cavities through a 100×/0.9 NA microscope objective, forming a sub-micrometer spot on the sample surface. The excitation power was approximately 1 µW. The PL light was collected through the same objective and spatially filtered by a 100 nm pinhole. The light was than dispersed by a spectrograph (Acton SpectraPro 2500i) and detected with a liquid nitrogen cooled charge coupled device (Roper Scientific).

4. Experimental results and discussion

4.1. Mode analysis

We have fabricated a large variety of different PC structures, varying the hole radii r, r , and r , the hole shift d (see Fig. 1(a)), and the membrane thickness t. First, we analyze the general mode structure of the L3 cavity as seen in our experiments and compare it to the numerical simulations, before a detailed analysis of the corresponding quality factors is presented in Sec. 4.2. For simplicity we start with the simple L3 geometry, i.e. without any additional modifications. A number of PL spectra for different lattice parameters is shown in Fig. 3(a)–(d). Several peaks are observed in the detected emission spectrum, which shift to smaller wavelengths as r is increased or t is decreased. This clearly indicates the coupling of the dye molecules to the cavity modes. The peak corresponding to the fundamental mode (highlighted in red) can principally be tuned through the entire visible spectrum above 550 nm, although we have limited our studies to the wavelength range between 600 nm and 700 nm. As not all of the molecules were aligned in position and orientation to the cavity field to couple efficiently, a large background emission remained which closely resembles the unaltered reference spectrum (gray lines). Note that in our experiment we always determine the optical properties of the dye-loaded cavities, not the bare cavities. However, if we used lower dye concentrations (down to 10-8 M) the observed changes in the spectral position of the resonances were always below 0.1% and also the quality factor did not change within the accuracy of the measurement. Thus, we deduce that the influence of the dye on the optical properties of the cavity can be neglected for the present analysis.

Fig. 3. (a)–(d) PL spectra (black) from simple L3 cavities coated with NileRed. The lattice constant is a=270 nm. For clarity, the fundamental mode (TEy1) is highlighted in red. Corresponding reference spectra (gray) were recorded on the PC membrane away from the cavity and scaled to match the long wavelength part of the cavity spectrum. (e) Absolute value of the electric field of the first four cavity modes in the central plane of the PC membrane. (f) Comparison of the calculated peak wavelength of the cavity modes (lines) with the experimentally observed values (symbols). The lattice parameters are a=270 nm and t=1a.

To get a deeper insight into the observed mode structure we have compared the experimental peak positions to those of the calculated modes. In the FDTD simulation we found four modes lying within the TE bandgap of the PC membrane, two of them dominantly polarized in x-direction (denoted as TEx1 and TEx2) and y-direction (denoted as TEy1 and TEy2), respectively. The corresponding mode patterns are displayed in Fig. 3(e). In Fig. 3(f) the theoretical behavior of these four modes is shown as a function of r together with the experimentally obtained peak positions. Note that the indicated value of r for the fabricated structures is an effective hole radius, as the holes are in fact conical. Contrary to this, our simulations were carried out assuming perfect cylinders. However, simulations with conical holes indicate that the resulting mode structure can well be described by an effective hole radius. This assumption is supported by the excellent agreement between the experimental and theoretical data shown in Fig. 3(f).

It should be mentioned that apart from the resonances depicted in Fig. 3(f) several other peaks occur in some of the spectra. The most prominent one can be seen adjacent to the fundamental mode in Fig. 3(a) and Fig. 3(b). The origin of this resonance is currently unknown. It was not observed on the bare PCmembrane (i.e. away fromthe cavity) and thus seems to be linked to the cavity. An interesting feature of this resonance is its quality factor Q~800, usually exceeding that of all other modes except for the best optimized cavities (see Sec. 4.2). It exhibits a clearly y-polarized emission, as is seen from polarization-selected PL measurements. We were not able to reproduce the unidentified resonance in our numerical simulations. Even if the conical shape of the holes is taken into account no additional modes occur that match the observed one. We were also able to rule out higher order slab modes as well as an influence of the dye, since the resonance seems to be independent of the dye concentration and is reproducible even if well separated dye-doped polystyrene beads (20 nm diameter) are used as emitters instead of a homogeneous film of molecules. Measurements on other types of cavities (L1 and L2) showed a similar phenomenon. Further investigations on the nature of this unidentified resonance are necessary, since it may provide an interesting alternative to the well-known cavity modes, once its origin and properties are understood.

4.2. Optimization of the quality factor

The quality factor of the fundamental mode can be determined from the measured spectra by fitting a Lorentzian to the experimental data. For the simple L3 geometry the obtained values are limited to Q~300–350. Based on the results of the numerical simulation we fabricated and measured a series of optimized L3 cavities by varying the hole radius r and the hole shift d. The results are shown in Fig. 4(a). As expected, the quality factor increases with decreasing r and growing d. Further improvement can be achieved by reducing the hole radius r , as is seen from measurements on another series of cavities (Fig. 4(b)). The error bars in both figures result from uncertainties in the determination of d and r from SEM images, respectively. The best quality factor obtained so far was Q=1460. The corresponding PL spectrum is shown in Fig. 4(c), together with two polarization-selected measurements, clearly demonstrating the dominant linear polarization of the emission from the different cavity modes. If we assume that the fundamental mode has indeed a mode volume of V≈1.3(λ/n)3 (see Sec. 2), a quality factor of Q=1460 would give rise to a maximum Purcell factor of 17 for an emitter at the surface of the PC membrane. However, this only holds for emitters with an emission linewidth comparable to or smaller than the width of the cavity resonance. This is certainly not fulfilled in the experiments shown here due to the broadband emission of the dye molecules. Consequently, in future experiments emitters with a much narrower emission width should be employed to achieve more pronounced cavity QED effects.

The obtained quality factors are considerably smaller than the calculated ones (see Fig. 1(c) and Fig. 1(d)), most likely due to imperfections of the fabricated structures. If we decompose the measured Q total into two components, namely Q ideal of the idealized, simulated structure and Q loss being composed of all additional losses, then Q loss can be determined from the calculated and measured values using Q -1 loss=Q -1 total-Q -1 ideal. Assuming Q loss to be independent of r , d, and r we have plotted a corrected theoretical estimation of the quality factor in Fig. 4(a) and Fig. 4(b) (dashed lines), showing reasonable agreement with the experimentally observed behavior.

Fig. 4. (a) Experimentally obtained quality factors (symbols) of the fundamental mode for a series of L3 cavities with a=270 nm, r=0.29a, t=1a, and various values of r and d. The dashed lines represent the corresponding theoretical predictions. (b) Achieved quality factors for another series of L3 cavities with a=270 nm, r=0.3a, and t=0.74a, where r has been modified in addition to r and d. (c) PL (black) and reference (gray) spectra from the cavity displaying the best quality factor in (b). The two lower spectra were recorded with polarization filtering, clearly demonstrating the dominant polarization of the different cavity modes. The inset shows the TEy1 peak and a corresponding Lorentzian fit.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have investigated the spontaneous emission from dye molecules on SiN photonic crystal nanocavities, probing the mode structure and quality factor of the cavities. A mode analysis yields good agreement between the calculated and observed spectral positions of the modes, but reveals also some unknown high-Q resonance which still needs to be identified. Theoretically, quality factors as high as 4700 are predicted after optimization of the cavity geometry, while experimentally Q values of nearly 1500 were achieved. The main source of the discrepancy between experiment and simulation is found in the tilt of the hole walls, leading to additional cavity losses. Improvements in the fabrication procedure may thus lead to a further boost of the quality factor.

Keeping in mind that these photonic crystal cavities can operate in the entire visible wavelength range above 550 nm, they provide a powerful tool to carry recent experiments on cavity QED effects into the visible spectrum. This is particularly appealing since a large number of different types of emitters exists in this spectral region, e.g. dye molecules, colloidal quantum dots, or color centers in diamond nanocrystals. Especially the latter are promising single photon sources [29

29. A. Beveratos, R. Brouri, T. Gacoin, A. Villing, J.-P. Poizat, and P. Grangier, “Single photon quantum cryptography,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 187901 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] whose efficiency could be greatly enhanced once coupling to a nanocavity is achieved. As was already pointed out, the fabrication of SiN photonic structures is fully compatible with existing CMOS technology, making a cost-effective integration into complex optoelectronic devices feasible.

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by the EFRE program of the European Union.

References and links

1.

T. Yoshie, A. Scherer, J. Hendrickson, G. Khitrova, H. M. Gibbs, G. Rupper, C. Ell, O. B. Shchekin, and D. G. Deppe, “Vacuum rabi splitting with a single quantum dot in a photonic crystal nanocavity,” Nature 432, 200–203 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2.

K. Hennessy, A. Badolato, M. Winger, D. Gerace, M. Atatüre, S. Gulde, S. Fält, E. L. Hu, and A. Imamoǧlu, “Quantum nature of a strongly coupled single quantum dot-cavity system,” Nature 445, 896–899 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3.

A. Badolato, K. Hennessy, M. Atatüre, J. Dreiser, E. L. Hu, P. M. Petroff, and A. Imamoǧlu, “Deterministic coupling of single quantum dots to single nanocavity modes,” Science 308, 1158–1161 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4.

D. Englund, D. Fattal, E. Waks, G. Solomon, B. Zhang, T. Nakaoda, Y. Arakawa, Y. Yamamoto, and J. Vučković, “Controlling the spontaneous emission rate of single quantum dots in a two-dimensional photonic crystal,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 013904 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5.

O. Painter, R. K. Lee, A. Scherer, A. Yariv, J. D. O’Brien, P. D. Dapkus, and I. Kim, “Two-dimensional photonic band-gap defect mode laser,” Science 284, 1819–1821 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6.

K. Nozaki, S. Kita, and T. Baba, “Room temperature continuous wave operation and controlled spontaneous emission in ultrasmall photonic crystal nanolaser,” Opt. Express 15, 7506–7514 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7.

S. Laurent, S. Varoutsis, L. Le Gratiet, A. Lemaître, I. Sagnes, F. Raineri, A. Levenson, I. Robert-Philip, and I. Abram, “Indistinguishable single photons from a single-quantum dot in a two-dimensional photonic crystal cavity,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 163107 (2005). [CrossRef]

8.

J. Vučković, D. Englund, D. Fattal, E. Waks, and Y. Yamamoto, “Generation and manipulation of nonclassical light using photonic crystals,” Physica E 32, 466–470 (2006). [CrossRef]

9.

T. D. Happ, I. I. Tartakovskii, V. D. Kulakovskii, J.-P. Reithmaier, M. Kamp, and A. Forchel, “Enhanced light emission of InxGa1-xAs quantum dots in a two-dimensional photonic-crystal defect microcavity,” Phys. Rev. B 66, 041303(R) (2002). [CrossRef]

10.

A. Kress, F. Hofbauer, N. Reinelt, M. Kaniber, H. J. Krenner, R. Meyer, G. Böhm, and J. J. Finley, “Manipulation of the spontaneous emission dynamics of quantum dots in two-dimensional photonic crystals,” Phys. Rev. B 71, 241304(R) (2005). [CrossRef]

11.

W.-Y. Chen, W.-H. Chang, H.-S. Chang, T. M. Hsu, C.-C. Lee, C.-C. Chen, P. G. Luan, J.-Y. Chang, T.-P. Hsieh, and J.-I. Chyi, “Enhanced light emission from InAs quantum dots in single-defect photonic crystal microcavities at room temperature,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 071111 (2005). [CrossRef]

12.

I. Fushman, D. Englund, and J. Vučković, “Coupling of PbS quantum dots to photonic crystal cavities at room temperature,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 241102 (2005). [CrossRef]

13.

D. G. Gevaux, A. J. Bennett, R. M. Stevenson, A. J. Shields, P. Atkinson, J. Griffiths, D. Anderson, G. A. C. Jones, and D. A. Ritchie, “Enhancement and suppression of spontaneous emission by temperature tuning InAs quantum dots to photonic crystal cavities,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 131101 (2006). [CrossRef]

14.

J. S. Xia, Y. Ikegami, Y. Shiraki, N. Usami, and Y. Nakata, “Strong resonant luminescence from Ge quantum dots in photonic crystal microcavity at room temperature,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 201102 (2006). [CrossRef]

15.

R. Bose, X. Yang, R. Chatterjee, J. Gao, and C. W. Wong, “Weak coupling interactions of colloidal lead sulfide nanocrystals with silicon photonic crystal nanocavities near 1.55 µm at room temperature,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 111117 (2007). [CrossRef]

16.

Z. Wu, Z. Mi, P. Bhattacharya, T. Zhu, and J. Xu, “Enhanced spontaneous emission at 1.55 µm from colloidal PbSe quantum dots in a Si photonic crystal microcavity,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 171105 (2007). [CrossRef]

17.

C. Meier, K. Hennessy, E. D. Haberer, R. Sharma, Y.-S. Choi, K. McGroddy, S. Keller, S. P. DenBaars, S. Nakamura, and E. L. Hu, “Visible resonant modes in GaN-based photonic crystal membrane cavities,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 031111 (2006). [CrossRef]

18.

Y.-S. Choi, K. Hennessy, R. Sharma, E. Haberer, Y. Gao, S. P. DenBaars, S. Nakamura, E. L. Hu, and C. Meier, “GaN blue photonic crystal membrane nanocavities,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 243101 (2005). [CrossRef]

19.

M. Arita, S. Ishida, S. Kako, S. Iwamoto, and Y. Arakawa, “AlN air-bridge photonic crystal nanocavities demonstrating high quality factor,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 051106 (2007). [CrossRef]

20.

Z. Zhang, T. Yoshie, X. Zhu, J. Xu, and A. Scherer, “Visible two-dimensional photonic crystal slab laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 071102 (2006). [CrossRef]

21.

M. Kitamura, S. Iwamoto, and Y. Arakawa, “Enhanced light emission from an organic photonic crystal with a nanocavity,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 151119 (2005). [CrossRef]

22.

M. Makarova, J. Vučković, H. Sanda, and Y. Nishi, “Silicon-based photonic crystal nanocavity light emitters,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 221101 (2006). [CrossRef]

23.

Y. Akahane, T. Asano, B.-S. Song, and S. Noda, “High-Q photonic nanocavity in a two-dimensional photonic crystal,” Nature 425, 944–947 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

24.

Y. Akahane, T. Asano, B.-S. Song, and S. Noda, “Fine-tuned high-Q photonic-crystal nanocavity,” Opt. Express 13, 1202–1214 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

25.

E. M. Purcell, “Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies,” Phys. Rev. 69, 681 (1946).

26.

T. Asano, B.-S. Song, and S. Noda, “Analysis of the experimental Q-factors (~1 million) of photonic crystal nanocavities,” Opt. Express 14, 1996–2002 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

27.

Y. Tanaka, T. Asano, Y. Akahane, B.-S. Song, and S. Noda, “Theoretical investigation of a two-dimensional photonic crystal slab with truncated cone air holes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 1661–1663 (2003). [CrossRef]

28.

M.-K. Kim, J.-K. Yang, Y.-H. Lee, and I.-K. Hwang, “Influence of etching slope on two-dimensional photonic crystal slab resonators,” J. Korean Phys. Soc. 50, 1027–1031 (2007). [CrossRef]

29.

A. Beveratos, R. Brouri, T. Gacoin, A. Villing, J.-P. Poizat, and P. Grangier, “Single photon quantum cryptography,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 187901 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

OCIS Codes
(170.6280) Medical optics and biotechnology : Spectroscopy, fluorescence and luminescence
(230.3990) Optical devices : Micro-optical devices
(230.4000) Optical devices : Microstructure fabrication
(230.5750) Optical devices : Resonators
(230.6080) Optical devices : Sources
(300.2140) Spectroscopy : Emission

ToC Category:
Photonic Crystal Cavities

History
Original Manuscript: September 21, 2007
Revised Manuscript: October 24, 2007
Manuscript Accepted: October 24, 2007
Published: December 10, 2007

Virtual Issues
Vol. 3, Iss. 1 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics
Physics and Applications of Microresonators (2007) Optics Express

Citation
Michael Barth, Josef Kouba, Johannes Stingl, Bernd Löchel, and Oliver Benson, "Modification of visible spontaneous emission with silicon nitride photonic crystal nanocavities," Opt. Express 15, 17231-17240 (2007)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/vjbo/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-15-25-17231


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. T. Yoshie, A. Scherer, J. Hendrickson, G. Khitrova, H. M. Gibbs, G. Rupper, C. Ell, O. B. Shchekin, and D. G. Deppe, "Vacuum rabi splitting with a single quantum dot in a photonic crystal nanocavity," Nature 432, 200-203 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. K. Hennessy, A. Badolato, M. Winger, D. Gerace, M. Atatüre, S. Gulde, S. Fält, E. L. Hu, and A. Imamoğlu, "Quantum nature of a strongly coupled single quantum dot-cavity system," Nature 445, 896-899 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. A. Badolato, K. Hennessy, M. Atatüre, J. Dreiser, E. L. Hu, P. M. Petroff, and A. Imamoğlu, "Deterministic coupling of single quantum dots to single nanocavity modes," Science 308, 1158-1161 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. D. Englund, D. Fattal, E. Waks, G. Solomon, B. Zhang, T. Nakaoda, Y. Arakawa, Y. Yamamoto, and J. Vučković, "Controlling the spontaneous emission rate of single quantum dots in a two-dimensional photonic crystal," Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 013904 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. O. Painter, R. K. Lee, A. Scherer, A. Yariv, J. D. O’Brien, P. D. Dapkus, and I. Kim, "Two-dimensional photonic band-gap defect mode laser," Science 284, 1819-1821 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. K. Nozaki, S. Kita, and T. Baba, "Room temperature continuous wave operation and controlled spontaneous emission in ultrasmall photonic crystal nanolaser," Opt. Express 15, 7506-7514 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. S. Laurent, S. Varoutsis, L. Le Gratiet, A. Lemaître, I. Sagnes, F. Raineri, A. Levenson, I. Robert-Philip, and I. Abram, "Indistinguishable single photons from a single-quantum dot in a two-dimensional photonic crystal cavity," Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 163107 (2005). [CrossRef]
  8. J. Vučković, D. Englund, D. Fattal, E. Waks, and Y. Yamamoto, "Generation and manipulation of nonclassical light using photonic crystals," Physica E 32, 466-470 (2006). [CrossRef]
  9. T. D. Happ, I. I. Tartakovskii, V. D. Kulakovskii, J.-P. Reithmaier, M. Kamp, and A. Forchel, "Enhanced light emission of InxGa1−xAs quantum dots in a two-dimensional photonic-crystal defect microcavity," Phys. Rev. B 66, 041303(R) (2002). [CrossRef]
  10. A. Kress, F. Hofbauer, N. Reinelt,M. Kaniber, H. J. Krenner, R.Meyer, G. B¨ohm, and J. J. Finley, "Manipulation of the spontaneous emission dynamics of quantum dots in two-dimensional photonic crystals," Phys. Rev. B 71, 241304(R) (2005). [CrossRef]
  11. W.-Y. Chen, W.-H. Chang, H.-S. Chang, T. M. Hsu, C.-C. Lee, C.-C. Chen, P. G. Luan, J.-Y. Chang, T.-P. Hsieh, and J.-I. Chyi, "Enhanced light emission from InAs quantum dots in single-defect photonic crystal microcavities at room temperature," Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 071111 (2005). [CrossRef]
  12. I. Fushman, D. Englund, and J. Vučković, "Coupling of PbS quantum dots to photonic crystal cavities at room temperature," Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 241102 (2005). [CrossRef]
  13. D. G. Gevaux, A. J. Bennett, R. M. Stevenson, A. J. Shields, P. Atkinson, J. Griffiths, D. Anderson, G. A. C. Jones, and D. A. Ritchie, "Enhancement and suppression of spontaneous emission by temperature tuning InAs quantum dots to photonic crystal cavities," Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 131101 (2006). [CrossRef]
  14. J. S. Xia, Y. Ikegami, Y. Shiraki, N. Usami, and Y. Nakata, "Strong resonant luminescence from Ge quantum dots in photonic crystal microcavity at room temperature," Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 201102 (2006). [CrossRef]
  15. R. Bose, X. Yang, R. Chatterjee, J. Gao, and C. W. Wong, "Weak coupling interactions of colloidal lead sulfide nanocrystals with silicon photonic crystal nanocavities near 1.55 μm at room temperature," Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 111117 (2007). [CrossRef]
  16. Z. Wu, Z. Mi, P. Bhattacharya, T. Zhu, and J. Xu, "Enhanced spontaneous emission at 1.55 μm from colloidal PbSe quantum dots in a Si photonic crystal microcavity," Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 171105 (2007). [CrossRef]
  17. C. Meier, K. Hennessy, E. D. Haberer, R. Sharma, Y.-S. Choi, K. McGroddy, S. Keller, S. P. DenBaars, S. Nakamura, and E. L. Hu, "Visible resonant modes in GaN-based photonic crystal membrane cavities," Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 031111 (2006). [CrossRef]
  18. Y.-S. Choi, K. Hennessy, R. Sharma, E. Haberer, Y. Gao, S. P. DenBaars, S. Nakamura, E. L. Hu, and C. Meier, "GaN blue photonic crystal membrane nanocavities," Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 243101 (2005). [CrossRef]
  19. M. Arita, S. Ishida, S. Kako, S. Iwamoto, and Y. Arakawa, "AlN air-bridge photonic crystal nanocavities demonstrating high quality factor," Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 051106 (2007). [CrossRef]
  20. Z. Zhang, T. Yoshie, X. Zhu, J. Xu, and A. Scherer, "Visible two-dimensional photonic crystal slab laser," Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 071102 (2006). [CrossRef]
  21. M. Kitamura, S. Iwamoto, and Y. Arakawa, "Enhanced light emission from an organic photonic crystal with a nanocavity," Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 151119 (2005). [CrossRef]
  22. M. Makarova, J. Vuˇckovi´c, H. Sanda, and Y. Nishi, "Silicon-based photonic crystal nanocavity light emitters," Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 221101 (2006). [CrossRef]
  23. Y. Akahane, T. Asano, B.-S. Song, and S. Noda, "High-Q photonic nanocavity in a two-dimensional photonic crystal," Nature 425, 944-947 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Y. Akahane, T. Asano, B.-S. Song, and S. Noda, "Fine-tuned high-Q photonic-crystal nanocavity," Opt. Express 13, 1202-1214 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. E. M. Purcell, "Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies," Phys. Rev. 69, 681 (1946).
  26. T. Asano, B.-S. Song, and S. Noda, "Analysis of the experimental Q-factors (~ 1 million) of photonic crystal nanocavities," Opt. Express 14, 1996-2002 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Y. Tanaka, T. Asano, Y. Akahane, B.-S. Song, and S. Noda, "Theoretical investigation of a two-dimensional photonic crystal slab with truncated cone air holes," Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 1661-1663 (2003). [CrossRef]
  28. M.-K. Kim, J.-K. Yang, Y.-H. Lee, and I.-K. Hwang, "Influence of etching slope on two-dimensional photonic crystal slab resonators," J. Korean Phys. Soc. 50, 1027-1031 (2007). [CrossRef]
  29. A. Beveratos, R. Brouri, T. Gacoin, A. Villing, J.-P. Poizat, and P. Grangier, "Single photon quantum cryptography," Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 187901 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1. Fig. 2. Fig. 3.
 
Fig. 4.
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited