OSA's Digital Library

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

| EXPLORING THE INTERFACE OF LIGHT AND BIOMEDICINE

  • Editor: Gregory W. Faris
  • Vol. 5, Iss. 12 — Sep. 30, 2010
« Show journal navigation

High-resolution intracellular viscosity measurement using time-dependent fluorescence anisotropy

Wesley C. Parker, Nilay Chakraborty, Regina Vrikkis, Gloria Elliott, Stuart Smith, and Patrick J. Moyer  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 18, Issue 16, pp. 16607-16617 (2010)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.016607


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1055 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

A low-cost pulsed laser is used in conjunction with a homebuilt laser confocal-scanning epifluorescence microscope having submicron lateral and axial spatial resolution to determine cytoplasmic viscosity at specific intracytoplasmic locations in J774 mouse macrophage cells. Time-dependent fluorescence anisotropy measurements are made at each location and global deconvolution techniques are used to determine rotational correlation times. These rotational correlation times are related to the hydrated volume of 8-hydroxyperene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid (HPTS) to calculate viscosity at specific points inside the cell. In the cytoplasmic areas measured, rotational correlation times of HPTS ranged from 0.186 ns to 0.411 ns, corresponding to viscosities ranging from 1.00 +/− 0.03 cP to 2.21+/− 0.05 cP.

© 2010 OSA

1. Introduction

Storage in a dry or anhydrous state involves removing water from the cellular samples so that the intracellular molecular mobility decreases and degradative biochemical processes are slowed. Glass forming sugars such as trehalose are generally introduced into the intracellular space to decrease mobility of molecules within the cell and encourage the formation of a glassy state at low moisture contents thereby minimizing adverse reactions that can lead to degradation of the cell. Sugars can also provide specific protection to biomolecules and membranes during processing for dry preservation [2

2. N. Chakraborty, D. Biswas, W. Parker, P. Moyer, and G. D. Elliott, “A role for microwave processing in the dry preservation of mammalian cells,” Biotechnol. Bioeng. 100(4), 782–796 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5

5. A. Eroglu, G. Elliott, D. L. Wright, M. Toner, and T. L. Toth, “Progressive elimination of microinjected trehalose during mouse embryonic development,” Reprod. Biomed. Online 10(4), 503–510 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. One of the challenges to achieving this level of protection is the difficulty in attaining suitable levels of protectants inside the cell. A variety of methods are frequently employed to transport trehalose across the cell membrane, including fluid phase endocytosis [2

2. N. Chakraborty, D. Biswas, W. Parker, P. Moyer, and G. D. Elliott, “A role for microwave processing in the dry preservation of mammalian cells,” Biotechnol. Bioeng. 100(4), 782–796 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] and various poration techniques [3

3. J. P. Acker, X. M. Lu, V. Young, S. Cheley, H. Bayley, A. Fowler, and M. Toner, “Measurement of trehalose loading of mammalian cells porated with a metal-actuated switchable pore,” Biotechnol. Bioeng. 82(5), 525–532 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,4

4. G. D. Elliott, X. H. Liu, J. L. Cusick, M. Menze, J. Vincent, T. Witt, S. Hand, and M. Toner, “Trehalose uptake through P2X7 purinergic channels provides dehydration protection,” Cryobiology 52(1), 114–127 (2006). [CrossRef]

]. Unfortunately the methods for assessing trehalose uptake generally yield average values in a population, as opposed to a specific distribution within a population or within a cell. If the change in intracellular mobility can be effectively measured as trehalose is loaded into the intracellular space, an experimental relationship can be established between the intracellular viscosity and intracellular trehalose concentration. This relationship is highly relevant in determining the nature of cellular protection, as methods are developed to protect cells against desiccation stresses during dry processing. In this paper, we demonstrate an approach for determining the localized intracellular viscosity with high resolution time-dependent laser-scanning confocal microscopy.

There are two broad approaches to determining intracellular viscosity: the first makes use of mechanical techniques [6

6. D. Weihs, T. G. Mason, and M. A. Teitell, “Bio-microrheology: a frontier in microrheology,” Biophys. J. 91(11), 4296–4305 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Indirect mechanical methods are mostly based upon manipulating the extracellular membrane (i.e., deforming the membrane) and the intracellular viscosity is measured indirectly by examining the response of the cell to the deformation. While these techniques are useful to characterize cellular membranes, they do not provide a direct way to measure viscosities at specific points within the cell. Early direct mechanical methods of observing cell viscosity utilized the insertion of magnetic beads into the cell. The beads were magnetically dragged through the cell, the shear rates of the molecules were observed through a microscope objective and the shear rate of the beads were analyzed. The measured viscosity of the cell in these experiments varied widely, from 10 cP to as much as 108 cP [7

7. F. H. C. Crick and A. F. W. Hughes, “The physical properties of cytoplasm: A study by means of the magnetic particle method Part I. Experimental,” Exp. Cell Res. 1(1), 37–80 (1950). [CrossRef]

11

11. M. Sato, T. Z. Wong, D. T. Brown, and R. D. Allen, “Rheological properties of living cytoplasm - A preliminary investigation of squid axoplasm (Loligo Pealei),” Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 4(1), 7–23 (1984). [CrossRef]

].

In the laboratory, the measurement of fluorescence anisotropy is complicated by the efficiency of the detection channel for horizontally polarized light relative to vertically polarized light. This efficiency effect is usually accounted for by the g-factor. The g-factor can be taken into account by modifying Eq. (1) so that we write
r(t)=I||(t)gI(t)I||(t)+2gI(t).
(5)
We can measure the g-factor experimentally by measuring the polarized emission components parallel and perpendicular to the vertically polarized excitation beam, and then measuring the polarized emission components relative to a horizontally polarized excitation beam. We then compute a value for g under the assumption that r(t) should be the same for both excitation polarizations, provided that the sample has no preferential alignment of the ensemble excitation dipoles. This is a valid approach for our samples. The results of this computation depend on the experimental geometry. For our experimental arrangement, we find that the g-factor is
g=vvhvvhhh
(6)
where vvis the maximum intensity of the vertically polarized emission parallel to vertically polarized excitation, hvis the maximum intensity of the horizontally polarized emission perpendicular to vertically polarized excitation, vhis the maximum intensity of the vertically polarized emission parallel to horizontally polarized excitation, and hhis the maximum intensity of the horizontally polarized emission parallel to horizontally polarized excitation. Determining g by this method is preferred, but in our cell imaging experiments we found that it was not always practical, due to the need to make large numbers of measurements quickly. We chose to include the g-factor in our fitting algorithm as a fitting parameter. We checked this assumption by measuring the g-factor using the experimental method described above, and then comparing that measurement with the fitted value of g. In one experiment, we found that the calculated value of g was 0.552, while the fitted value of g was 0.541. This gives an error of around 2.5%. This was a typical result. We did find that g varied from coverslip to coverslip, but multiple measurements on one coverslip yielded similar values for g. We attribute this to positional variations in coverslips.

In this work, we present an instrument, experimental data collection method, and data deconvolution method for mapping intracellular viscosity with sub-micron lateral and axial spatial resolution. In order to effectively determine quantitative viscosity of the intracellular region, we first calibrate the molecular rotational correlation time of our chosen fluorophore (HPTS, or pyranine) with known viscosity solutions of trehalose in water. We then construct a calibration curve which is used to generate a value for intracellular viscosity using the rotational behavior of the same fluorophore.

2. Current experimental setup

For the calibration phase of our study, the emitted fluorescence passes through a 535/40nm bandpass filter and then through a polarizing beam splitter, which allows us to measure polarized emission components parallel and perpendicular to the excitation beam. These polarized components are focused onto two MPD-series single photon avalanche diodes (SPAD), allowing us to measure the polarized emission components simultaneously using a TimeHarp 200 card (PicoQuant). Neutral density filters are used in front of the detector to prevent detector saturation (only for calibration purposes), and the optical path and detectors were optically shielded to prevent scattered light from the laser or from the emission to enter the detectors, causing a depolarization artifact.

For cell imaging and anisotropy measurements, a motorized flip mirror is added in the detection path, which deflects the emission beam to an EG&G SPAD. Photon counts from the SPAD are collected by the Nanoscope III controller, which is used to image the cells. Once we identified areas of interest within the cell, we park at the regions of interest, and the flip mirror is rotated to allow the beam to pass into the polarizing beam splitter and from there into the MPD detectors to measure fluorescence anisotropy.

We prepared samples of various viscosities of aqueous α-α-trehalose solutions by using a solution of 10 mM HPTS in deionized (DI) water. To make each sample, we weighed specific amounts of α-α-trehalose dihydride powder, dissolved that into the HPTS DI water, and weighed the resulting solution. We then determined the weight-weight% ratio of trehalose in the sample.

To determine the local mobility in the intracellular space of trehalose-loaded mouse J774 cells, the cells were incubated in loading buffer (0.7mM CaCI2, 1.1 mM MgC12, 2.7 mM KCI, 1.5 mM KH2PO4, 138 mM NaCI, and 8.1 mM Na2HPO4) containing 10 mM HPTS probe for 15 min. Cells were then washed 5 times and resuspended in the buffer. A droplet of cells in solution (20 μL) was placed on a glass cover slip and incubated for 15 min to allow cells to loosely attach before imaging. The cover slip was placed in a sample holder and was covered in buffer solution to prevent cell dehydration while measurements were made.

3. Experimental results

We first calculated the viscosity of the various aqueous trehalose solutions we made. The area number of published references giving viscosity measurements for aqueous α-α-trehalose [28

28. M. Rampp, C. Buttersack, and H. D. Lüdemann, “c,T-dependence of the viscosity and the self-diffusion coefficients in some aqueous carbohydrate solutions,” Carbohydr. Res. 328(4), 561–572 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

32

32. S. Magazu, G. Maisano, P. Migliardo, and V. Villari, “Experimental simulation of macromolecules in trehalose aqueous solutions: A photon correlation spectroscopy study,” J. Chem. Phys. 111(19), 9086–9092 (1999). [CrossRef]

], and this data has been fit to the Génotelle equation to determine the viscosity of trehalose as a function of temperature and mole fraction of sugar [33

33. J. Génotelle, “Expression de la viscosité des solutions sucrées,” Industries Alimentaires et Agricoles 95, 747–755 (1978).

]. The Génotelle equation is empirically written as
log10(ηη*)=a1+a2+ϕ(b1+b2xn)
(7)
whereϕ=(30+t)/(91t)is an empirically determined correction factor for temperature, η* is the viscosity of water, x is the mole fraction of trehalose, t is the temperature in degrees Centigrade, and a1, a2, b1, b2,and n are fitting coefficients with values of −0.159, 26.4, 1.31, 30.9, and 1.2 respectively, as given in [34

34. M. P. Longinotti and H. R. Corti, “Viscosity of concentrated sucrose and trehalose aqueous solutions including the supercooled regime,” J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 37(3), 1503–1515 (2008). [CrossRef]

]. Our samples ranged from 0 wt/wt% to 40.19 wt/wt%. Figure 2
Fig. 2 Calculated viscosity of trehalose samples as a function of the ratio of the weight of trehalose to the weight of the solution.
shows a calculated calibration curve based on the Genotelle equation that we will use to relate measured rotational correlation times of HPTS with actual viscosity of known solutions. This will then allow us to measure rotational correlation times in cells and directly relate them to local environmental viscosity.

We then determined the rotational correlation times for HPTS is each of our aqueous trehalose samples. This analysis is complicated by the instrument response function (IRF) of the laser, confocal microscope, and detectors. The intensities shown in Eq. (2) assume that the sample is excited instantaneously. In the lab, the excitation pulse from the laser is not a delta function (in time); there is always a finite temporal broadening of the pulse, and likewise, there is a measurable response time for the SPADs. This means that the lifetimes we measure in the lab are a convolution of the instrument response function of our system with the actual fluorescence lifetimes of the sample. It is necessary to measure the IRF of our microscope in order to recover the non-convolved fluorescent lifetimes of the sample.

We measure the IRF by scattering the laser off a clean cover slip and into our detectors, using neutral density filters in the detection sample to avoid damaging the detectors and to prevent photon pile-up. We then measure the time-resolved intensity from this scattered light. This allows us to determine the time-resolved IRF of our microscope as shown in Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Measured instrument response curve for parallel and perpendicular channels (normalized).
. One potential problem with this method is that it is possible to get reflections of the initial IRF in the data, and in fact, we do see some evidence of that in the perpendicular trace of the IRF. The amplitude of these reflections is minor, barely above the background, so we chose to accept this IRF.

It would be tempting at this point to do a simple deconvolution of the measured fluorescent lifetimes and the measured IRF. Unfortunately, the measured photon counts also include noise from the detectors, so a simple deconvolution of the IRF and the measured photon counts is not sufficient to recover the decay curves of Eqs. (2). A better technique is iterative reconvolution: we start with initial seed values for the coefficients in Eqs. (2) and construct model decay equations. These model decay functions are convolved with the measured IRF of our system. These convolved model functions are fit simultaneously to the parallel and perpendicular measured lifetime component photon counts with a nonlinear least-squares method in MATLAB to obtain the rotational correlation times of the fluorophore in the sample [35

35. A. J. Cross and G. R. Fleming, “Analysis of time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy decays,” Biophys. J. 46(1), 45–56 (1984). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

37

37. S. R. Flom and J. H. Fendler, “Global Analysis of Fluorescence Depolarization Experiments,” J. Phys. Chem. 92(21), 5908–5913 (1988). [CrossRef]

]. This iterative reconvolution process is essential to obtaining accurate rotational correlation times, particularly for rotational correlation times less than the width of the IRF.

Figure 3 shows the IRF measured for both channels for the calibration phase of our experiment. Before the data analysis is performed, the background (measured as the average number of counts for each channel in the first 50 bins) is subtracted from the relevant channel. This adjusted IRF is convolved with decay curves modeled on Eqs. (2) with initial estimated values for the amplitude, g, θ, ro and τ. After reiterative convolution and global fitting, the fitted fluorescence anisotropy curves are plotted, and values for g, θ, ro and τ are obtained. In order to provide a clearer picture of our deconvolution method, we show measured data in Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Deconvolved fluorescene anisotropy curve showing measured data (green and blue curves) and fitted anisotropy curves.
. This particular measured data is from a sample of 4.61 wt/wt% aqueous trehalose, with θ = 0.174 ns, ro = 0.25, and τ = 5.38 ns. The 95% confidence intervals for θ, and τ are 0.171 ns to 0.177 ns and 5.371 ns to 5.385 ns, respectively, with a χ2 = 1.41.

Background fluorescence, for example from autofluorescence from the cell, is ignored based on the following evidence. First, for this set of experiments we attempted to image cells in the same spectral region that were not loaded with HPTS fluorophore and had little to no success locating the cells using the same imaging parameters as used in the experiments above. Further, the radiative lifetime of the measured fluorescence (5.38 ns as quoted above) is very close to the 5.4 ns radiative lifetime of HPTS in water, thus indicating that the measured fluorescence of our experiments is dominated by the HPTS fluorophore. We must be clear in our discussion of background fluorescence. In our experiments presented with this data, autofluorescence was negligible. However, this is not always the case. Variations in cell nutrients and other reagents used in cell culturing lead to variations in observed fluorescence background.

In our calibration experiments we made a fluorescence anisotropy measurement at three different locations within each sample, determined the rotational correlation time at each location, then averaged the result for each sample. We found that the best fits for HPTS in an aqueous trehalose solution were obtained using a single-exponential decay function for the rotational correlation time decay. This indicates that the HPTS molecule can be modeled as a spherical rotator. The results are summarized in Table 1

Table 1. Calculated viscosity and rotational correlation times for different wt/wt% samples of aqueous trehalose.

table-icon
View This Table
. Finally, we fit rotational correlation time to the trehalose viscosity (Fig. 3) and find the linear relationship we expected from Eq. (4) for this range of viscosities.

Imaging was accomplished by utilizing our microscope in the imaging mode discussed earlier. Endosomes could clearly be identified by monitoring the intensity of HPTS emission. We selected non-endosomal areas of interest within each cell, then zoomed in on those specific areas and parked on those regions. We shifted our microscope to the fluorescence anisotropy configuration and measured the fluorescence anisotropy in the selected regions and then collected high-resolution anisotropy data in this region. Because we are no longer scanning when we collect the data, the sample volume of the measurement is determined by the diffraction limit of our microscope. We then determined the rotational correlation time at each location, using the Einstein-Stokes equation to determine the local viscosity at the measured points.

Fitting the results in Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Calibration curve: trehalose rotational correlation times – viscosity
to a linear model, we find that the slope of the line (our value for V/RT) is 0.186 +/− 0.0.0049 ns/cP, with a y-intercept of 0.00219 ns. The r-squared value is 99.65%. Since we need to find the viscosity from the rotational correlation time, we divide the measured value of the rotational correlation time by this amount to obtain the viscosity.

A fluorescence image of a live J774 microphage is shown in Fig. 6
Fig. 6 Mouse J774 cell image showing viscosity measurements at specific sites.
. As expected the viscosities at different locations within the cell were not uniform. In the cell imaged in Fig. 6, the measured viscosities range from 1.00 +/− 0.03 cP, which is close to the viscosity of water, up to 2.21+/− 0.05 cP in other areas. We found that single exponential decay functions gave the best fits for fluorescent anisotropy in the regions we examined. This indicates that in those regions cytoplasmic structures are not binding on or otherwise influencing the rotation of the fluorophore. A full study of intracellular viscosity of cells with different concentrations of trehalose is currently underway and will be reported later.

4. Conclusions

We have demonstrated a well-calibrated method for measuring the viscosity of cells at different locations within the cell by using fluorescence anisotropy measurements, using a low-cost laser, and a home-built stage. We have provided a detailed qualitative and quantitative description of our methods and algorithms that result in high resolution measurements of TDFA for the determination of intracellular viscosity with submicron spatial resolution. The cell samples were placed on the stage of a home-built confocal laser-scanning microscope, imaged, particular locations within the cell were identified, and fluorescence anisotropy measurements were made. The viscosity for each location was determined from the Stokes-Einstein equation, using the molar volume of the HPTS molecule which was measured by the use of a calibration curve relating rotational correlation time to predicted viscosity for specific weight-weight percent solutions of trehalose over a range for which the Stokes-Einstein equation was valid.

Our results indicate that fluorescence anisotropy measurements are a practical technique for the measurement of micro- and nano-viscosities within cells. This technique, combined with automation of the data collection and data analysis phase, will allow us to present high spatial resolution maps of the internal viscosities of the cell, providing another important tool in the analysis of intracellular processes.

Our measured values of intracellular viscosity under our conditions varied from 1.0 cP to 2.2 cP. This range is fairly narrow relative to some other reported studies. We believe that our intracellular environment remains very water-like under our conditions. Further, the fact that we are measuring molecular rotations makes our measurements sensitive to localized environments. Utilization of mechanical methods such as magnetic beads and extracellular probes are much larger and the inhomogeneity of cellular constituents can lead to much larger apparent viscosities. For example, intracellular features could constrict the movement of the larger beads thus leading to a very large apparent viscosity while the medium is still very water-like. Hence, this method also has the advantage of measuring viscosity on a localized (molecular) level.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge financial support from the Department of Defense and The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill via the project entitled “Collaborative Initiative in Biomedical Imaging to Study Complex Diseases”. We would also like to thank Dr. Ana Jofre of the Department of Physics and Optical Science at The University of North Carolina at Charlotte for help with the lifetime deconvolution algorithms.

References and links

1.

N. Chakraborty, W. Parker, K. Elliott, S. Smith, P. Moyer, and G. Elliott, “Molecular mobility in trehalose loaded mammalian cells: time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy measurements,” in Proceedings of the ASME 2008 Summer Bioengineering Conference 2008)

2.

N. Chakraborty, D. Biswas, W. Parker, P. Moyer, and G. D. Elliott, “A role for microwave processing in the dry preservation of mammalian cells,” Biotechnol. Bioeng. 100(4), 782–796 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3.

J. P. Acker, X. M. Lu, V. Young, S. Cheley, H. Bayley, A. Fowler, and M. Toner, “Measurement of trehalose loading of mammalian cells porated with a metal-actuated switchable pore,” Biotechnol. Bioeng. 82(5), 525–532 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4.

G. D. Elliott, X. H. Liu, J. L. Cusick, M. Menze, J. Vincent, T. Witt, S. Hand, and M. Toner, “Trehalose uptake through P2X7 purinergic channels provides dehydration protection,” Cryobiology 52(1), 114–127 (2006). [CrossRef]

5.

A. Eroglu, G. Elliott, D. L. Wright, M. Toner, and T. L. Toth, “Progressive elimination of microinjected trehalose during mouse embryonic development,” Reprod. Biomed. Online 10(4), 503–510 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6.

D. Weihs, T. G. Mason, and M. A. Teitell, “Bio-microrheology: a frontier in microrheology,” Biophys. J. 91(11), 4296–4305 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7.

F. H. C. Crick and A. F. W. Hughes, “The physical properties of cytoplasm: A study by means of the magnetic particle method Part I. Experimental,” Exp. Cell Res. 1(1), 37–80 (1950). [CrossRef]

8.

K. Yagi, “The mechanical and colloidal properties of Amoeba protoplasm and their relations to the mechanism of amoeboid movement,” Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 3(2), 73–91 (1961). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9.

Y. Hiramoto, “Mechanical properties of the protoplasm of the sea urchin egg. I. Unfertilized egg,” Exp. Cell Res. 56(2-3), 201–208 (1969). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

10.

M. Sato, T. Z. Wong, and R. D. Allen, “Rheological properties of living cytoplasm: endoplasm of Physarum plasmodium,” J. Cell Biol. 97(4), 1089–1097 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

11.

M. Sato, T. Z. Wong, D. T. Brown, and R. D. Allen, “Rheological properties of living cytoplasm - A preliminary investigation of squid axoplasm (Loligo Pealei),” Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 4(1), 7–23 (1984). [CrossRef]

12.

B. Wandelt, P. Cywinski, G. D. Darling, and B. R. Stranix, “Single cell measurement of micro-viscosity by ratio imaging of fluorescence of styrylpyridinium probe,” Biosens. Bioelectron. 20(9), 1728–1736 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13.

B. Wandelt, A. Mielniczak, P. Turkewitsch, G. D. Darling, and B. R. Stranix, “Substituted 4-[4-(dimethylamino)styryl]pyridinium salt as a fluorescent probe for cell microviscosity,” Biosens. Bioelectron. 18(4), 465–471 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14.

E. L. Elson and D. Magde, “Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. I. Conceptual basis and theory,” Biopolymers 13(1), 1–27 (1974). [CrossRef]

15.

D. Magde, E. L. Elson, and W. W. Webb, “Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. II. An experimental realization,” Biopolymers 13(1), 29–61 (1974). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16.

O. Krichevsky and G. Bonnet, “Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy: the technique and its applications,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 65(2), 251–297 (2002). [CrossRef]

17.

D. Magde, W. W. Webb, and E. Elson, “Thermodynamic Fluctuations in a Reacting System - Measurement by Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 705-& (1972).

18.

S. R. Aragon and R. Pecora, “Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy as a Probe of Molecular-Dynamics,” J. Chem. Phys. 64(4), 1791–1803 (1976). [CrossRef]

19.

D. Magde, W. W. Webb, and E. L. Elson, “Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy 3. Uniform Translation and Laminar-Flow,” Biopolymers 17(2), 361–376 (1978). [CrossRef]

20.

M. Gösch and R. Rigler, “Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy of molecular motions and kinetics,” Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 57(1), 169–190 (2005). [CrossRef]

21.

K. Fushimi and A. S. Verkman, “Low viscosity in the aqueous domain of cell cytoplasm measured by picosecond polarization microfluorimetry,” J. Cell Biol. 112(4), 719–725 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

22.

J. A. Dix and A. S. Verkman, “Mapping of fluorescence anisotropy in living cells by ratio imaging. Application to cytoplasmic viscosity,” Biophys. J. 57(2), 231–240 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

23.

J. Siegel, K. Suhling, S. Leveque-Fort, S. E. D. Webb, D. M. Davis, D. Phillips, Y. Sabharwal, and P. M. W. French, “Wide-field time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy imaging (TR-FAIM): Imaging the rotational mobility of a fluorophore,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74(1), 182–192 (2003). [CrossRef]

24.

K. Suhling, J. Siegel, P. M. P. Lanigan, S. Lévêque-Fort, S. E. D. Webb, D. Phillips, D. M. Davis, and P. M. W. French, “Time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy imaging applied to live cells,” Opt. Lett. 29(6), 584–586 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

25.

J. A. Levitt, M. K. Kuimova, G. Yahioglu, P. H. Chung, K. Suhling, and D. Phillips, “Membrane-Bound Molecular Rotors Measure Viscosity in Live Cells via Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging,” J. Phys. Chem. C 113(27), 11634–11642 (2009). [CrossRef]

26.

J. R. Lakowicz, Principles of fluorescence spectroscopy, 3rd ed. (Springer, New York, 2006), pp. xxvi, 954 p.

27.

F. L. Lin, K. E. Elliott, W. Parker, N. Chakraborty, C. S. Teo, S. T. Smith, G. D. Elliott, and P. J. Moyer, “Confocal and force probe imaging system for simultaneous three-dimensional optical and mechanical spectroscopic evaluation of biological samples,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 80(055110), 7 (2009). [CrossRef]

28.

M. Rampp, C. Buttersack, and H. D. Lüdemann, “c,T-dependence of the viscosity and the self-diffusion coefficients in some aqueous carbohydrate solutions,” Carbohydr. Res. 328(4), 561–572 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

29.

D. P. Miller, P. B. Conrad, S. Fucito, H. R. Corti, and J. J. de Pablo, “Electrical conductivity of supercooled aqueous mixtures of trehalose with sodium chloride,” J. Phys. Chem. B 104(44), 10419–10425 (2000). [CrossRef]

30.

D. P. Miller, J. J. de Pablo, and H. R. Corti, “Viscosity and glass transition temperature of aqueous mixtures of trehalose with borax and sodium chloride,” J. Phys. Chem. B 103(46), 10243–10249 (1999). [CrossRef]

31.

D. P. Miller, J. J. de Pablo, and H. Corti, “Thermophysical properties of trehalose and its concentrated aqueous solutions,” Pharm. Res. 14(5), 578–590 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

32.

S. Magazu, G. Maisano, P. Migliardo, and V. Villari, “Experimental simulation of macromolecules in trehalose aqueous solutions: A photon correlation spectroscopy study,” J. Chem. Phys. 111(19), 9086–9092 (1999). [CrossRef]

33.

J. Génotelle, “Expression de la viscosité des solutions sucrées,” Industries Alimentaires et Agricoles 95, 747–755 (1978).

34.

M. P. Longinotti and H. R. Corti, “Viscosity of concentrated sucrose and trehalose aqueous solutions including the supercooled regime,” J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 37(3), 1503–1515 (2008). [CrossRef]

35.

A. J. Cross and G. R. Fleming, “Analysis of time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy decays,” Biophys. J. 46(1), 45–56 (1984). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

36.

M. Crutzen, M. Ameloot, N. Boens, R. M. Negri, and F. C. Deschryver, “Global Analysis of Unmatched Polarized Fluorescence Decay Curves,” J. Phys. Chem. 97(31), 8133–8145 (1993). [CrossRef]

37.

S. R. Flom and J. H. Fendler, “Global Analysis of Fluorescence Depolarization Experiments,” J. Phys. Chem. 92(21), 5908–5913 (1988). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(170.1790) Medical optics and biotechnology : Confocal microscopy
(170.6280) Medical optics and biotechnology : Spectroscopy, fluorescence and luminescence
(180.2520) Microscopy : Fluorescence microscopy
(300.6500) Spectroscopy : Spectroscopy, time-resolved

ToC Category:
Medical Optics and Biotechnology

History
Original Manuscript: December 7, 2009
Revised Manuscript: June 17, 2010
Manuscript Accepted: June 17, 2010
Published: July 23, 2010

Virtual Issues
Vol. 5, Iss. 12 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Wesley C. Parker, Nilay Chakraborty, Regina Vrikkis, Gloria Elliott, Stuart Smith, and Patrick J. Moyer, "High-resolution intracellular viscosity measurement using time-dependent fluorescence anisotropy," Opt. Express 18, 16607-16617 (2010)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/vjbo/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-18-16-16607


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. N. Chakraborty, W. Parker, K. Elliott, S. Smith, P. Moyer, and G. Elliott, “Molecular mobility in trehalose loaded mammalian cells: time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy measurements,” in Proceedings of the ASME 2008 Summer Bioengineering Conference 2008)
  2. N. Chakraborty, D. Biswas, W. Parker, P. Moyer, and G. D. Elliott, “A role for microwave processing in the dry preservation of mammalian cells,” Biotechnol. Bioeng. 100(4), 782–796 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. J. P. Acker, X. M. Lu, V. Young, S. Cheley, H. Bayley, A. Fowler, and M. Toner, “Measurement of trehalose loading of mammalian cells porated with a metal-actuated switchable pore,” Biotechnol. Bioeng. 82(5), 525–532 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. G. D. Elliott, X. H. Liu, J. L. Cusick, M. Menze, J. Vincent, T. Witt, S. Hand, and M. Toner, “Trehalose uptake through P2X7 purinergic channels provides dehydration protection,” Cryobiology 52(1), 114–127 (2006). [CrossRef]
  5. A. Eroglu, G. Elliott, D. L. Wright, M. Toner, and T. L. Toth, “Progressive elimination of microinjected trehalose during mouse embryonic development,” Reprod. Biomed. Online 10(4), 503–510 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. D. Weihs, T. G. Mason, and M. A. Teitell, “Bio-microrheology: a frontier in microrheology,” Biophys. J. 91(11), 4296–4305 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. F. H. C. Crick and A. F. W. Hughes, “The physical properties of cytoplasm: A study by means of the magnetic particle method Part I. Experimental,” Exp. Cell Res. 1(1), 37–80 (1950). [CrossRef]
  8. K. Yagi, “The mechanical and colloidal properties of Amoeba protoplasm and their relations to the mechanism of amoeboid movement,” Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 3(2), 73–91 (1961). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Y. Hiramoto, “Mechanical properties of the protoplasm of the sea urchin egg. I. Unfertilized egg,” Exp. Cell Res. 56(2-3), 201–208 (1969). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. M. Sato, T. Z. Wong, and R. D. Allen, “Rheological properties of living cytoplasm: endoplasm of Physarum plasmodium,” J. Cell Biol. 97(4), 1089–1097 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. M. Sato, T. Z. Wong, D. T. Brown, and R. D. Allen, “Rheological properties of living cytoplasm - A preliminary investigation of squid axoplasm (Loligo Pealei),” Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 4(1), 7–23 (1984). [CrossRef]
  12. B. Wandelt, P. Cywinski, G. D. Darling, and B. R. Stranix, “Single cell measurement of micro-viscosity by ratio imaging of fluorescence of styrylpyridinium probe,” Biosens. Bioelectron. 20(9), 1728–1736 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. B. Wandelt, A. Mielniczak, P. Turkewitsch, G. D. Darling, and B. R. Stranix, “Substituted 4-[4-(dimethylamino)styryl]pyridinium salt as a fluorescent probe for cell microviscosity,” Biosens. Bioelectron. 18(4), 465–471 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. E. L. Elson and D. Magde, “Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. I. Conceptual basis and theory,” Biopolymers 13(1), 1–27 (1974). [CrossRef]
  15. D. Magde, E. L. Elson, and W. W. Webb, “Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. II. An experimental realization,” Biopolymers 13(1), 29–61 (1974). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. O. Krichevsky and G. Bonnet, “Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy: the technique and its applications,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 65(2), 251–297 (2002). [CrossRef]
  17. D. Magde, W. W. Webb, and E. Elson, “Thermodynamic Fluctuations in a Reacting System - Measurement by Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 705-& (1972).
  18. S. R. Aragon and R. Pecora, “Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy as a Probe of Molecular-Dynamics,” J. Chem. Phys. 64(4), 1791–1803 (1976). [CrossRef]
  19. D. Magde, W. W. Webb, and E. L. Elson, “Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy 3. Uniform Translation and Laminar-Flow,” Biopolymers 17(2), 361–376 (1978). [CrossRef]
  20. M. Gösch and R. Rigler, “Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy of molecular motions and kinetics,” Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 57(1), 169–190 (2005). [CrossRef]
  21. K. Fushimi and A. S. Verkman, “Low viscosity in the aqueous domain of cell cytoplasm measured by picosecond polarization microfluorimetry,” J. Cell Biol. 112(4), 719–725 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. J. A. Dix and A. S. Verkman, “Mapping of fluorescence anisotropy in living cells by ratio imaging. Application to cytoplasmic viscosity,” Biophys. J. 57(2), 231–240 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. J. Siegel, K. Suhling, S. Leveque-Fort, S. E. D. Webb, D. M. Davis, D. Phillips, Y. Sabharwal, and P. M. W. French, “Wide-field time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy imaging (TR-FAIM): Imaging the rotational mobility of a fluorophore,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74(1), 182–192 (2003). [CrossRef]
  24. K. Suhling, J. Siegel, P. M. P. Lanigan, S. Lévêque-Fort, S. E. D. Webb, D. Phillips, D. M. Davis, and P. M. W. French, “Time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy imaging applied to live cells,” Opt. Lett. 29(6), 584–586 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. J. A. Levitt, M. K. Kuimova, G. Yahioglu, P. H. Chung, K. Suhling, and D. Phillips, “Membrane-Bound Molecular Rotors Measure Viscosity in Live Cells via Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging,” J. Phys. Chem. C 113(27), 11634–11642 (2009). [CrossRef]
  26. J. R. Lakowicz, Principles of fluorescence spectroscopy, 3rd ed. (Springer, New York, 2006), pp. xxvi, 954 p.
  27. F. L. Lin, K. E. Elliott, W. Parker, N. Chakraborty, C. S. Teo, S. T. Smith, G. D. Elliott, and P. J. Moyer, “Confocal and force probe imaging system for simultaneous three-dimensional optical and mechanical spectroscopic evaluation of biological samples,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 80(055110), 7 (2009). [CrossRef]
  28. M. Rampp, C. Buttersack, and H. D. Lüdemann, “c,T-dependence of the viscosity and the self-diffusion coefficients in some aqueous carbohydrate solutions,” Carbohydr. Res. 328(4), 561–572 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. D. P. Miller, P. B. Conrad, S. Fucito, H. R. Corti, and J. J. de Pablo, “Electrical conductivity of supercooled aqueous mixtures of trehalose with sodium chloride,” J. Phys. Chem. B 104(44), 10419–10425 (2000). [CrossRef]
  30. D. P. Miller, J. J. de Pablo, and H. R. Corti, “Viscosity and glass transition temperature of aqueous mixtures of trehalose with borax and sodium chloride,” J. Phys. Chem. B 103(46), 10243–10249 (1999). [CrossRef]
  31. D. P. Miller, J. J. de Pablo, and H. Corti, “Thermophysical properties of trehalose and its concentrated aqueous solutions,” Pharm. Res. 14(5), 578–590 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. S. Magazu, G. Maisano, P. Migliardo, and V. Villari, “Experimental simulation of macromolecules in trehalose aqueous solutions: A photon correlation spectroscopy study,” J. Chem. Phys. 111(19), 9086–9092 (1999). [CrossRef]
  33. J. Génotelle, “Expression de la viscosité des solutions sucrées,” Industries Alimentaires et Agricoles 95, 747–755 (1978).
  34. M. P. Longinotti and H. R. Corti, “Viscosity of concentrated sucrose and trehalose aqueous solutions including the supercooled regime,” J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 37(3), 1503–1515 (2008). [CrossRef]
  35. A. J. Cross and G. R. Fleming, “Analysis of time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy decays,” Biophys. J. 46(1), 45–56 (1984). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. M. Crutzen, M. Ameloot, N. Boens, R. M. Negri, and F. C. Deschryver, “Global Analysis of Unmatched Polarized Fluorescence Decay Curves,” J. Phys. Chem. 97(31), 8133–8145 (1993). [CrossRef]
  37. S. R. Flom and J. H. Fendler, “Global Analysis of Fluorescence Depolarization Experiments,” J. Phys. Chem. 92(21), 5908–5913 (1988). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited