OSA's Digital Library

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

| EXPLORING THE INTERFACE OF LIGHT AND BIOMEDICINE

  • Editor: Gregory W. Faris
  • Vol. 5, Iss. 6 — Apr. 8, 2010
« Show journal navigation

Imaging outer segment renewal in living human cone photoreceptors

Ravi S. Jonnal, Jason R. Besecker, Jack C. Derby, Omer P. Kocaoglu, Barry Cense, Weihua Gao, Qiang Wang, and Donald T. Miller  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 18, Issue 5, pp. 5257-5270 (2010)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.005257


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1028 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

In vertebrate eyes, vision begins when the photoreceptor’s outer segment absorbs photons and generates a neural signal destined for the brain. The extreme optical and metabolic demands of this process of phototransduction necessitate continual renewal of the outer segment. Outer segment renewal has been long studied in post-mortem rods using autoradiography, but has been observed neither in living photoreceptors nor directly in cones. Using adaptive optics, which permits the resolution of cones, and temporally coherent illumination, which transforms the outer segment into a “biological interferometer,” we observed cone renewal in three subjects, manifesting as elongation of the cone outer segment, with rates ranging from 93 to 113 nm/hour (2.2 to 2.7 µm/day). In one subject we observed renewal occurring over 24 hours, with small but significant changes in renewal rate over the day. We determined that this novel method is sensitive to changes in outer segment length of 139 nm, more than 20 times better than the axial resolution of ultra-high resolution optical coherence tomography, the best existing method for depth imaging of the living retina.

© 2010 OSA

1. Introduction

The outer segment (OS) of the vertebrate photoreceptor is composed of a stack of phospholipid membrane discs studded with opsins, the proteins that capture photons and initiate phototransduction—the origin of vision. Throughout the day, the photoreceptor adds new discs to the proximal end of its OS. At the distal end, dozens of discs are removed periodically by cells in the underlying retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), whose microvilli ensheath the OS. These complementary processes—disc renewal and disc shedding—are thought to offset the extreme optical [1

1. W. K. Noell, V. S. Walker, B. O. K. S. Kang, and S. Berman, “Retinal damage by light in rats,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 5, 450–473 (1966).

,2

2. D. T. Organisciak and B. S. Winkler, “Retinal light damage: practical and theoretical considerations,” Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 13(1), 1–29 (1994). [CrossRef]

] and metabolic [3

3. F. J. M. Daemen, “Vertebrate rod outer segment membranes,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta 300(3), 255–288 (1973). [PubMed]

5

5. B. Anderson Jr., “Ocular effects of changes in oxygen and carbon dioxide tension,” Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc. 66, 423–474 (1968). [PubMed]

] demands placed on photoreceptors, and have been studied extensively in post-mortem tissue samples, using autoradiographic and histological techniques since their discovery in the late 1960s [6

6. R. W. Young, “The renewal of photoreceptor cell outer segments,” J. Cell Biol. 33(1), 61–72 (1967). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,7

7. R. W. Young and D. Bok, “Participation of the retinal pigment epithelium in the rod outer segment renewal process,” J. Cell Biol. 42(2), 392–403 (1969). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. In rod photoreceptors, the rate of renewal is determined by radiolabeling the discs, sacrificing animals at fixed intervals, and determining the locations of radiolabel in the OS [6

6. R. W. Young, “The renewal of photoreceptor cell outer segments,” J. Cell Biol. 33(1), 61–72 (1967). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,8

8. M. M. LaVail, “Rod outer segment disk shedding in rat retina: relationship to cyclic lighting,” Science 194(4269), 1071–1074 (1976). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Autoradiography does not allow renewal to be observed in cones because the continuity of their disc membranes causes rapid diffusion of radiolabel throughout the OS [9

9. D. Bok, “Retinal photoreceptor-pigment epithelium interactions. Friedenwald lecture,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 26(12), 1659–1694 (1985). [PubMed]

]. However, cone disc shedding has been quantified by dissecting the eye and measuring the size of disc-filled phagosomes in the RPE [10

10. R. H. Steinberg, I. Wood, and R. H. Steinberg, “Phagocytosis by pigment epithelium of human retinal cones,” Nature 252(5481), 305–307 (1974). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,11

11. D. H. Anderson and S. K. Fisher, “Disc shedding in rodlike and conelike photoreceptors of tree squirrels,” Science 187(4180), 953–955 (1975). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

Our proposed method of in vivo detection of disc renewal depends on a simple optical model of light propagation through the cone OS [12

12. R. S. Jonnal, J. Rha, Y. Zhang, B. Cense, W. Gao, and D. T. Miller, “In vivo functional imaging of human cone photoreceptors,” Opt. Express 15(24), 16141–16160 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. It is known from studies using adaptive optics optical coherence tomography (AO-OCT) [13

13. Y. Zhang, B. Cense, J. Rha, R. S. Jonnal, W. Gao, R. J. Zawadzki, J. S. Werner, S. Jones, S. Olivier, and D. T. Miller, “High-speed volumetric imaging of cone photoreceptors with adaptive optics spectral-domain optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express 14(10), 4380–4394 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] and other non-invasive imaging modalities [14

14. W. Gao, B. Cense, Y. Zhang, R. S. Jonnal, D. T. Miller, and D. T. Miller, “Measuring retinal contributions to the optical Stiles-Crawford effect with optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express 16(9), 6486–6501 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,15

15. A. Pallikaris, D. R. Williams, and H. Hofer, “The reflectance of single cones in the living human eye,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 44(10), 4580–4592 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] that the bulk of the reflected light exiting an individual cone photoreceptor originates from the two ends of the OS, the connecting cilium (CC) and the posterior tip (PT). This is evident in the representative AO-OCT retinal cross-section shown in Fig. 1(b)
Fig. 1 The reflective structure of the retina. (a) A diagram depicting the major layers of the neural retina, consisting of the inner limiting membrane (ILM), nerve fiber layer (NFL), ganglion cell layer (GCL), inner plexiform layer (IPL), inner nuclear layer (INL), outer plexiform layer (OPL), outer nuclear layer (ONL), external limiting membrane (ELM), the inner segments (IS) and outer segments (OS) (which make up the photoreceptor layer), the connecting cilia (CC) and posterior tip (PT) layers (which bound the outer segment), the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), and the choroid (CH). (b) An AO-OCT B-scan (log intensity) from Subject 1, showing a cross-section of the full retinal thickness, aligned with the layers depicted in (a), and an enlarged view (linear intensity) of the cone outer segments. While OCT images are typically shown in log intensity, the linear intensity view of the outer segments demonstrates vividly that the bulk of the cone reflection originates at the CC and PT layers: the bright, patterned reflections at the CC and PT layers are the most visible structures in the linear intensity image; their peak intensity is more than two orders of magnitude greater than the average intensity of all other layers in the image. Each distinct reflection in the pattern represents a single cone cell. (c) A model of light propagation through the OS. Two bright reflections (Ψ1and Ψ2) originate from the CC and PT layers, creating a biological interferometer in the retina that is sensitive to small (<<λ) changes in the outer segment length L whenever the temporal coherence length of the illumination source Lc is longer than L.
. The two lines of regularly spaced bright reflections occur at the CC and PT layers, with each bright reflection corresponding to an individual cone cell. This observation supports a two-surface model describing light propagation through the OS [Fig. 1(c)] and the subsequent reflectance of the cone. Based on this model, the cone reflectance I can be predicted by the well known interference equation of two wavefronts: the sum of a DC component I0 representing non-interfering reflections and a cosine component representing interference of the two surface reflections. Mathematically, this is expressed as
I=I0+2|Ψ1||Ψ2|cos(2πλ2nL)
(1)
where Ψ1 and Ψ2 are the bright reflections from CC and PT, and L and n are the OS’s length and refractive index, and λ is the imaging wavelength. Throughout the paper we assume n=1.43, following [16

16. W. Snyder and C. Pask, “Stiles-crawford effect-explanation and consequences,” Vision Res. 13(6), 1115–1137 (1973). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The optical delay between Ψ1 and Ψ2 is given by 2nL, since the light reflecting from PT makes a round trip before it interferes with light reflecting from CC. An underlying assumption of the equation is that the temporal coherence length of illumination Lc, i.e., the distance over which light will interfere with itself, must be longer than L. We term this condition—where Ψ1and Ψ2interfere—“long coherence”. When Lc is smaller than L, Ψ1and Ψ2 do not interfere and the cosine term vanishes. We term this condition “short coherence”.

Importantly, Eq. (1) relates the cone reflectance I to the length of the cone’s OS, L. Specifically, it predicts that linear changes in OS length lead to sinusoidal oscillations in reflectance and that random miniscule, <λ/(2n), differences among the OS length of different cones cause random variations in the initial phase of these oscillations.

In accord with the model presented in Eq. (1) and Fig. 1, we predict that cones, when imaged with a long coherence source, will exhibit sinusoidal reflectance oscillations caused by the elongation of the outer segment that accompanies daily renewal, and that the phase of these oscillations will vary randomly from cone to cone. We predict that these oscillations will not appear when the cones are imaged with a short coherence source.

2. Methods

To test the predictions above, we imaged the cone mosaics of three human subjects using a research-grade camera equipped with adaptive optics, and both long- and short-coherence, near infrared illumination sources. The Indiana University Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects approved all experimental protocols.

2.1 Adaptive optics retina camera

We designed a research-grade camera for measuring disc renewal, consisting of two main subsystems: an adaptive optics (AO) system for measuring and correcting ocular aberrations, and an imaging system for collecting images of the subject’s retina. A schematic diagram of the system is shown in Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Schematic diagram of the adaptive optics (AO) retina camera. Abbreviations used: superluminescent diode (SLD), laser diode (LD), multimode fiber (MMF), mirror (M), dichroic beam splitter (DBS), pellicle beam splitter (PBS), and charge-coupled device (CCD). The AO system consists of the 788 nm SLD, the Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor, and the deformable mirror. The imaging system consists of the 810 nm LD, the 842 nm SLD, and the science CCD.
.

The imaging arm of the system consisted principally of two light sources for illuminating the subject’s retina and a high-speed, high-sensitivity electronic camera. The “long coherence” source consisted of two near-infrared laser diodes (combined output:λ=810nm; Δλ=3nm; Lc=68μm in OS, combined output; EM4, Inc.) with a maximum power of 3.0 W each, combined using a custom multimode fiber combiner coupled to 200 m of multimode fiber that scrambled the light, reducing its spatial coherence. The “short coherence” source consisted of a near-infrared SLD (λ=842nm; Δλ=22nm; Lc=10μm in OS; Superlum, Inc.) with a maximum power of 150 mW. The SLD was coupled to 25 m of multimode fiber. We connected the multimode fibers, one at a time, to a 2 m, 600 μm core multimode patch fiber. The tip of this patch fiber was magnified and imaged onto the retina for illuminating a 1.7 deg (510 µm) region. The powers of the sources were 2.0 mW and 1.8 mW, respectively, at the cornea. Both incident powers were more than a factor of ten below the ANSI limit for the 1.2 s exposures used in these experiments.

Coherence lengths of the light sources, in the outer segment, were computed using Lc=2(ln2)λ2/(nπΔλ), where λ and Δλ were provided by the source manufacturer. The illuminated retinal patch was imaged through the system onto a back-illuminated CCD (Sarnoff, Inc., CAM1M100-SFT), which operated in trigger mode and acquired images at a rate of 192 Hz.

The desired retinal location was positioned in the beam path by instructing the subject to gaze at specified points on a calibrated fixation target. The target was placed upstream of the eye and at a plane conjugate to the retina.

2.2 Image acquisition

Dental impression bite bars were fabricated for each subject. The bite bars were attached to an XYZ translation stage that allowed accurate alignment of the subject’s eye to the optical axis of the retina camera. Subjects were given hourly drops of Tropicamide 1% for dilatation and cylcoplegia, over the course of the imaging sessions. For periods of 5 or 24 hours, images were collected and time stamped at fifteen minute (+/− 1.5 minutes) intervals. For each 5 or 24 hour experiment, the subject fixated at the same location (1.8 deg from the foveal center—superior-temporal, superior-nasal, and superior-temporal, for subjects 1, 2, and 3, respectively). This retinal eccentricity was chosen as a compromise between the foveal center, where the cones are numerous but near the resolution limit of the system, and the parafovea, where cones are easily resolvable, but cone density is reduced tenfold and cones are often obscured by vasculature. The AO system was monitored until residual wavefront error fell below a selected threshold. At that time, the subject was asked to temporarily refrain from blinking. A pulse/delay generator (Berkeley Nucleonics Corporation) simultaneously triggered a mechanical shutter (Vincent, Assoc.; Uniblitz) in the illumination channel to open for 1.2 s, and a waveform generator (Agilent, Inc.) to send a train of 200 square 5 ms TTL pulses (192 Hz) to the external trigger input of the imaging CCD. This resulted in the acquisition of 200 retinal images in 1.04 s.

2.3 Experiment protocol

In three subjects, we illuminated a 1.7 degree patch of retina, located 1.8 degrees from the foveal center, with the long coherence laser diode and collected images every 15 minutes over five hour intervals in the afternoon or evening. To determine if oscillations are present throughout the day, and to explore variations in oscillation frequency over the course of the day, we imaged one subject every 15 minutes over 24 hours (noon – noon). To test the effect of source coherence we switched to the short coherence SLD of similar wavelength, and imaged one subject every 15 minutes over five hours. Table 1

Table 1. Summary of experimental trials and average renewal velocities measured (see text for details).

table-icon
View This Table
summarizes the six trials.

2.4 Image processing and analysis

All software for image processing and analysis was developed in MATLAB® (Mathworks, Inc.) and Python/NumPy/SciPy. To correct for unwanted etaloning (an artifactual effect caused by the interference of reflections inside the thin silicon substrate of the Sarnoff CCD), images were flat-fielded. To correct for image-wide variations in retinal reflectance, such as those due to variations in source power, pupil size, or AO correction, each pixel’s intensity was divided by the image’s mean pixel intensity.

We quantified the oscillations in terms of their contrast, frequency, variation in frequency, and phase. To start, we determined the locations of all cones and assessed cone reflectance as the mean pixel value over a circular region of the image whose radius was chosen based on the observed spacing between cones in the image, which agreed closely with spacing values reported in the literature [19

19. C. A. Curcio, K. R. Sloan, R. E. Kalina, and A. E. Hendrickson, “Human photoreceptor topography,” J. Comp. Neurol. 292(4), 497–523 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

Next, to analyze all the cones in each trial, we computed mean power spectra. We computed the power spectrum of each cone reflectance series by subtracting the mean reflectance from the series (resulting in a zero-mean reflectance series), padding with zeros to generate a vector of 1024 points, computing the Fourier Transform of the vector, and then squaring the resulting magnitude. The power spectra from all cones were averaged to generate the mean power spectrum.

We fit a four-parameter cosine expression,F=A+Bcos(2πC+D), analytically, to the cone reflectance series. We computed the fit F by setting A to the mean cone reflectance, B to 2σr (where σr was the standard deviation of the measured reflectance series), C to the peak frequency in the power spectrum, and D to the phase component of the Fourier transform at the peak temporal frequency. As the fitting was performed analytically, no optimization or error minimization procedures were necessary. The cosine fits were used to estimate the system’s sensitivity to changes in OS length, as follows. The cosine fit of each reflectance series was subtracted from the measured reflectance to give a residual error ϵ, with standard deviation σϵ. The amplitude of the measured oscillation was estimated using 2σr, as above. Thus the minimal detectable reflectance change is R0=σϵ/(2σr). Considering that the full amplitude of oscillation occurs when the outer segment’s length changes by λ/2, and the round trip effects of OS length and refractive index, the smallest detectable length change is estimated by R0λ/(4n).

In order to measure changes in oscillation rate over the course of the day, we computed variations in frequency over the 24-hour data set. This was realized by multiplying the 24-hour reflectance series of each cone by Gaussian windows (σ=1hr) centered about each hour from 2pm (two hours after the experiment began) to 10 am (two hours before the experiment’s end). The power spectrum of each windowed reflectance series was computed, and the peak frequency located. We averaged the peak frequencies of all cones, at each time, and computed the standard error of the mean. These values resulted in the data points and error bars plotted in Fig. 6
Fig. 6 Plot of the average frequency of oscillation over 24 hour period. Each data point was generated by computing the power spectrum of every cone reflectance series over a four hour window, locating the peak in each power spectrum, and averaging those peak frequencies together. The data point at 2pm, for instance, is the average frequency between the hours of noon and 4pm. Standard deviation (σ) of peak frequencies was computed. Error bars show one standard error of the mean in the distribution of frequencies, (σ/√N, with N = 806). Oscillations in reflectance were present throughout the 24 hour experiment.
. No additional statistical tests were employed.

3. Results

3.1 Cone reflectance oscillates with a period of 2.5 to 3 hours

Images acquired during the five hour experiments showed clear oscillations in reflectivity of individual cones. A representative example is given in Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Visible oscillations in cone reflectance over hours. (a) Cone mosaic image acquired from subject 1 with the AO retina camera. The image, an average of 21 images acquired over five hours, is 324x264 μm and each bright spot is a single cone cell. (b-f) Enlarged images of a sample region (location indicated by white box in (a)), acquired at 0h, 0.75h, 1.5h, 2.25h, and 3h. Most of the cones can be observed to go through approximately one full cycle of reflectance change. For example, cone 1 is bright at times 0h and 3h, but dark at time 1.5h, while cone 5 is dark at times 0h and 3h, but bright at time 1.5h.
, showing cone images at 0.75 hr intervals for one subject. A corresponding time-lapsed video of all the images of the cone mosaic over five hours is given in Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Video showing the visible oscillations in cone reflectance over five hours (Media 1). The clock in the upper right shows the time each image in the video was acquired. In order to emphasize oscillations at the peak frequency while reducing the visible effects of noise near the sampling frequency, a Gaussian temporal lowpass filter (σ = 12 min) was used. Most cones appear to go through nearly two full cycles of reflectance oscillation. The amplitude and phase of oscillation appear to vary randomly among cones.
(Media 1). Similar oscillations in reflectivity were observed in all trials on all subjects when we used the long coherence source. The period of oscillations ranged from 2.5 to 3 hours.

Oscillations in reflectance are clearly visible in Fig. 5(a)
Fig. 5 Cone reflectances and their power spectra (plots offset vertically for ease of viewing). (a) Reflectance as a function of time of eight sample cones taken from trial 4. Superimposed on each plot is a cosine fit (gray line). The black bar in the upper left shows 1/10th of the average DC component, I0, of cone reflectance. The oscillation of reflectance in all cones had a visible period of 2.5 – 3 hours, while the amplitudes and phases appeared to vary randomly. At the bottom is a plot of the average reflectance of all cones (diamonds), nearly flat (contrast 0.18%), which is predicted by the model shown in Fig. 1(c) and Eq. (1). (b) Power spectra of mean-subtracted cone reflectance traces shown in a, and the average spectrum of all 1626 cones (dark line). Most cones in this trial had a visible peak in the power spectrum around 0.37 cyc/hr, and this peak is visible in the average power spectrum as well. Similar peaks were seen in power spectra of individual cones, and the average power spectrum, in all trials in which the long coherence source was used (these frequencies are summarized in Table 1). When the short coherence source was used, neither the power spectra of individual cones nor the average power spectrum showed comparable peaks.
, which shows temporal changes in reflectance of eight sample cones from trial 4. The 2.5 to 3 hour sinusoidal periodicity is evident, as are differences in phase. Shown at the bottom Fig. 5(a) is the average reflectance of all 1626 cones from the trial (diamonds). No oscillations are visible in this average. The washout of oscillations in the average confirms that the oscillation phase is randomly distributed, supporting the interferometric model shown in Fig. 1(c) and Eq. (1).

3.2 Cone reflectance temporal power spectrum peaks between 0.3 and 0.4 cyc/hr

The power spectra of the eight sample cones are shown in Fig. 5(b). The power spectra of most cones peaked at a frequency between 0.3 cyc/hr and 0.4 cyc/hr in all long coherence trials. Because the power spectrum is phase insensitive, we were able to average the spectra of all cones for a given trial and determine the overall peak frequency. The average power spectrum for all cones for trial 4 is shown in Fig. 5(b) (dark line), revealing a frequency peak at 0.37 cyc/hr. Similar peak frequencies were found in all trials using the long coherence source; these are shown in Table 1. In short, the thousands of cones that compose a given retinal patch were found to share common frequencies of oscillation. In striking contrast, when the short coherence source was used, no peak was evident in either the spectra of individual cones or their average. A long temporal coherence length is clearly a prerequisite for oscillations and further supports our interferometric model of the OS.

3.3 Oscillations present over 24 hours, with significant differences in frequency with time of day

In the 24-hour trial, oscillations occurred throughout the day and a distinct peak was present in the average power spectrum at 0.40 cyc/hr. Figure 6 shows daily variations in frequency, with the lowest frequency at 6pm and the highest at 3am. Though measured on just one subject, the observed small (17%) changes in frequency were significant, indicating the general capacity of our method to measure such diurnal changes and the potential to test for daily variations in disc renewal and shedding.

3.4 Oscillations likely due to elongation of cone outer segment

The model expressed in Eq. (1) suggests that a sinusoidal oscillation in cone reflectance requires a linear change in (2π/λ)2nL. While small changes may occur in the refractive index n of the cone OS, they cannot plausibly explain the multiple cycles of reflectivity change we observed in the 24-hour experiment, which would require at least an 8% change in the refractive index. For reference, an 8% increase or decrease, from an assumed baseline of 1.43, would result in refractive indices of 1.54 or 1.31, approximately those of pure lipid [20

20. K. F. A. Ross and J. T. Y. Chou, “The physical nature of the lipid globules in the living neurones of Helix aspersa as indicated by measurements of refractive index,” J. Cell Sci. 3, 341 (1957).

] and water, respectively. Linear shifts in the wavelength of the source λ could also cause reflectance oscillations, but the source spectrum was carefully monitored and was stable within 1 nm over at least 5 hours. Thus we conclude that the cause of the oscillations in cone reflectance is a linear change in outer segment length L. The model is indifferent to the sign of L—either contraction or elongation of the OS would cause sinusoidal reflectance changes. Given that elongation of the OS—due to disc renewal—over periods of hours is a well-established phenomenon [6

6. R. W. Young, “The renewal of photoreceptor cell outer segments,” J. Cell Biol. 33(1), 61–72 (1967). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] and that comparable contraction has not been reported, we conclude that the oscillations are due to the renewal of OS discs over the course of the day. Abrupt contraction of the OS can occur, as for example from disc shedding, but there is substantial evidence that this process occurs quickly, certainly much faster than the measurement period (hours) of our experiment. According to our interferometric model of the outer segment, disc shedding events would appear as abrupt shifts in the phase of the sinusoidal reflectance oscillation. Our data were not fully analyzed for these features, and in light of the wealth of evidence that lighting conditions play a crucial role in the timing of shedding events (see, for example [8

8. M. M. LaVail, “Rod outer segment disk shedding in rat retina: relationship to cyclic lighting,” Science 194(4269), 1071–1074 (1976). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,21

21. M. M. LaVail, “Circadian nature of rod outer segment disc shedding in the rat,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 19(4), 407–411 (1980). [PubMed]

27

27. R. W. Young, “The daily rhythm of shedding and degradation of rod and cone outer segment membranes in the chick retina,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 17(2), 105–116 (1978). [PubMed]

], ), the present experiment was not designed to elicit an observable burst of disc shedding.

Based on this conclusion, it follows from Eq. (1) that the rate of elongation of the cone OS (velocity of the outer segment PT relative to CC), can be expressed as
vPT=fλ2n
(2)
where f is the frequency of the reflectance oscillation measured in our experiments. Note that f can also be thought of as the Doppler frequency generated by vPT.

Using our measurements of f, the corresponding PT velocities were found to range from 93 nm/hr to 113 nm/hr, giving a range of daily disc renewal of 2.2 μm to 2.7 μm, daily variations in renewal rate notwithstanding. At the retinal locations imaged, the outer segments were measured with optical coherence tomography (Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering) to have average lengths of 29 μm, 27 μm and 29 μm, in subjects 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The daily renewal measurements correspond to 8.2% to 8.7% of the outer segment length, suggesting that the outer segment is completely replaced every 11 to 12 days.

Using R0λ/(4n) to estimate the smallest change in length detectable by our system, we found that the system was capable of detecting length changes in the cone OS of 139 nm, more than sufficient for detection of the daily renewal amounts of 2.2 to 2.7 µm.

4. Discussion

We found that over the course of the day, the reflectance of nearly all cones, under long coherence illumination, oscillated sinusoidally. Moreover, we observed that the phase of these oscillations varied randomly from cone to cone. These observations were predicted by the interferometric model of cone reflectance presented in Fig. 1(c) and Eq. (1), and thereby lend confirmation to the model. The model appears to describe accurately the reflectance of most cones under long coherence illumination. The model further predicts that no such oscillations in reflectance should occur when the cones are illuminated with short coherence light. The lack of oscillations in our short coherence trial (Trial 6) lends additional support to the model. Indeed, other investigators conducted an experiment in which the cone mosaic was imaged every hour over a 24-hour period using an incoherent visible illumination source [15

15. A. Pallikaris, D. R. Williams, and H. Hofer, “The reflectance of single cones in the living human eye,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 44(10), 4580–4592 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. While that study revealed changes in cone reflectance, both rapid changes occurring over matters of minutes and slow changes occurring over matters of hours, it did not show the highly prevalent, sinusoidal reflectance oscillations we observed using the long coherence source. Neither did that study claim to observe disc renewal or its optical correlates. While the experimental protocols—regular imaging over periods of hours—were similar between that experiment and our own, the differences in illumination sources—theirs incoherent and visible, ours coherent and near-infrared—make comparisons between the findings difficult. Based on current evidence, we believe the mechanisms underlying the main changes in cone reflectance observed in the two experiments to be disjoint. In terms of Eq. (1), changes in the cone’s brightness due to temporally incoherent illumination are described by Io, whereas temporally coherent effects are described by 2|Ψ1||Ψ2|cos((2π/λ)2nL). We determined that the main changes we observed in cone reflectance, viz. sinusoidal oscillations, were an effect of temporally coherent illumination. We did not observe the temporally incoherent effects observed by Pallikaris et al. There are many potential reasons for this: the incoherent cone effects they observed may require the visible stimulation of cones present in their experiment but not ours; alternatively, these effects were present but undetectable because they were either masked by the high amplitude coherent effects or the relatively low cone SNR imposed by near-infrared illumination [28

28. S. S. Choi, N. Doble, J. Lin, J. Christou, and D. R. Williams, “Effect of wavelength on in vivo images of the human cone mosaic,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 22(12), 2598–2605 (2005). [CrossRef]

].

Using the outer segment as a biological interferometer, we were able to track minute changes in its length, significantly smaller than the wavelength of the illumination source. We found that the rate of renewal can be determined within five hours and that renewal can be continually tracked over 24 hours while monitoring small but significant changes in its rate over the course of the day.

While it has not previously been possible to measure OS renewal rate in living animals, let alone humans, numerous ex vivo studies have been conducted to study these rates in mammalian rods. Daily rod renewal rates have been reported to be 1.8 to 2.2 μm /day in mice [6

6. R. W. Young, “The renewal of photoreceptor cell outer segments,” J. Cell Biol. 33(1), 61–72 (1967). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,29

29. M. M. LaVail, “Kinetics of rod outer segment renewal in the developing mouse retina,” J. Cell Biol. 58(3), 650–661 (1973). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,30

30. M. M. LaVail, “Photoreceptor characteristics in congenic strains of RCS rats,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 20(5), 671–675 (1981). [PubMed]

], 1.8 to 2 μm /day in dogs [31

31. N. Buyukmihci and G. D. Aguirre, “Rod disc turnover in the dog,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 15, 579–584 (1976).

,32

32. G. D. Aguirre and L. Andrews, “Nomarski evaluation of rod outer segment renewal in a hereditary retinal degeneration. Comparison with autoradiographic evaluation,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 28(7), 1049–1058 (1987). [PubMed]

], and 2.6 to 2.8 μm /day in rhesus monkeys [33

33. R. W. Young, “The renewal of rod and cone outer segments in the rhesus monkey,” J. Cell Biol. 49(2), 303–318 (1971). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. In mammalian cones, electron microscopy has been employed to measure the size of phagosomes in the RPE cells underlying the cone OS, found to be 1.6 μm /day in the squirrel [11

11. D. H. Anderson and S. K. Fisher, “Disc shedding in rodlike and conelike photoreceptors of tree squirrels,” Science 187(4180), 953–955 (1975). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], 1.15 um/day in the domestic cat [34

34. S. K. Fisher, B. A. Pfeffer, and D. H. Anderson, “Both rod and cone disc shedding are related to light onset in the cat,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 24(7), 844–856 (1983). [PubMed]

], and 1 to 3.23 μm /day in the Rhesus monkey [35

35. D. H. Anderson, S. K. Fisher, P. A. Erickson, and G. A. Tabor, “Rod and cone disc shedding in the rhesus monkey retina: a quantitative study,” Exp. Eye Res. 30(5), 559–574 (1980). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,36

36. C. J. Guérin, G. P. Lewis, S. K. Fisher, and D. H. Anderson, “Recovery of photoreceptor outer segment length and analysis of membrane assembly rates in regenerating primate photoreceptor outer segments,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 34(1), 175–183 (1993). [PubMed]

].

The rates of renewal we report here lie squarely within the range of renewal rates reported in the literature and agree with the estimates of daily disc shedding in cones, suggesting that we have developed an accurate method for measuring disc renewal in the living human eye. This is the first observation of renewal in a living eye and the first direct observation of renewal in cones. While the measurement period is currently long (5 hours), improvements are possible to significantly shorten it, which will enhance the technique’s practicality for measuring larger numbers of subjects.

The best existing method for depth imaging of the living retina is ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography (UHR-OCT), whose axial resolution has been reported to be 3 μm in retinal tissue [49

49. B. Cense, N. Nassif, T. Chen, M. Pierce, S. H. Yun, B. Park, B. Bouma, G. Tearney, and J. de Boer, “Ultrahigh-resolution high-speed retinal imaging using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express 12(11), 2435–2447 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,50

50. B. Cense, E. Koperda, J. M. Brown, O. P. Kocaoglu, W. Gao, R. S. Jonnal, and D. T. Miller, “Volumetric retinal imaging with ultrahigh-resolution spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and adaptive optics using two broadband light sources,” Opt. Express 17(5), 4095–4111 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Combined with AO, UHR-OCT can measure outer segment lengths of individual cones [50

50. B. Cense, E. Koperda, J. M. Brown, O. P. Kocaoglu, W. Gao, R. S. Jonnal, and D. T. Miller, “Volumetric retinal imaging with ultrahigh-resolution spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and adaptive optics using two broadband light sources,” Opt. Express 17(5), 4095–4111 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

52

52. E. J. Fernández, B. Hermann, B. Považay, A. Unterhuber, H. Sattmann, B. Hofer, P. K. Ahnelt, and W. Drexler, “Ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography and pancorrection for cellular imaging of the living human retina,” Opt. Express 16(15), 11083–11094 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. However, the axial resolution of UHR-OCT is likely insufficient to detect daily OS renewal, let alone that which occurs over matters of hours or daily variations in rate. Spectral-domain phase microscopy has demonstrated sub-nanometer resolution in in vitro applications [53

53. M. A. Choma, A. K. Ellerbee, C. Yang, T. L. Creazzo, and J. A. Izatt, “Spectral-domain phase microscopy,” Opt. Lett. 30(10), 1162–1164 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], but has not been demonstrated in vivo, likely because of the substantial phase noise introduced by eye motion even when the subject’s head is well stabilized. Our instrument may be thought of as a phase-sensitive common-path interferometer that uses the two opposing sides of the structure of interest (OS) as sample and reference surfaces. As such, the instrument is sensitive only to those phase changes that occur between the two surfaces. While we have targeted disc renewal, our method can be readily applied to other physiological processes that exhibit minute length or refractive index changes in the OS, as for example the processes of disc shedding and phototransduction.

Acknowledgements

Financial support was provided by the National Eye Institute grants 1R01EY018339 (D.T.M.) and 5R01 EY014743 (D.T.M.) and the National Science Foundation Science and Technology Center for Adaptive Optics, managed by the University of California at Santa Cruz under cooperative agreement No. AST-9876783 (D.T.M.). We thank W. Monette and T. Kemerly for electronics support; D. Jackson, T. Thacker, and J. Wood for machining support; S. Burns for use of his Heidelberg Spectralis OCT; J. Downing, J. Ybe, and M. Clegg for helpful discussions and reading of the manuscript.

References and links

1.

W. K. Noell, V. S. Walker, B. O. K. S. Kang, and S. Berman, “Retinal damage by light in rats,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 5, 450–473 (1966).

2.

D. T. Organisciak and B. S. Winkler, “Retinal light damage: practical and theoretical considerations,” Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 13(1), 1–29 (1994). [CrossRef]

3.

F. J. M. Daemen, “Vertebrate rod outer segment membranes,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta 300(3), 255–288 (1973). [PubMed]

4.

S. Futterman, “Metabolism and photochemistry in the retina,” in Physiology of the Eye, 6th ed., R. A. Moses, ed. (C. V. Mosby Co., St. Louis, 1975), pp. 406–419.

5.

B. Anderson Jr., “Ocular effects of changes in oxygen and carbon dioxide tension,” Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc. 66, 423–474 (1968). [PubMed]

6.

R. W. Young, “The renewal of photoreceptor cell outer segments,” J. Cell Biol. 33(1), 61–72 (1967). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7.

R. W. Young and D. Bok, “Participation of the retinal pigment epithelium in the rod outer segment renewal process,” J. Cell Biol. 42(2), 392–403 (1969). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8.

M. M. LaVail, “Rod outer segment disk shedding in rat retina: relationship to cyclic lighting,” Science 194(4269), 1071–1074 (1976). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9.

D. Bok, “Retinal photoreceptor-pigment epithelium interactions. Friedenwald lecture,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 26(12), 1659–1694 (1985). [PubMed]

10.

R. H. Steinberg, I. Wood, and R. H. Steinberg, “Phagocytosis by pigment epithelium of human retinal cones,” Nature 252(5481), 305–307 (1974). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

11.

D. H. Anderson and S. K. Fisher, “Disc shedding in rodlike and conelike photoreceptors of tree squirrels,” Science 187(4180), 953–955 (1975). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12.

R. S. Jonnal, J. Rha, Y. Zhang, B. Cense, W. Gao, and D. T. Miller, “In vivo functional imaging of human cone photoreceptors,” Opt. Express 15(24), 16141–16160 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13.

Y. Zhang, B. Cense, J. Rha, R. S. Jonnal, W. Gao, R. J. Zawadzki, J. S. Werner, S. Jones, S. Olivier, and D. T. Miller, “High-speed volumetric imaging of cone photoreceptors with adaptive optics spectral-domain optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express 14(10), 4380–4394 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14.

W. Gao, B. Cense, Y. Zhang, R. S. Jonnal, D. T. Miller, and D. T. Miller, “Measuring retinal contributions to the optical Stiles-Crawford effect with optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express 16(9), 6486–6501 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15.

A. Pallikaris, D. R. Williams, and H. Hofer, “The reflectance of single cones in the living human eye,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 44(10), 4580–4592 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16.

W. Snyder and C. Pask, “Stiles-crawford effect-explanation and consequences,” Vision Res. 13(6), 1115–1137 (1973). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

17.

Y. Zhang, J. Rha, R. S. Jonnal, and D. T. Miller, “Adaptive optics parallel spectral domain optical coherence tomography for imaging the living retina,” Opt. Express 13(12), 4792–4811 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

18.

J. Rha, R. S. Jonnal, K. E. Thorn, J. Qu, Y. Zhang, and D. T. Miller, “Adaptive optics flood-illumination camera for high speed retinal imaging,” Opt. Express 14(10), 4552–4569 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

19.

C. A. Curcio, K. R. Sloan, R. E. Kalina, and A. E. Hendrickson, “Human photoreceptor topography,” J. Comp. Neurol. 292(4), 497–523 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

20.

K. F. A. Ross and J. T. Y. Chou, “The physical nature of the lipid globules in the living neurones of Helix aspersa as indicated by measurements of refractive index,” J. Cell Sci. 3, 341 (1957).

21.

M. M. LaVail, “Circadian nature of rod outer segment disc shedding in the rat,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 19(4), 407–411 (1980). [PubMed]

22.

C. Bobu and D. Hicks, “Regulation of retinal photoreceptor phagocytosis in a diurnal mammal by circadian clocks and ambient lighting,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 50(7), 3495–3502 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

23.

A. I. Goldman, P. S. Teirstein, and P. J. O’Brien, “The role of ambient lighting in circadian disc shedding in the rod outer segment of the rat retina,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 19(11), 1257–1267 (1980). [PubMed]

24.

M. S. Grace, A. Chiba, and M. Menaker, “Circadian control of photoreceptor outer segment membrane turnover in mice genetically incapable of melatonin synthesis,” Vis. Neurosci. 16(5), 909–918 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

25.

F. Nandrot, and S. C. Finnemann, “Altered rhythm of photoreceptor outer segment phagocytosis in b5 integrin knockout mice,” in Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology: Retinal Degenerative Diseases, J. G. Hollyfield, R. H. Anderson, and M. M. LaVail, eds. (Springer, New York, 2006), pp. 119–123.

26.

G. Tosini and C. Fukuhara, “The mammalian retina as a clock,” Cell Tissue Res. 309(1), 119–126 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

27.

R. W. Young, “The daily rhythm of shedding and degradation of rod and cone outer segment membranes in the chick retina,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 17(2), 105–116 (1978). [PubMed]

28.

S. S. Choi, N. Doble, J. Lin, J. Christou, and D. R. Williams, “Effect of wavelength on in vivo images of the human cone mosaic,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 22(12), 2598–2605 (2005). [CrossRef]

29.

M. M. LaVail, “Kinetics of rod outer segment renewal in the developing mouse retina,” J. Cell Biol. 58(3), 650–661 (1973). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

30.

M. M. LaVail, “Photoreceptor characteristics in congenic strains of RCS rats,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 20(5), 671–675 (1981). [PubMed]

31.

N. Buyukmihci and G. D. Aguirre, “Rod disc turnover in the dog,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 15, 579–584 (1976).

32.

G. D. Aguirre and L. Andrews, “Nomarski evaluation of rod outer segment renewal in a hereditary retinal degeneration. Comparison with autoradiographic evaluation,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 28(7), 1049–1058 (1987). [PubMed]

33.

R. W. Young, “The renewal of rod and cone outer segments in the rhesus monkey,” J. Cell Biol. 49(2), 303–318 (1971). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

34.

S. K. Fisher, B. A. Pfeffer, and D. H. Anderson, “Both rod and cone disc shedding are related to light onset in the cat,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 24(7), 844–856 (1983). [PubMed]

35.

D. H. Anderson, S. K. Fisher, P. A. Erickson, and G. A. Tabor, “Rod and cone disc shedding in the rhesus monkey retina: a quantitative study,” Exp. Eye Res. 30(5), 559–574 (1980). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

36.

C. J. Guérin, G. P. Lewis, S. K. Fisher, and D. H. Anderson, “Recovery of photoreceptor outer segment length and analysis of membrane assembly rates in regenerating primate photoreceptor outer segments,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 34(1), 175–183 (1993). [PubMed]

37.

D. Vollrath, A. Gal, Y. Li, D. A. Thompson, J. Weir, U. Orth, S. G. Jacobson, and E. Apfelstedt-Sylla, “Mutations in MERTK, the human orthologue of the RCS rat retinal dystrophy gene, cause retinitis pigmentosa,” Nat. Genet. 26(3), 270–271 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

38.

A. L. Kindzelskii, V. M. Elner, S. G. Elner, D. Yang, B. A. Hughes, and H. R. Petty, “Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) of retinal pigment epithelial cells participates in transmembrane signaling in response to photoreceptor outer segments,” J. Gen. Physiol. 124(2), 139–149 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

39.

S. Zareparsi, M. Buraczynska, K. E. H. Branham, S. Shah, D. Eng, M. Li, H. Pawar, B. M. Yashar, S. E. Moroi, P. R. Lichter, H. R. Petty, J. E. Richards, G. R. Abecasis, V. M. Elner, and A. Swaroop, “Toll-like receptor 4 variant D299G is associated with susceptibility to age-related macular degeneration,” Hum. Mol. Genet. 14(11), 1449–1455 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

40.

A. Grinvald, E. Lieke, R. D. Frostig, C. D. Gilbert, and T. N. Wiesel, “Functional architecture of cortex revealed by optical imaging of intrinsic signals,” Nature 324(6095), 361–364 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

41.

P. J. DeLint, T. T. Berendschot, J. van de Kraats, and D. van Norren, “Slow optical changes in human photoreceptors induced by light,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 41(1), 282–289 (2000). [PubMed]

42.

K. Tsunoda, Y. Oguchi, G. Hanazono, and M. Tanifuji, “Mapping cone- and rod-induced retinal responsiveness in macaque retina by optical imaging,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45(10), 3820–3826 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

43.

K. Bizheva, R. Pflug, B. Hermann, B. Povazay, H. Sattmann, P. Qiu, E. Anger, H. Reitsamer, S. Popov, J. R. Taylor, A. Unterhuber, P. Ahnelt, and W. Drexler, “Optophysiology: depth-resolved probing of retinal physiology with functional ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103(13), 5066–5071 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

44.

V. J. Srinivasan, M. Wojtkowski, J. G. Fujimoto, and J. S. Duker, “In vivo measurement of retinal physiology with high-speed ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett. 31(15), 2308–2310 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

45.

X. C. Yao and J. S. George, “Near-infrared imaging of fast intrinsic optical responses in visible light-activated amphibian retina,” J. Biomed. Opt. 11(6), 064030 (2006). [CrossRef]

46.

K. Grieve and A. Roorda, “Intrinsic signals from human cone photoreceptors,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 49(2), 713–719 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

47.

M. D. Abràmoff, Y. H. Kwon, D. Ts’o, P. Soliz, B. Zimmerman, J. Pokorny, and R. Kardon, “Visual stimulus-induced changes in human near-infrared fundus reflectance,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 47(2), 715–721 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

48.

D. G. Birch, E. L. Berson, and M. A. Sandberg, “Diurnal rhythm in the human rod ERG,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 25(2), 236–238 (1984). [PubMed]

49.

B. Cense, N. Nassif, T. Chen, M. Pierce, S. H. Yun, B. Park, B. Bouma, G. Tearney, and J. de Boer, “Ultrahigh-resolution high-speed retinal imaging using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express 12(11), 2435–2447 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

50.

B. Cense, E. Koperda, J. M. Brown, O. P. Kocaoglu, W. Gao, R. S. Jonnal, and D. T. Miller, “Volumetric retinal imaging with ultrahigh-resolution spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and adaptive optics using two broadband light sources,” Opt. Express 17(5), 4095–4111 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

51.

R. J. Zawadzki, B. Cense, Y. Zhang, S. S. Choi, D. T. Miller, and J. S. Werner, “Ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography with monochromatic and chromatic aberration correction,” Opt. Express 16(11), 8126–8143 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

52.

E. J. Fernández, B. Hermann, B. Považay, A. Unterhuber, H. Sattmann, B. Hofer, P. K. Ahnelt, and W. Drexler, “Ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography and pancorrection for cellular imaging of the living human retina,” Opt. Express 16(15), 11083–11094 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

53.

M. A. Choma, A. K. Ellerbee, C. Yang, T. L. Creazzo, and J. A. Izatt, “Spectral-domain phase microscopy,” Opt. Lett. 30(10), 1162–1164 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

OCIS Codes
(170.3880) Medical optics and biotechnology : Medical and biological imaging
(330.4270) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision system neurophysiology
(330.5310) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision - photoreceptors
(170.2655) Medical optics and biotechnology : Functional monitoring and imaging
(100.3175) Image processing : Interferometric imaging
(110.1080) Imaging systems : Active or adaptive optics

ToC Category:
Vision, Color, and Visual Optics

History
Original Manuscript: December 22, 2009
Revised Manuscript: February 14, 2010
Manuscript Accepted: February 18, 2010
Published: February 26, 2010

Virtual Issues
Vol. 5, Iss. 6 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Ravi S. Jonnal, Jason R. Besecker, Jack C. Derby, Omer P. Kocaoglu, Barry Cense, Weihua Gao, Qiang Wang, and Donald T. Miller, "Imaging outer segment renewal in living human cone photoreceptors," Opt. Express 18, 5257-5270 (2010)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/vjbo/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-18-5-5257


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. W. K. Noell, V. S. Walker, B. O. K. S. Kang, and S. Berman, “Retinal damage by light in rats,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 5, 450–473 (1966).
  2. D. T. Organisciak and B. S. Winkler, “Retinal light damage: practical and theoretical considerations,” Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 13(1), 1–29 (1994). [CrossRef]
  3. F. J. M. Daemen, “Vertebrate rod outer segment membranes,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta 300(3), 255–288 (1973). [PubMed]
  4. S. Futterman, “Metabolism and photochemistry in the retina,” in Physiology of the Eye, 6th ed., R. A. Moses, ed. (C. V. Mosby Co., St. Louis, 1975), pp. 406–419.
  5. B. Anderson., “Ocular effects of changes in oxygen and carbon dioxide tension,” Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc. 66, 423–474 (1968). [PubMed]
  6. R. W. Young, “The renewal of photoreceptor cell outer segments,” J. Cell Biol. 33(1), 61–72 (1967). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. R. W. Young and D. Bok, “Participation of the retinal pigment epithelium in the rod outer segment renewal process,” J. Cell Biol. 42(2), 392–403 (1969). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. M. M. LaVail, “Rod outer segment disk shedding in rat retina: relationship to cyclic lighting,” Science 194(4269), 1071–1074 (1976). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. D. Bok, “Retinal photoreceptor-pigment epithelium interactions. Friedenwald lecture,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 26(12), 1659–1694 (1985). [PubMed]
  10. R. H. Steinberg, I. Wood, and R. H. Steinberg, “Phagocytosis by pigment epithelium of human retinal cones,” Nature 252(5481), 305–307 (1974). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. D. H. Anderson and S. K. Fisher, “Disc shedding in rodlike and conelike photoreceptors of tree squirrels,” Science 187(4180), 953–955 (1975). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. R. S. Jonnal, J. Rha, Y. Zhang, B. Cense, W. Gao, and D. T. Miller, “In vivo functional imaging of human cone photoreceptors,” Opt. Express 15(24), 16141–16160 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Y. Zhang, B. Cense, J. Rha, R. S. Jonnal, W. Gao, R. J. Zawadzki, J. S. Werner, S. Jones, S. Olivier, and D. T. Miller, “High-speed volumetric imaging of cone photoreceptors with adaptive optics spectral-domain optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express 14(10), 4380–4394 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. W. Gao, B. Cense, Y. Zhang, R. S. Jonnal, D. T. Miller, and D. T. Miller, “Measuring retinal contributions to the optical Stiles-Crawford effect with optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express 16(9), 6486–6501 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. A. Pallikaris, D. R. Williams, and H. Hofer, “The reflectance of single cones in the living human eye,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 44(10), 4580–4592 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. W. Snyder and C. Pask, “Stiles-crawford effect-explanation and consequences,” Vision Res. 13(6), 1115–1137 (1973). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Y. Zhang, J. Rha, R. S. Jonnal, and D. T. Miller, “Adaptive optics parallel spectral domain optical coherence tomography for imaging the living retina,” Opt. Express 13(12), 4792–4811 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. J. Rha, R. S. Jonnal, K. E. Thorn, J. Qu, Y. Zhang, and D. T. Miller, “Adaptive optics flood-illumination camera for high speed retinal imaging,” Opt. Express 14(10), 4552–4569 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. C. A. Curcio, K. R. Sloan, R. E. Kalina, and A. E. Hendrickson, “Human photoreceptor topography,” J. Comp. Neurol. 292(4), 497–523 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. K. F. A. Ross and J. T. Y. Chou, “The physical nature of the lipid globules in the living neurones of Helix aspersa as indicated by measurements of refractive index,” J. Cell Sci. 3, 341 (1957).
  21. M. M. LaVail, “Circadian nature of rod outer segment disc shedding in the rat,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 19(4), 407–411 (1980). [PubMed]
  22. C. Bobu and D. Hicks, “Regulation of retinal photoreceptor phagocytosis in a diurnal mammal by circadian clocks and ambient lighting,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 50(7), 3495–3502 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. A. I. Goldman, P. S. Teirstein, and P. J. O’Brien, “The role of ambient lighting in circadian disc shedding in the rod outer segment of the rat retina,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 19(11), 1257–1267 (1980). [PubMed]
  24. M. S. Grace, A. Chiba, and M. Menaker, “Circadian control of photoreceptor outer segment membrane turnover in mice genetically incapable of melatonin synthesis,” Vis. Neurosci. 16(5), 909–918 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. F. Nandrot, and S. C. Finnemann, “Altered rhythm of photoreceptor outer segment phagocytosis in b5 integrin knockout mice,” in Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology: Retinal Degenerative Diseases, J. G. Hollyfield, R. H. Anderson, and M. M. LaVail, eds. (Springer, New York, 2006), pp. 119–123.
  26. G. Tosini and C. Fukuhara, “The mammalian retina as a clock,” Cell Tissue Res. 309(1), 119–126 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. R. W. Young, “The daily rhythm of shedding and degradation of rod and cone outer segment membranes in the chick retina,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 17(2), 105–116 (1978). [PubMed]
  28. S. S. Choi, N. Doble, J. Lin, J. Christou, and D. R. Williams, “Effect of wavelength on in vivo images of the human cone mosaic,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 22(12), 2598–2605 (2005). [CrossRef]
  29. M. M. LaVail, “Kinetics of rod outer segment renewal in the developing mouse retina,” J. Cell Biol. 58(3), 650–661 (1973). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. M. M. LaVail, “Photoreceptor characteristics in congenic strains of RCS rats,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 20(5), 671–675 (1981). [PubMed]
  31. N. Buyukmihci and G. D. Aguirre, “Rod disc turnover in the dog,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 15, 579–584 (1976).
  32. G. D. Aguirre and L. Andrews, “Nomarski evaluation of rod outer segment renewal in a hereditary retinal degeneration. Comparison with autoradiographic evaluation,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 28(7), 1049–1058 (1987). [PubMed]
  33. R. W. Young, “The renewal of rod and cone outer segments in the rhesus monkey,” J. Cell Biol. 49(2), 303–318 (1971). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. S. K. Fisher, B. A. Pfeffer, and D. H. Anderson, “Both rod and cone disc shedding are related to light onset in the cat,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 24(7), 844–856 (1983). [PubMed]
  35. D. H. Anderson, S. K. Fisher, P. A. Erickson, and G. A. Tabor, “Rod and cone disc shedding in the rhesus monkey retina: a quantitative study,” Exp. Eye Res. 30(5), 559–574 (1980). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. C. J. Guérin, G. P. Lewis, S. K. Fisher, and D. H. Anderson, “Recovery of photoreceptor outer segment length and analysis of membrane assembly rates in regenerating primate photoreceptor outer segments,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 34(1), 175–183 (1993). [PubMed]
  37. D. Vollrath, A. Gal, Y. Li, D. A. Thompson, J. Weir, U. Orth, S. G. Jacobson, and E. Apfelstedt-Sylla, “Mutations in MERTK, the human orthologue of the RCS rat retinal dystrophy gene, cause retinitis pigmentosa,” Nat. Genet. 26(3), 270–271 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. A. L. Kindzelskii, V. M. Elner, S. G. Elner, D. Yang, B. A. Hughes, and H. R. Petty, “Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) of retinal pigment epithelial cells participates in transmembrane signaling in response to photoreceptor outer segments,” J. Gen. Physiol. 124(2), 139–149 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. S. Zareparsi, M. Buraczynska, K. E. H. Branham, S. Shah, D. Eng, M. Li, H. Pawar, B. M. Yashar, S. E. Moroi, P. R. Lichter, H. R. Petty, J. E. Richards, G. R. Abecasis, V. M. Elner, and A. Swaroop, “Toll-like receptor 4 variant D299G is associated with susceptibility to age-related macular degeneration,” Hum. Mol. Genet. 14(11), 1449–1455 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. A. Grinvald, E. Lieke, R. D. Frostig, C. D. Gilbert, and T. N. Wiesel, “Functional architecture of cortex revealed by optical imaging of intrinsic signals,” Nature 324(6095), 361–364 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. P. J. DeLint, T. T. Berendschot, J. van de Kraats, and D. van Norren, “Slow optical changes in human photoreceptors induced by light,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 41(1), 282–289 (2000). [PubMed]
  42. K. Tsunoda, Y. Oguchi, G. Hanazono, and M. Tanifuji, “Mapping cone- and rod-induced retinal responsiveness in macaque retina by optical imaging,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45(10), 3820–3826 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. K. Bizheva, R. Pflug, B. Hermann, B. Povazay, H. Sattmann, P. Qiu, E. Anger, H. Reitsamer, S. Popov, J. R. Taylor, A. Unterhuber, P. Ahnelt, and W. Drexler, “Optophysiology: depth-resolved probing of retinal physiology with functional ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103(13), 5066–5071 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. V. J. Srinivasan, M. Wojtkowski, J. G. Fujimoto, and J. S. Duker, “In vivo measurement of retinal physiology with high-speed ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett. 31(15), 2308–2310 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. X. C. Yao and J. S. George, “Near-infrared imaging of fast intrinsic optical responses in visible light-activated amphibian retina,” J. Biomed. Opt. 11(6), 064030 (2006). [CrossRef]
  46. K. Grieve and A. Roorda, “Intrinsic signals from human cone photoreceptors,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 49(2), 713–719 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. M. D. Abràmoff, Y. H. Kwon, D. Ts’o, P. Soliz, B. Zimmerman, J. Pokorny, and R. Kardon, “Visual stimulus-induced changes in human near-infrared fundus reflectance,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 47(2), 715–721 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. D. G. Birch, E. L. Berson, and M. A. Sandberg, “Diurnal rhythm in the human rod ERG,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 25(2), 236–238 (1984). [PubMed]
  49. B. Cense, N. Nassif, T. Chen, M. Pierce, S. H. Yun, B. Park, B. Bouma, G. Tearney, and J. de Boer, “Ultrahigh-resolution high-speed retinal imaging using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express 12(11), 2435–2447 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. B. Cense, E. Koperda, J. M. Brown, O. P. Kocaoglu, W. Gao, R. S. Jonnal, and D. T. Miller, “Volumetric retinal imaging with ultrahigh-resolution spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and adaptive optics using two broadband light sources,” Opt. Express 17(5), 4095–4111 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. R. J. Zawadzki, B. Cense, Y. Zhang, S. S. Choi, D. T. Miller, and J. S. Werner, “Ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography with monochromatic and chromatic aberration correction,” Opt. Express 16(11), 8126–8143 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. E. J. Fernández, B. Hermann, B. Považay, A. Unterhuber, H. Sattmann, B. Hofer, P. K. Ahnelt, and W. Drexler, “Ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography and pancorrection for cellular imaging of the living human retina,” Opt. Express 16(15), 11083–11094 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. M. A. Choma, A. K. Ellerbee, C. Yang, T. L. Creazzo, and J. A. Izatt, “Spectral-domain phase microscopy,” Opt. Lett. 30(10), 1162–1164 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Multimedia

Multimedia FilesRecommended Software
» Media 1: AVI (6425 KB)      QuickTime

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited