OSA's Digital Library

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

| EXPLORING THE INTERFACE OF LIGHT AND BIOMEDICINE

  • Editor: Gregory W. Faris
  • Vol. 5, Iss. 3 — Feb. 10, 2010
« Show journal navigation

Design and validation of a scanning Shack Hartmann aberrometer for measurements of the eye over a wide field of view

Xin Wei and Larry Thibos  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 18, Issue 2, pp. 1134-1143 (2010)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.001134


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (288 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Peripheral vision and off-axis aberrations not only play an important role in daily visual tasks but may also influence eye growth and refractive development. Thus it is important to measure off-axis wavefront aberrations of human eyes objectively. To achieve efficient measurement, we incorporated a double-pass scanning system with a Shack Hartmann wavefront sensor (SHWS) to develop a scanning Shack Hartmann aberrometer (SSHA). The prototype SSHA successfully measured the off-axis wavefront aberrations over +/− 15 degree visual field within 7 seconds. In two validation experiments with a wide angle model eye, it measured change in defocus aberration accurately (<0.02μm, 4mm pupil) and precisely (<0.03μm, 4mm pupil). A preliminary experiment with a human subject suggests its feasibility in clinical applications.

© 2010 OSA

1. Introduction

Peripheral vision plays an indispensible role in daily visual tasks such as driving [1

1. A. M. Cheong, D. R. Geruschat, and N. Congdon, “Traffic gap judgment in people with significant peripheral field loss,” Optom. Vis. Sci. 85(1), 26–36 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 2

2. B. Lachenmayr, “[Visual field and road traffic. How does peripheral vision function?],” Ophthalmologe 103(5), 373–381 (2006). [CrossRef]

] and locomotion [3

3. K. A. Lemmink, B. Dijkstra, and C. Visscher, “Effects of limited peripheral vision on shuttle sprint performance of soccer players,” Percept. Mot. Skills 100(1), 167–175 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Although visual acuity for spatial resolution tasks declines rapidly in the peripheral visual field, visual acuity for detecting spatial patterns and objects declines only slightly in the periphery [4

4. L. N. Thibos, F. E. Cheney, and D. J. Walsh, “Retinal limits to the detection and resolution of gratings,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4(8), 1524–1529 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 5

5. L. N. Thibos, D. J. Walsh, and F. E. Cheney, “Vision beyond the resolution limit: aliasing in the periphery,” Vision Res. 27(12), 2193–2197 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Spatial acuity for detecting peripheral patterns is optically limited since it can be enhanced by improving peripheral optical quality [6

6. Y. Z. Wang, L. N. Thibos, N. Lopez, T. Salmon, and A. Bradley, “Subjective refraction of the peripheral field using contrast detection acuity,” J. Am. Optom. Assoc. 67(10), 584–589 (1996). [PubMed]

, 7

7. Y. Z. Wang, L. N. Thibos, and A. Bradley, “Effects of refractive error on detection acuity and resolution acuity in peripheral vision,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 38(10), 2134–2143 (1997). [PubMed]

]. Moreover, clinical interest in peripheral vision has increased recently because peripheral optical aberrations (especially defocus) might be important for emmetropization and myopia development [8

8. W. Hodos and J. T. Erichsen, “Lower-field myopia in birds: an adaptation that keeps the ground in focus,” Vision Res. 30(5), 653–657 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12

12. E. L. Smith, J. Huang, L. F. Hung, T. L. Blasdel, T. L. Humbird, and K. H. Bockhorst, “Hemi-Retinal Form Deprivation: Evidence for Local Control of Eye Growth and Refractive Development in Infant Monkeys,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. (2009).

]. Taken together, these studies demonstrate the importance of peripheral optical quality of the human eye. Therefore, it is essential that methods be developed to measure peripheral optical quality (e.g. off-axis wavefront aberrations) objectively.

Wavefront sensing using the Shack Hartmann wavefront sensor (SHWS) has been widely used in the field of vision science to objectively measure the on-axis wavefront aberrations of human eyes. The SHWS was designed originally for optical metrology as a sub-system for controlling adaptive optics telescopes. In 1994, Liang [13

13. JJ. Liang*, B. Grimm, S. Goelz, and J. F. Bille, “Objective measurement of wave aberrations of the human eye with the use of a Hartmann-Shack wave-front sensor,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11(7), 1949 (1994). [CrossRef]

] incorporated the SHWS in an instrument designed to measure the aberrations of the eye. Since the eye is a closed system, a laser beam is introduced into the eye to form a retinal beacon that retro-reflects light back out of the eye to measure the aberrations on the second pass through the eye’s optical system. The double-pass apparatus that incorporates the SHWS as a sub-system is called a SH aberrometer. The typical SH aberrometer is designed to measure along the eye’s primary line of sight, and therefore is optimized for measuring central vision.

More recently, the SH aberrometer was adapted by Atchison [14

14. D. A. Atchison, D. H. Scott, and W. N. Charman, “Measuring ocular aberrations in the peripheral visual field using Hartmann-Shack aberrometry,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24(9), 2963–2973 (2007). [CrossRef]

, 15

15. D. A. Atchison, D. H. Scott, and W. N. Charman, “Hartmann-Shack technique and refraction across the horizontal visual field,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20(6), 965–973 (2003). [CrossRef]

] and Lunstrom [16

16. L. Lundström, P. Unsbo, and J. Gustafsson, “Off-axis wave front measurements for optical correction in eccentric viewing,” J. Biomed. Opt. 10(3), 034002 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] to measure off-axis wavefront aberrations associated with peripheral vision. In their studies, subjects were directed to fixate a target displaced from the aberrometer’s measurement axis. With eccentric fixation, the SH axis becomes oblique to the primary (foveal) line-of-sight (LoS) thus enabling measurements of the off-axis wavefront aberrations along a secondary LoS [14

14. D. A. Atchison, D. H. Scott, and W. N. Charman, “Measuring ocular aberrations in the peripheral visual field using Hartmann-Shack aberrometry,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24(9), 2963–2973 (2007). [CrossRef]

, 17

17. X. Wei and L. Thibos, “Modeling the eye’s optical system by ocular wavefront tomography,” Opt. Express 16(25), 20490–20502 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Obtaining a series of measurements along multiple LoS to survey a large area of the visual field requires the subject to fixate a sequence of targets. This is a time-consuming process that may inadvertently introduce measurement variability due to temporal instability of the eye [18

18. X. Cheng, N. L. Himebaugh, P. S. Kollbaum, L. N. Thibos, and A. Bradley, “Test-retest reliability of clinical Shack-Hartmann measurements,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45(1), 351–360 (2004). [CrossRef]

]. Thus there is a need for an expedient method to measure the off-axis wavefront aberrations of the eye in a more efficient manner.

To meet this need, we have combined the SH aberrometer with a scanning system to sequentially measure the off-axis wavefront aberrations across the central 30° visual field. This system is named as scanning Shack Hartmann aberrometer (SSHA). With our system, the eye fixates a single target while the entering probe beam rotates about the center of the entrance pupil to place the laser beacon in a sequence of locations in the peripheral retina. Light reflected from the eye is de-scanned by the same system for measurement by a fixed SHWS. The resulting increase of efficiency enables measurement of a significant field of view in a few seconds. The purpose of this paper is to report the design and validation of the instrument and technique.

The basic Shack-Hartmann wavefront aberrometer has been extensively validated for on-axis use [19

19. T. O. Salmon, L. N. Thibos, and A. Bradley, “Comparison of the eye's wave-front aberration measured psychophysically and with the Shack-Hartmann wave-front sensor,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15(9), 2457–2465 (1998). [CrossRef]

21

21. P. Kollbaum, M. Jansen, L. Thibos, and A. Bradley, “Validation of an off-eye contact lens Shack-Hartmann wavefront aberrometer,” Optom. Vis. Sci. 85(9), E817–E828 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Those validation studies have shown that test cases involving lower-order aberrations (e.g. defocus and prism) are sufficient to demonstrate that the instrument correctly measures wavefront slope and therefore the instrument is valid for measuring ocular wavefront aberrations in general. Validating a wide-field aberrometer introduces a more challenging problem of verifying the requirement for tight alignment of the eye to the instrument. Unlike axial aberrometry, a sequence off-axis wavefront aberration measurement is very sensitive to misalignment of the test eye. Sensitivity to misalignment is a common problem in optical testing that typically requires an indirect approach to validation. Accordingly, we report the results of two experiments using differential defocus plus an analysis of the positional stability of the data image during the scanning operation.

2. Methods

2.1 Instrument design

The schematic diagram of the apparatus is shown in Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Scanning Shack Hartmann aberrometer (SSHA) apparatus. BS1-3, beam splitters; DPS1-4, Double pass scanning lenses; L5-9, Lenses; SHWS, Shack Hartmann Wavefront sensor; Aperture A1, limiting aperture.
. To incorporate the scanning mirrors with SHWS, the lenslet plane of SHWS and the scanning axes of the X-Y mirrors are co-aligned optically onto planes conjugated with the entrance pupil (EP) of the tested eye [22

22. X. Wei, and L. N. Thibos, “Scanning Hartmann Shack wavefront sensor to measure off-axis wavefront aberrations,” US Patent Application No. 61/092,096 (Aug 2008).

]. This is done using three relay telescopes DPS1-2, DPS3-4, and L5-6. In the incoming path, the scanning axes of X-Y mirrors form a scanning center via DPS3-4. This scanning center is further conjugated with the EP center of the eye via DPS1-2. When a spatially filtered and collimated narrow NIR laser beam (850nm, 1mm in diameter) is introduced into the system via a beam splitter (BS1), the beam intersects with the scanning axes of X-Y mirrors and entrance pupil center of the eye. As the X-Y scanning mirrors rotate, the beam rotates about a pivot point lying at the center of the eye’s EP, thereby injecting the probe beam along different LoS specified in angular dimensions in object space (Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Scanning pattern of SSHA apparatus. As the scanning mirrors rotate, the mirrors direct the beam along different LoS in sequence. Each data point in the figure indicates a particular LoS in test eyes’ object space. The associated numbers represent the sequential order. It took 8 seconds for SSHA to scan the whole visual field.
). In the eye’s image space, this beam scans across the retina and forms a sequence of retinal spots when the scan pauses briefly (50 milliseconds) to acquire a wavefront measurement. These spots serve as beacons that radiate light for a second pass through the eye’s pupil. Thus, for each position of the scanning mirrors, a wavefront originating from the retinal spot is modulated by the ocular structures (e.g. lens and cornea) and emerges at EP as shown by the outgoing path in Fig. 1. As the emerging wavefront propagates back through the system, it is de-scanned by the X-Y scanning mirrors and then sampled by an array of 0.3-mm-diameter micro-lenses of focal length 9 mm in the SHWS.

The critical element for achieving the design goals specified above, in both incoming and outgoing paths, is the custom-designed, three-element, double-pass scanning-lens (DPS1-4 in Fig. 1). In the incoming direction, the relay telescope DPS3-4 conjugates the rotation axes of X & Y scanning mirrors and forms a compact scanning center for field angles up to 15° in all meridians. This scanning center is further conjugated to the EP center of the eye over the 15° field via telescope DPS 1-2 as shown in Fig. 3(a)
Fig. 3 The relay scanning pair. (a) Incoming direction, the scanning relay pair DPS 1-2 focus the incoming narrow laser beams to the center of entrance pupil (EP) from the scanning center; (b) In the outgoing direction, the DPS design minimizes and balance the instrumental aberration along different paths.
. The DPS lenses [22

22. X. Wei, and L. N. Thibos, “Scanning Hartmann Shack wavefront sensor to measure off-axis wavefront aberrations,” US Patent Application No. 61/092,096 (Aug 2008).

] were designed so that the mirrors could scan an incoming, narrow, collimated laser beam over the full 15° field yet the beam enters the eye near the EP center. Our DPS design goal was to ensure this pupil entry point was no more than 55μm from the pupil center. In the reverse direction (outgoing path in Fig. 3(b)), the off-axis wavefronts propagate through different parts of the two telescopes as the LoS changes. This could cause variation in the instrumental aberrations that would complicate the interpretation of aberration measurements. Therefore, our DPS design balanced the inherent aberrations of the individual lenses so that the telescope achieved diffraction limited performance along all paths of interest for a 6mm EP. To validate our DPS design when incorporated in the aberrometer, we used Zemax [23

23. Zemax User Guide (Zemax Development Corporation, 2006).

] to simulate the complete system including a wide angle schematic eye [24

24. I. Escudero-Sanz and R. Navarro, “Off-axis aberrations of a wide-angle schematic eye model,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16(8), 1881–1891 (1999). [CrossRef]

]. According to the simulation result, the aberrometer measures the off-axis wavefront aberrations of the model eye accurately over the designed visual field (+/− 15 deg).

In addition to hardware design, we developed a software package to process the raw data from the SHWS. As the wavefront encounters the lenslet array in SHWS, it is subdivided into many small beams, each of which forms spot image on the CCD sensor. The relative position of the spot centroid to its reference location is proportional to the local gradient of the detected wavefront by a factor of lenslet focal length [13

13. JJ. Liang*, B. Grimm, S. Goelz, and J. F. Bille, “Objective measurement of wave aberrations of the human eye with the use of a Hartmann-Shack wave-front sensor,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11(7), 1949 (1994). [CrossRef]

, 25

25. D. A. Atchison and D. H. Scott, “Monochromatic aberrations of human eyes in the horizontal visual field,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19(11), 2180–2184 (2002). [CrossRef]

]. Since the off-axis wavefronts propagate along differerent paths through the DPS telescopes as the X-Y mirrors scan across the visual field, it was necessary to acquire a series of reference images to compensate for the small aberrations associated with each LoS. By matching the centroid image sampled along a particular LoS with the corresponding reference image, the local gradients can be readily calculated. In general, these gradients are defined over an elliptical pupil because the measurement axis for oblique LoS intersects the plane of the iris aperture obliquely. Reconstructing the wavefront from measured gradients within an ellipse is non-trivial. To solve this problem, we have developed several wavefront reconstruction methods based on Zernike polynomials and Fourier series [26

26. X. Wei and L. N. Thibos, “Modal estimation of wavefront aberrations over elliptical pupils from wavefront gradients”. Optom. Vis. Sci., Submitted for publication.

]. In the present study we used the direct method and scaling method described previously [14

14. D. A. Atchison, D. H. Scott, and W. N. Charman, “Measuring ocular aberrations in the peripheral visual field using Hartmann-Shack aberrometry,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24(9), 2963–2973 (2007). [CrossRef]

, 16

16. L. Lundström, P. Unsbo, and J. Gustafsson, “Off-axis wave front measurements for optical correction in eccentric viewing,” J. Biomed. Opt. 10(3), 034002 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 25

25. D. A. Atchison and D. H. Scott, “Monochromatic aberrations of human eyes in the horizontal visual field,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19(11), 2180–2184 (2002). [CrossRef]

, 26

26. X. Wei and L. N. Thibos, “Modal estimation of wavefront aberrations over elliptical pupils from wavefront gradients”. Optom. Vis. Sci., Submitted for publication.

].

2.2 Instrument validation on a model eye

A physical wide angle model eye was used as a test case for instrument validation. The model eye consisted of a 4mm-pupil aperture (EP), a doublet lens (LAO 787 doublet from Melles Griot Inc.), and an extended plane retina. The optical axis of the model eye was aligned coincident with the measurement axis of the aberrometer in the 0° scanning position. The instrument was aligned such that the EP of the model eye was conjugate to the scanning center and to the lenslet array in the SHWS. The radiant flux at the pupil plane was 22 micro-watts. Wavefront measurements were obtained along multiple LoS over +/−15 degree 2-dimensional visual field sequentially (Fig. 2). We designed two experiments to test accuracy and precision by verifying the SSHA’s ability to detect changes in defocus. In the first experiment, a well-calibrated Badal system inserted between lenses L5 and L6 was used to add three levels of Z2 0 defocus (0.64µm, 1.28µm, and 1.92µm) to the aberrations of the model eye. In the second experiment, the retina of the model eye was axially translated (+1 mm, +5mm) from an emmetropic to a myopic state to introduce two levels of Z2 0 defocus over the whole visual field of the model eye. The measured defocus changes from the two experiments were then compared with theoretical predictions.

2.3 Instrument evaluation with human eyes

Besides validating with a wide angle model eye, we also tested a human subject since the light efficiency and scattering properties of the wide angle model eye are different from human eyes. The experimental protocol was approved by Indiana University Institutional Review Board and complied with the requirements of the Declaration of Helsinki. An emmetropic subject with healthy normal eyes was tested without cycloplegic or other pharmacological agents. An on-axis fixation target was set beyond the eye’s far point to encourage relaxation of accommodation. A dental impression was used to stabilize the subject’s head position. With the aid of the pupil camera, bulls-eye target and translation stage, the entrance pupil of the eye was aligned to the instrument. The radiant flux at the cornea was 42 micro-watts. The full sequence of 37 off-axis aberration measurements was repeated five times with realignment of eye to instrument between each measurement. To represent the wavefront deviation among the five measurements, the point-by-point wavefront difference between the individual trials and the mean wavefront over 5 trials was calculated. The root-mean-square error of such deviations (RMSDev) in Eq. (1) [30

30. F. Zhou, “Combined Corneal Lenticular Tomporapher and Aberrometer Based on Shack-Hartmann Wavefront Sensing Technology,” in School of Optometry(Indiana University, Bloomington, 2004), pp. 103 - 104. http://bert.lib.indiana.edu:2072/dissertations/fullcit/3162275

] provides a metric of the repeatability of the five measurements.
RMSDev=15i=15(1Nk=1N(Wi(xk,yk)Wmean(xk,yk))2)
(1)
where Wi is the i'th trial wavefront, Wmean is the mean wavefront over 5 trials, (xk,yk) is the k’th sampling point of the wavefront maps, and N is the total number of sampling points within the elliptical pupil.

3. Results

3.1 Instrument validation on a model eye

For the first experiment, the changes in measured wavefront defocus produced by known amounts of defocus introduced by the Badal system are shown in Fig. 4(a)
Fig. 4 Defocus measurements of SSHA along all LoS at various field angles. Horizontal axis indicates the scanning sequence of LoS; vertical axis indicates the magnitude of defocus terms (Z2 0) over 4 mm pupil. (a) Comparison of the defocus measurements (black dot) with the defocus introduced by the Badal lens (horizontal dash line) along multiple LoS. The masked LoS are those suffered from backward scattering. (b) Comparison of the defocus measurements (black dot) with the defocus introduced by retinal translation (horizontal dashed line) along multiple LoS. The masked LoS are those suffered from backward scattering.
. Strong backward scattering of light from the probe beam prevented measurements for 0° field angle and along the horizontal meridian. For the remaining 30 field positions, the mean defocus change was 0.66µm, 1.30 µm, and 1.92 µm for Badal defocus levels of 0.64µm, 1.28µm, and 1.92µm. Thus the inaccuracy for measuring change in aberrations is 0.02µm or less. Measurement precision, as specified by the standard deviations of the measured defocus change, was 0.02 µm, 0.03 µm, and 0.03 µm respectively. These precision values are larger than those reported for a commercial, non-scanning aberrometer [28

28. X. Cheng, N. L. Himebaugh, P. S. Kollbaum, L. N. Thibos, and A. Bradley, “Validation of a clinical Shack-Hartmann aberrometer,” Optom. Vis. Sci. 80(8), 587–595 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] but are of the same order of magnitude as the variability in human eye measurements taken under comparable conditions [18

18. X. Cheng, N. L. Himebaugh, P. S. Kollbaum, L. N. Thibos, and A. Bradley, “Test-retest reliability of clinical Shack-Hartmann measurements,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45(1), 351–360 (2004). [CrossRef]

].

Similarly for the second experiment, the changes in measured defocus produced by translating the model retina axially are compared with the ray-tracing prediction in Fig. 4(b). According to the prediction, translating the retina axially at +1mm and +5mm from its emmetropic position introduces approximately 0.23 µm and 0.85 µm defocus along every LoS within +/− 15 degree visual field. For both defocus levels (after excluding any LoS with scattering artifacts), the measurements are accurate to within 0.01 µm and precision is better than and 0.03 µm.

3.2 Instrument evaluation with human eyes

For each scan, it took less than 8 seconds to measure the eye’s wavefront aberrations along 37 LoS over the central 30° visual field. Due to the strong backward reflection from the system and cornea, the SSHA failed to measure the wavefront aberrations along the LoS along the horizontal visual field. The mean wavefront maps of the five measurements are shown over the actual elliptical entrance pupils (5mm major diameter) in Fig. 5
Fig. 5 The mean wavefront maps of the five SSHA measurements of a human subject (OS) over +/− 15 degree 2-dimensional visual field (5mm on-axis EP). The missing wavefront maps indicate the failure of SSHA measurements along the corresponding LoS due to strong backward reflection form the system and cornea. The number above the mean wavefront maps represents RMSDev across the five measurements.
. The repeatability was also tracked across the five measurements along every LoS. The RMSDev value computed over the elliptical pupil is annotated above the corresponding wavefront map in Fig. 5. When excluding the artifact-prone horizontal LoS, the mean RMSDev along all other LoS is 0.14 µm.

4. Discussion

The scanning aberrometer designed and implemented for this study efficiently measured the off-axis wavefront aberrations of human eyes along 37 different lines-of-sight in 8 seconds. Measurements of an induced change in focus of a model eye (Fig. 4) indicated the instrument has good precision (≤ 0.03μm, 4mm pupil) and accuracy (≤ 0.02μm, 4mm pupil). These values are equivalent to less than 0.03 diopters of defocus which is neither clinically nor functionally significant. Furthermore, in the evaluation experiment with a human eye, the mean RMSDev of the five repetitive measurements across the non-horizontal LoS is 0.14 µm. This low value suggests that SSHA is a feasible and reliable instrument to be applied in clinical research and diagnosis.

We validated our instrument using a differential-focus experimental-design because it excludes other potential sources of error such as misalignment of the test eye to the instrument. The mean and standard deviation of the differential measurements across multiple LoS can be regarded as the accuracy and precision of the aberrometer itself. Although it was convenient to evaluate the instrument using defocus, the results may be generalized to other aberration modes since wavefront slope is measured with the same accuracy and precision at every point in the pupil. Besides validating the SSHA with the defocus wavefront aberration of the model eye, we also measured the centers of the SH data images from different frames. Since the entrance pupil center of the test eye is conjugated with the rotational center of the scanning mirrors and the SH lenslet plane, the wavefronts emerging at the entrance pupil along different LoS should be sampled at the same location on the lenslet plane as the scanning mirrors (X&Y) scan. Correspondingly, the center of the SH centroid images of different frames should be fixed at the same location on the camera CCD plane. With the well-aligned model eye, we found that this center is very stable as the mirrors scan across the whole designed visual field (±15 degrees, excluding the horizontal LoS): the standard deviation of the center drift of the SH centroid images was 48 microns (horizontal) and 55 microns (vertical) on the CCD plane.

Although this report focuses mainly on the hardware implementation of a scanning aberrometer, it is worth noting that the development of off-axis wavefront reconstruction over elliptical pupil is also an important aspect of system development. These wavefront reconstruction methods have been summarized elsewhere [26

26. X. Wei and L. N. Thibos, “Modal estimation of wavefront aberrations over elliptical pupils from wavefront gradients”. Optom. Vis. Sci., Submitted for publication.

]. The choice of method for off-axis wavefront reconstruction and representation is application dependent. For example, the Fourier series based methods are generally more efficient computationally than the Zernike polynomial based methods. While for some clinical or scientific applications, the Zernike based method are preferred because the derived Zernike polynomials provide a succinct description of the system in terms that are easily understood, for other applications the best description of the data might be a model eye that reproduces the data [17

17. X. Wei and L. Thibos, “Modeling the eye’s optical system by ocular wavefront tomography,” Opt. Express 16(25), 20490–20502 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Two Zernike-based methods are used in our system. For display and reporting, we used Lundstrom’s ‘direct method’ [16

16. L. Lundström, P. Unsbo, and J. Gustafsson, “Off-axis wave front measurements for optical correction in eccentric viewing,” J. Biomed. Opt. 10(3), 034002 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 26

26. X. Wei and L. N. Thibos, “Modal estimation of wavefront aberrations over elliptical pupils from wavefront gradients”. Optom. Vis. Sci., Submitted for publication.

]. It applies classical least-squares fitting of the derivatives of Zernike circle polynomials to gradient data over a circumscribed circular pupil, the radius of which equals the major radius of the elliptical pupil. The absence of gradient data in the region between the ellipse and the circle does not defeat the least-squares method because practical systems are typically over-determined. The obtained wavefront map is preferred for purposes of interpreting a given optical path length (OPL) map as a prescription for a correcting lens. However, for purpose of data management, we found it more convenient to map points in the elliptical entrance pupil to the circular physical pupil, which stretches the OPL map anisotropically as described by Atchison [25

25. D. A. Atchison and D. H. Scott, “Monochromatic aberrations of human eyes in the horizontal visual field,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19(11), 2180–2184 (2002). [CrossRef]

, 26

26. X. Wei and L. N. Thibos, “Modal estimation of wavefront aberrations over elliptical pupils from wavefront gradients”. Optom. Vis. Sci., Submitted for publication.

]. The advantage of this stretching is that all the maps have a circular domain with the same diameter, which makes it easy to represent the wavefront with a conventional vector of Zernike aberration coefficients. In this way, data management is simplified, which is important for a system that generates a large amount of data quickly.

Our system incorporates dual scanning mirrors with a fixed SHWS to efficiently measure the off-axis wavefront aberrations of human eyes over a large field of view. In principal, other scanning system designs and sensing techniques could be used instead. For example, replacing our scanning lenses with reflective mirrors might reduce backward scattering and improve performance. Another improvement might be to incorporate other sensing techniques with larger dynamic range. Potential candidates might be laser ray tracing [33

33. R. Navarro and E. Moreno-Barriuso, “Laser ray-tracing method for optical testing,” Opt. Lett. 24(14), 951–953 (1999). [CrossRef]

], double pass measurement [34

34. A. Guirao and P. Artal, “Off-axis monochromatic aberrations estimated from double pass measurements in the human eye,” Vision Res. 39(26), 207–217 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], and Hartmann Moire wavefront sensor [35

35. X. Wei, T. Van Heugten, and L. Thibos, “Validation of a Hartmann-Moiré wavefront sensor with large dynamic range,” Opt. Express 17(16), 14180–14185 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. These techniques have the potential to grant the instrument much larger dynamic range for wavefront sensing as well as increased range of accessible visual field.

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by National Eye Institute of the National Institutes of Health. Grant No:R01-EY05109.

References and links

1.

A. M. Cheong, D. R. Geruschat, and N. Congdon, “Traffic gap judgment in people with significant peripheral field loss,” Optom. Vis. Sci. 85(1), 26–36 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2.

B. Lachenmayr, “[Visual field and road traffic. How does peripheral vision function?],” Ophthalmologe 103(5), 373–381 (2006). [CrossRef]

3.

K. A. Lemmink, B. Dijkstra, and C. Visscher, “Effects of limited peripheral vision on shuttle sprint performance of soccer players,” Percept. Mot. Skills 100(1), 167–175 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4.

L. N. Thibos, F. E. Cheney, and D. J. Walsh, “Retinal limits to the detection and resolution of gratings,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4(8), 1524–1529 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5.

L. N. Thibos, D. J. Walsh, and F. E. Cheney, “Vision beyond the resolution limit: aliasing in the periphery,” Vision Res. 27(12), 2193–2197 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6.

Y. Z. Wang, L. N. Thibos, N. Lopez, T. Salmon, and A. Bradley, “Subjective refraction of the peripheral field using contrast detection acuity,” J. Am. Optom. Assoc. 67(10), 584–589 (1996). [PubMed]

7.

Y. Z. Wang, L. N. Thibos, and A. Bradley, “Effects of refractive error on detection acuity and resolution acuity in peripheral vision,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 38(10), 2134–2143 (1997). [PubMed]

8.

W. Hodos and J. T. Erichsen, “Lower-field myopia in birds: an adaptation that keeps the ground in focus,” Vision Res. 30(5), 653–657 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9.

S. Diether and F. Schaeffel, “Local changes in eye growth induced by imposed local refractive error despite active accommodation,” Vision Res. 37(6), 659–668 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

10.

J. Wallman and J. Winawer, “Homeostasis of eye growth and the question of myopia,” Neuron 43(4), 447–468 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

11.

E. L. Smith 3rd, C. S. Kee, R. Ramamirtham, Y. Qiao-Grider, and L. F. Hung, “Peripheral vision can influence eye growth and refractive development in infant monkeys,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 46(11), 3965–3972 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12.

E. L. Smith, J. Huang, L. F. Hung, T. L. Blasdel, T. L. Humbird, and K. H. Bockhorst, “Hemi-Retinal Form Deprivation: Evidence for Local Control of Eye Growth and Refractive Development in Infant Monkeys,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. (2009).

13.

JJ. Liang*, B. Grimm, S. Goelz, and J. F. Bille, “Objective measurement of wave aberrations of the human eye with the use of a Hartmann-Shack wave-front sensor,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11(7), 1949 (1994). [CrossRef]

14.

D. A. Atchison, D. H. Scott, and W. N. Charman, “Measuring ocular aberrations in the peripheral visual field using Hartmann-Shack aberrometry,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24(9), 2963–2973 (2007). [CrossRef]

15.

D. A. Atchison, D. H. Scott, and W. N. Charman, “Hartmann-Shack technique and refraction across the horizontal visual field,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20(6), 965–973 (2003). [CrossRef]

16.

L. Lundström, P. Unsbo, and J. Gustafsson, “Off-axis wave front measurements for optical correction in eccentric viewing,” J. Biomed. Opt. 10(3), 034002 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

17.

X. Wei and L. Thibos, “Modeling the eye’s optical system by ocular wavefront tomography,” Opt. Express 16(25), 20490–20502 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

18.

X. Cheng, N. L. Himebaugh, P. S. Kollbaum, L. N. Thibos, and A. Bradley, “Test-retest reliability of clinical Shack-Hartmann measurements,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45(1), 351–360 (2004). [CrossRef]

19.

T. O. Salmon, L. N. Thibos, and A. Bradley, “Comparison of the eye's wave-front aberration measured psychophysically and with the Shack-Hartmann wave-front sensor,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15(9), 2457–2465 (1998). [CrossRef]

20.

F. Zhou, X. Hong, D. T. Miller, L. N. Thibos, and A. Bradley, “Validation of a combined corneal topographer and aberrometer based on Shack-Hartmann wave-front sensing,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 21(5), 683–696 (2004). [CrossRef]

21.

P. Kollbaum, M. Jansen, L. Thibos, and A. Bradley, “Validation of an off-eye contact lens Shack-Hartmann wavefront aberrometer,” Optom. Vis. Sci. 85(9), E817–E828 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

22.

X. Wei, and L. N. Thibos, “Scanning Hartmann Shack wavefront sensor to measure off-axis wavefront aberrations,” US Patent Application No. 61/092,096 (Aug 2008).

23.

Zemax User Guide (Zemax Development Corporation, 2006).

24.

I. Escudero-Sanz and R. Navarro, “Off-axis aberrations of a wide-angle schematic eye model,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16(8), 1881–1891 (1999). [CrossRef]

25.

D. A. Atchison and D. H. Scott, “Monochromatic aberrations of human eyes in the horizontal visual field,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19(11), 2180–2184 (2002). [CrossRef]

26.

X. Wei and L. N. Thibos, “Modal estimation of wavefront aberrations over elliptical pupils from wavefront gradients”. Optom. Vis. Sci., Submitted for publication.

27.

D. A. Atchison, A. Bradley, L. N. Thibos, and G. Smith, “Useful variations of the Badal Optometer,” Optom. Vis. Sci. 72(4), 279–284 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

28.

X. Cheng, N. L. Himebaugh, P. S. Kollbaum, L. N. Thibos, and A. Bradley, “Validation of a clinical Shack-Hartmann aberrometer,” Optom. Vis. Sci. 80(8), 587–595 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

29.

ANSI, “American National Standard for Safe Use of Lasers,” in ANSI Z136.1, A. N. S. Institute, ed. (2007).

30.

F. Zhou, “Combined Corneal Lenticular Tomporapher and Aberrometer Based on Shack-Hartmann Wavefront Sensing Technology,” in School of Optometry(Indiana University, Bloomington, 2004), pp. 103 - 104. http://bert.lib.indiana.edu:2072/dissertations/fullcit/3162275

31.

R. Montés-Micó, J. L. Alió, G. Muñoz, and W. N. Charman, “Temporal changes in optical quality of air-tear film interface at anterior cornea after blink,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45(6), 1752–1757 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

32.

R. Montés-Micó, J. L. Alió, and W. N. Charman, “Dynamic changes in the tear film in dry eyes,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 46(5), 1615–1619 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

33.

R. Navarro and E. Moreno-Barriuso, “Laser ray-tracing method for optical testing,” Opt. Lett. 24(14), 951–953 (1999). [CrossRef]

34.

A. Guirao and P. Artal, “Off-axis monochromatic aberrations estimated from double pass measurements in the human eye,” Vision Res. 39(26), 207–217 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

35.

X. Wei, T. Van Heugten, and L. Thibos, “Validation of a Hartmann-Moiré wavefront sensor with large dynamic range,” Opt. Express 17(16), 14180–14185 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

OCIS Codes
(330.0330) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision, color, and visual optics

ToC Category:
Vision, Color, and Visual Optics

History
Original Manuscript: October 26, 2009
Revised Manuscript: December 21, 2009
Manuscript Accepted: December 23, 2009
Published: January 8, 2010

Virtual Issues
Vol. 5, Iss. 3 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Xin Wei and Larry Thibos, "Design and validation of a scanning Shack Hartmann aberrometer for measurements of the eye over a wide field of view," Opt. Express 18, 1134-1143 (2010)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/vjbo/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-18-2-1134


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. A. M. Cheong, D. R. Geruschat, and N. Congdon, “Traffic gap judgment in people with significant peripheral field loss,” Optom. Vis. Sci. 85(1), 26–36 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. B. Lachenmayr, “[Visual field and road traffic. How does peripheral vision function?],” Ophthalmologe 103(5), 373–381 (2006). [CrossRef]
  3. K. A. Lemmink, B. Dijkstra, and C. Visscher, “Effects of limited peripheral vision on shuttle sprint performance of soccer players,” Percept. Mot. Skills 100(1), 167–175 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. L. N. Thibos, F. E. Cheney, and D. J. Walsh, “Retinal limits to the detection and resolution of gratings,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4(8), 1524–1529 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. L. N. Thibos, D. J. Walsh, and F. E. Cheney, “Vision beyond the resolution limit: aliasing in the periphery,” Vision Res. 27(12), 2193–2197 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Y. Z. Wang, L. N. Thibos, N. Lopez, T. Salmon, and A. Bradley, “Subjective refraction of the peripheral field using contrast detection acuity,” J. Am. Optom. Assoc. 67(10), 584–589 (1996). [PubMed]
  7. Y. Z. Wang, L. N. Thibos, and A. Bradley, “Effects of refractive error on detection acuity and resolution acuity in peripheral vision,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 38(10), 2134–2143 (1997). [PubMed]
  8. W. Hodos and J. T. Erichsen, “Lower-field myopia in birds: an adaptation that keeps the ground in focus,” Vision Res. 30(5), 653–657 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. S. Diether and F. Schaeffel, “Local changes in eye growth induced by imposed local refractive error despite active accommodation,” Vision Res. 37(6), 659–668 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. J. Wallman and J. Winawer, “Homeostasis of eye growth and the question of myopia,” Neuron 43(4), 447–468 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. E. L. Smith, C. S. Kee, R. Ramamirtham, Y. Qiao-Grider, and L. F. Hung, “Peripheral vision can influence eye growth and refractive development in infant monkeys,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 46(11), 3965–3972 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. E. L. Smith, J. Huang, L. F. Hung, T. L. Blasdel, T. L. Humbird, and K. H. Bockhorst, “Hemi-Retinal Form Deprivation: Evidence for Local Control of Eye Growth and Refractive Development in Infant Monkeys,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. (2009).
  13. JJ. Liang*, B. Grimm, S. Goelz, and J. F. Bille, “Objective measurement of wave aberrations of the human eye with the use of a Hartmann-Shack wave-front sensor,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11(7), 1949 (1994). [CrossRef]
  14. D. A. Atchison, D. H. Scott, and W. N. Charman, “Measuring ocular aberrations in the peripheral visual field using Hartmann-Shack aberrometry,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24(9), 2963–2973 (2007). [CrossRef]
  15. D. A. Atchison, D. H. Scott, and W. N. Charman, “Hartmann-Shack technique and refraction across the horizontal visual field,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20(6), 965–973 (2003). [CrossRef]
  16. L. Lundström, P. Unsbo, and J. Gustafsson, “Off-axis wave front measurements for optical correction in eccentric viewing,” J. Biomed. Opt. 10(3), 034002 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. X. Wei and L. Thibos, “Modeling the eye’s optical system by ocular wavefront tomography,” Opt. Express 16(25), 20490–20502 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. X. Cheng, N. L. Himebaugh, P. S. Kollbaum, L. N. Thibos, and A. Bradley, “Test-retest reliability of clinical Shack-Hartmann measurements,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45(1), 351–360 (2004). [CrossRef]
  19. T. O. Salmon, L. N. Thibos, and A. Bradley, “Comparison of the eye's wave-front aberration measured psychophysically and with the Shack-Hartmann wave-front sensor,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15(9), 2457–2465 (1998). [CrossRef]
  20. F. Zhou, X. Hong, D. T. Miller, L. N. Thibos, and A. Bradley, “Validation of a combined corneal topographer and aberrometer based on Shack-Hartmann wave-front sensing,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 21(5), 683–696 (2004). [CrossRef]
  21. P. Kollbaum, M. Jansen, L. Thibos, and A. Bradley, “Validation of an off-eye contact lens Shack-Hartmann wavefront aberrometer,” Optom. Vis. Sci. 85(9), E817–E828 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. X. Wei, and L. N. Thibos, “Scanning Hartmann Shack wavefront sensor to measure off-axis wavefront aberrations,” US Patent Application No. 61/092,096 (Aug 2008).
  23. Zemax User Guide (Zemax Development Corporation, 2006).
  24. I. Escudero-Sanz and R. Navarro, “Off-axis aberrations of a wide-angle schematic eye model,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16(8), 1881–1891 (1999). [CrossRef]
  25. D. A. Atchison and D. H. Scott, “Monochromatic aberrations of human eyes in the horizontal visual field,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19(11), 2180–2184 (2002). [CrossRef]
  26. X. Wei and L. N. Thibos, “Modal estimation of wavefront aberrations over elliptical pupils from wavefront gradients”. Optom. Vis. Sci., Submitted for publication.
  27. D. A. Atchison, A. Bradley, L. N. Thibos, and G. Smith, “Useful variations of the Badal Optometer,” Optom. Vis. Sci. 72(4), 279–284 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. X. Cheng, N. L. Himebaugh, P. S. Kollbaum, L. N. Thibos, and A. Bradley, “Validation of a clinical Shack-Hartmann aberrometer,” Optom. Vis. Sci. 80(8), 587–595 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. ANSI, “American National Standard for Safe Use of Lasers,” in ANSI Z136.1, A. N. S. Institute, ed. (2007).
  30. F. Zhou, “Combined Corneal Lenticular Tomporapher and Aberrometer Based on Shack-Hartmann Wavefront Sensing Technology,” in School of Optometry(Indiana University, Bloomington, 2004), pp. 103 - 104. http://bert.lib.indiana.edu:2072/dissertations/fullcit/3162275
  31. R. Montés-Micó, J. L. Alió, G. Muñoz, and W. N. Charman, “Temporal changes in optical quality of air-tear film interface at anterior cornea after blink,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45(6), 1752–1757 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. R. Montés-Micó, J. L. Alió, and W. N. Charman, “Dynamic changes in the tear film in dry eyes,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 46(5), 1615–1619 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. R. Navarro and E. Moreno-Barriuso, “Laser ray-tracing method for optical testing,” Opt. Lett. 24(14), 951–953 (1999). [CrossRef]
  34. A. Guirao and P. Artal, “Off-axis monochromatic aberrations estimated from double pass measurements in the human eye,” Vision Res. 39(26), 207–217 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. X. Wei, T. Van Heugten, and L. Thibos, “Validation of a Hartmann-Moiré wavefront sensor with large dynamic range,” Opt. Express 17(16), 14180–14185 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4 Fig. 5
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited