OSA's Digital Library

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

| EXPLORING THE INTERFACE OF LIGHT AND BIOMEDICINE

  • Editors: Andrew Dunn and Anthony Durkin
  • Vol. 6, Iss. 4 — May. 4, 2011
« Show journal navigation

Optimizing silver film for surface plasmon-coupled emission induced two-photon excited fluorescence imaging

Kuo-Chih Chiu, Chun-Yu Lin, Chen Yuan Dong, and Shean-Jen Chen  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 19, Issue 6, pp. 5386-5396 (2011)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.005386


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1073 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

In this study, the optimal condition of a silver (Ag) film deposited on a cover slip for surface plasmon-coupled emission (SPCE) induced two-photon excited fluorescence (TPEF) based on an objective-based, total internal reflection (TIR) microscope was investigated. According to the theoretical simulations of local electric field enhancement and fluorescence coupled emission efficiency, the thickness of the Ag film should be about 40 nm in order to maximize the TPEF collection efficiency by the objective. The deposited Ag film with a germanium seed layer on a cover slip exhibits additional improvement in surface smoothness by reducing variations in surface roughness to below 1.0 nm, thereby reduces local hot spots which degrade the image uniformity. Moreover, an Ag film with a 20 nm-thick SiO2 spacer not only prevents damage caused through interaction with the aqueous solution under high laser power irradiance, but also reduces the fluorescence quenching effect by the Ag film. By optimizing the Ag film thickness, surface smoothness, and a protective dielectric spacer, efficient TIR TPEF imaging can be achieved through SPCE.

© 2011 OSA

1. Introduction

In an effort to develop more efficient fluorescence-based immunoassays, metallic surfaces or particles have been explored as substrates for enhancing molecular fluorescence [1

1. K. Tawa and W. Knoll, “Mismatching base-pair dependence of the kinetics of DNA-DNA hybridization studied by surface plasmon fluorescence spectroscopy,” Nucleic Acids Res. 32(8), 2372–2377 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4

4. O. Stranik, H. M. McEvoy, C. McDonagh, and B. D. MacCraith, “Plasmonic enhancement of fluorescence for sensor applications,” Sens. Actuators B Chem. 107(1), 148–153 (2005). [CrossRef]

]. By exciting surface plasmons (SPs) from the metallic surfaces or nanoparticles, local electromagnetic (EM) field around the fluorophores is enhanced, resulting in increased efficiency of fluorescence excitation [4

4. O. Stranik, H. M. McEvoy, C. McDonagh, and B. D. MacCraith, “Plasmonic enhancement of fluorescence for sensor applications,” Sens. Actuators B Chem. 107(1), 148–153 (2005). [CrossRef]

]. SPs are the oscillations of the free electrons located on the surface of a metal film, and typically are excited by incident light through prism-coupled total internal reflection (TIR) or grating-coupled diffraction methods [5

5. H. Raether, Surface Plasmons on Smooth and Rough Surfaces and on Gratings (Springer, 1998).

]. The prism-coupled excitation scheme can also be replaced by a highly oblique, collimated beam produced by focusing a light beam at the outer region of the back focal plane (BFP) of a high numerical aperture (NA) objective [6

6. B. Huang, F. Yu, and R. N. Zare, “Surface plasmon resonance imaging using a high numerical aperture microscope objective,” Anal. Chem. 79(7), 2979–2983 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. When the wave vector of the incident evanescent, transverse magnetic (TM) light matches that of the SPs, the phenomenon of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) occurs, and the local EM field associated with SPR becomes greatly enhanced [5

5. H. Raether, Surface Plasmons on Smooth and Rough Surfaces and on Gratings (Springer, 1998).

]. As a result, fluorescence intensity from chromophores located on the metal surface can become greatly enhanced via the SP excitation mechanism.

Due to their complex dielectric constants with a large negative real part, gold (Au) and silver (Ag) films are ideal candidates for SP excitation in the visible and near infrared (NIR) range. Theoretical simulations also indicate that Ag film provides superior electric field enhancement at the NIR region which can result in the enhancement of two-photon excited fluorescence (TPEF). When the thickness of the Ag film is about 50 nm, the SP excitation based on the objective-based TIR method can be optimized to greatly enhance the local electric field. However, collection of the excited fluorescence by the objective is significantly reduced due to the presence of the 50 nm Ag film resulting in a decrease of the fluorescence coupled emission efficiency. Therefore, to improve SP-enhanced TPEF using the objective-coupled TIR method, a thinner Ag film capable of local electric field enhancement and improved fluorescence detection efficiency should be adopted [7

7. C.-Y. Lin, K.-C. Chiu, C.-Y. Chang, S.-H. Chang, T.-F. Guo, and S.-J. Chen, “Surface plasmon-enhanced and quenched two-photon excited fluorescence,” Opt. Express 18(12), 12807–12817 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Moreover, simulation shows that a decrease in the Ag film thickness would result in a decreased SPR angle. As a result, the requirement of achieving high incident angle through a microscope objective can be relaxed.

In addition to thickness of the Ag film, its surface roughness is also an important parameter in the optimizing SP effects. In particular, the surface roughness of an Ag film deposited on a dielectric substrate by the use of techniques such as sputtering, e-beam evaporation, and chemical vapor deposition, is a few nanometers in root-mean-square (RMS) [8

8. V. Kapaklis, P. Poulopoulos, V. Karoutsos, T. Manouras, and C. Politis, “Growth of thin Ag films produced by radio frequency magnetron sputtering,” Thin Solid Films 510(1-2), 138–142 (2006). [CrossRef]

11

11. Y. Chi, E. Lay, T.-Y. Chou, Y.-H. Song, and A. J. Carty, “Deposition of silver thin films using the pyrazolate complex [Ag(3,5-(CF3)2C3HN2)]3,” Chem. Vap. Deposition 11(4), 206–212 (2005). [CrossRef]

]. In recent studies, an ultrasmooth Ag film was achieved by e-beam evaporation of the Ag source on Si(100) substrates by the use of a germanium (Ge) nucleation layer [12

12. N. P. Kobayashi, M. S. Islam, W. Wu, P. Chaturvedi, N. X. Fang, S. Y. Wang, and R. S. Williams, “Ultrasmooth silver thin films deposited with a germanium nucleation layer,” Nano Lett. 9(1), 178–182 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. Through this technique, a surface roughness below 1.0 nm (RMS) can be achieved. A similar by e-beam evaporation technique deposits the Ag film on a nickel (Ni) seed layer located on a silicon or quartz substrate [13

13. H. Liu, B. Wang, E. S. P. Leong, P. Yang, Y. Zong, G. Si, J. Teng, and S. A. Maier, “Enhanced surface plasmon resonance on a smooth silver film with a seed growth layer,” ACS Nano 4(6), 3139–3146 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. In this manner, the surface roughness can be reduced from > 4 nm for a pure Ag film to around 1.3 nm RMS for the Ag/Ni film. Therefore, a smooth Ag/Ni film located on the quartz substrate can be used to optimize the SP phenomenon for plasmonic and metamaterials applications [13

13. H. Liu, B. Wang, E. S. P. Leong, P. Yang, Y. Zong, G. Si, J. Teng, and S. A. Maier, “Enhanced surface plasmon resonance on a smooth silver film with a seed growth layer,” ACS Nano 4(6), 3139–3146 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Specifically, artifacts associated with rough surfaces (strong scatterings, broadened SPR curves, and decreased SPR sensitivities) can be reduced [5

5. H. Raether, Surface Plasmons on Smooth and Rough Surfaces and on Gratings (Springer, 1998).

,13

13. H. Liu, B. Wang, E. S. P. Leong, P. Yang, Y. Zong, G. Si, J. Teng, and S. A. Maier, “Enhanced surface plasmon resonance on a smooth silver film with a seed growth layer,” ACS Nano 4(6), 3139–3146 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,14

14. A. Kolomenski, A. Kolomenskii, J. Noel, S. Peng, and H. Schuessler, “Propagation length of surface plasmons in a metal film with roughness,” Appl. Opt. 48(30), 5683–5691 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

In addition to the importance of surface thickness, roughness, and spacer, the stability of the silver film to resist water damage is also crucial for practical and dynamical imaging. Therefore, in this study, we attempt to investigate the optimal condition for SPCE induced TPEF imaging under aqueous solution by fabricating an Ag film with an appropriate thickness, a low surface roughness, and a dielectric protection spacer. Finally, TIR TPEF images taken using the objective-coupled evanescence wave microscopy through the enhancement of the SPCE are demonstrated.

2. Experimental setup

2.1. Objective-coupled evanescence wave microscope

Shown in Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of the optical setup of the TPEF evanescence wave microscopy based on the objective-coupled TIR method. Red and green lines indicate the respective optical paths of the excitation source and fluorescence collection.
is the schematic diagram of the oil immersion objective-based evanescence wave microscope. A 700-1000 nm femtosecond titanium-sapphire (ti-sa) laser (Tsunami, Newport) with a pulse width of 100 fs and repetition rate of 80 MHz was used as the excitation source. After passing through a half-wave plate and a linear polarizer for polarization and power control, the laser source is reflected by mirrors and guided into the microscope by a focusing lens. A mirror and a lens were fixed on a linear translation stage in order to adjust the position of the focal point on the back focal plane (BFP) of the high NA oil-immersion objective (60 × , NA = 1.49, Nikon). After passage through the objective, a quasi-collimating laser beam was formed. The incident angle of the quasi-collimating beam was manipulated by adjusting the focal position on the BFP via movement of the linear translation stage, which allows for adjustment of the incident angle up to 79.5°. The fluorescence was collected by the same objective and passed through a dichroic mirror, a shortpass filter (SPF, λ < 680 nm, Semrock), a bandpass filter (BPF, λ = 500-535 nm, Semrock), and an imaging lens prior to image acquisition by a high-speed frame rate EMCCD camera (iXon DV885, Andor).

2.2. Thin film deposition

A BK7 glass cover slip was used as the substrate and was first cleaned by isopropyl alcohol, acetone, and ethanol in sequence. Next, the cover slip was cleaned in Piranha solution (H2SO4:H2O2 (3:1)), and then dried with N2 gas before the sputtering process. Radio-frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering was used to deposit various thin films on the BK7 cover slip. The working gas was argon with pressure was set at the 0.2 mtorr for sputtering. The deposition rate can be adjusted by controlling the sputtering power for various materials. In our experiments, the sputtering powers of Ge layer, Ag film, and silicon dioxide (SiO2) layer were 20 W, 25 W, and 200 W, respectively. The deposition rates of the Ge layer, Ag film, and SiO2 layer were 0.0075 nm/s, 0.057 nm/s, and 0.056 nm/s, respectively.

3. Results and discussions

3.1. Silver film versus gold film with appropriate thickness

Both Au and Ag are suitable as the metal film for SP excitation in the visible light and NIR regions. Au is a preferred choice for bio-applications due to its inert nature. However, a superior enhancement of local electric field can be achieved by exciting the SPs using an Ag film at the excitation wavelength of 780 nm. At 780 nm, the refractive indices of the water solution, Ag film, and BK7 cover slip (H2O/Ag/BK7) are 1.3290, 0.1432 + j5.1304, and 1.5188, respectively [24

24. E. D. Palik, Handbook of Optical Constant of Solids (Academic, 1985).

]. By the use of these parameters in the Fresnel equations, the electric field enhancement of the Ag film at the SPR angle as a function of thickness can be obtained and the results are shown in Fig. 2(a)
Fig. 2 (a) Electric field enhancement and (b) fluorescence coupled emission as function of Ag film thickness. (c) Electric field enhancement and (d) fluorescence coupled emission as function of the Au film thickness.
. The thickness of the Ag film with the maximum electric field enhancement is about 50 nm. The maximum enhancement is about 60-fold for the vertical electric field (|Ez|2), but is only about 4-fold for the horizontal electric field (|Ex|2).

Figures 2(c) and 2(d) show the electric field enhancement and the fluorescence coupled emission for the Au film. The refractive index of the Au film is n 1 = 0.1754 + j4.9123 at 780 nm and n 1 = 0.6318 + j2.0984 at the center emission wavelength of 515 nm. The trend of electric field enhancement for the Au film is similar to that of the Ag film. At the film thickness of 50 nm, the maximum enhancement is about 45-fold for the vertical electric field and 4-fold for the horizontal electric field. However, the fluorescence coupled emission power for the VED dramatically drops when the thickness is increased above to 15 nm. For the HED, the fluorescence coupled emission is also absorbed by the Au film. Based on considerations of the electric field enhancement and fluorescence coupled emission efficiency, the Ag film is superior to the Au film as a substrate for TPEF. Moreover, the appropriate thickness of the Ag film should be between 32 nm and 50 nm, as found in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b). However, it is difficult to find an appropriate thickness of the Au film with an acceptable enhancement and coupling, as observed in Figs. 2(c) and 2(d). The TPEF intensity collected by the high NA oil-immersion objective is proportional to the square of the intensity enhancement and the fluorescence collection efficiency. A thinner Ag film can provide superior fluorescence collection efficiency. However, the enhancement of the local electric field intensity is lower than that of an Ag film with a 50 nm thickness. Therefore, the thickness of the Ag film was chosen to be 40 nm for SPCE TPEF imaging.

3.2. Silver film with optimal evenness on cover slip

The surface evenness of an Ag film deposited directly on a glass substrate is usually a few nanometers (RMS). In an attempt to improve upon the smoothness of the Ag film, a seed layer of Ge was used in depositing a 40 nm Ag film on the cover slip (0.17 mm). The surface morphology of the sample was measured using the tapping mode of a NT-MDT supplier atomic force microscope (AFM). The scan size and scan rate were 1 μm x 1 μm (512 x 512 pixels) and 1 Hz per line, respectively. Following typical cleaning procedures, the average RMS surface roughness of the cover slip was determined to be less than 0.3 nm within a randomly selected region of 1 μm2. Figures 3(a)
Fig. 3 AFM topography analysis of: (a) 40 nm Ag film, (b) 40 nm Ag film with a 2 nm Ge seed layer, and (c) 2 nm Ge on cover glasses. (d)-(f) are the corresponding histograms of the 2D surface-height values of (a)-(c).
and 3(b) show the respective AFM images of the Ag film without and with the Ge seed layer on the cover slips. As a reference, the surface morphology of the Ge layer on the cover slip is shown in Fig. 3(c). In this case, a surface roughness of about 0.4 nm was found. In addition, histograms of the two-dimensional (2D) surface-height values of Figs. 3(a)-3(c) are respectively shown in Figs. 3(d)-3(f). The average RMS surface roughness of a pure Ag film is ~4.7 nm, with a peak-to-valley height of ~27.0 nm. In comparison, the average RMS surface roughness and the peak-to-valley height of the Ag/Ge film improved to ~1.0 nm and ~8.0 nm, respectively. Therefore, the Ag/Ge film deposited on the cover slip by direct RF sputtering exhibits a smaller RMS surface roughness and a narrower peak-to-valley surface topological height distribution as compared to the case when the Ag film was directly deposited onto the cover slip. SPs on rough surfaces lead to phenomena such as broadened SPR curves and decreased SPR sensitivities. The influence of surface roughness can be evaluated via a variation of metal permittivity [5

5. H. Raether, Surface Plasmons on Smooth and Rough Surfaces and on Gratings (Springer, 1998).

,13

13. H. Liu, B. Wang, E. S. P. Leong, P. Yang, Y. Zong, G. Si, J. Teng, and S. A. Maier, “Enhanced surface plasmon resonance on a smooth silver film with a seed growth layer,” ACS Nano 4(6), 3139–3146 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,14

14. A. Kolomenski, A. Kolomenskii, J. Noel, S. Peng, and H. Schuessler, “Propagation length of surface plasmons in a metal film with roughness,” Appl. Opt. 48(30), 5683–5691 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,27

27. E. Fontana and R. H. Pantell, “Characterization of multilayer rough surfaces by use of surface-plasmon spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 37(7), 3164–3182 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. This will add a small deviation Δk sp from the SP wave vector on smooth metal surface. The Δk sp is the increase in damping resulting from surface roughness. If the surface roughness of the silver film is too large, local hot spots from the uneven surface could degrade image quality. The improvement in surface smoothness can result in improved uniformity in SPCE induced TPEF images.

3.3. Dielectric spacer for protection from water

In order to prevent the damage to the Ag film in aqueous solution, a dielectric spacer can be employed and deposited on the top of the Ag film. In addition to preventing the Ag-water interaction, the dielectric spacer can also reduce the fluorescence quenching effect by the Ag film and hence increase the quantum yield of the fluorescent dyes [7

7. C.-Y. Lin, K.-C. Chiu, C.-Y. Chang, S.-H. Chang, T.-F. Guo, and S.-J. Chen, “Surface plasmon-enhanced and quenched two-photon excited fluorescence,” Opt. Express 18(12), 12807–12817 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. In order to simulate the fluorescence quantum yield in a five-layer structure such as 4/3/2/1/0 (H2O/SiO2/Ag/Ge/BK7), each fluorescent molecule may be regarded as an individual electric dipole. The vibrated characteristic of the dipole moment is modulated by its reflected electric field. The power dissipation is relation to the damping rate of the vibrated dipole and is also the function of the orientation of the dipole. To consider the orientation of the dipole, the two types of the power dissipation can be denoted as the VED and the HED for the five-layer structure, which are perpendicular and parallel to the interface, respectively. They can be expressed as [7

7. C.-Y. Lin, K.-C. Chiu, C.-Y. Chang, S.-H. Chang, T.-F. Guo, and S.-J. Chen, “Surface plasmon-enhanced and quenched two-photon excited fluorescence,” Opt. Express 18(12), 12807–12817 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,30

30. K. G. Sullivan and D. G. Hall, “Enhancement and inhibition of electromagnetic radiation in plane-layered media. I. Plane-wave spectrum approach to modeling classical effects,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 14(5), 1149–1159 (1997). [CrossRef]

,31

31. K. G. Sullivan and D. G. Hall, “Enhancement and inhibition of electromagnetic radiation in plane-layered media. II. Enhanced fluorescence in optical waveguide sensors,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 14(5), 1160–1166 (1997). [CrossRef]

]
IVED(u)=32Re(u31u2(1+r43210pej2k4zh)),
(2)
IHED(u)=34Re(u1u2((1u2)(1r43210pej2k4zh) +(1+r43210sej2k4zh))),
(3)
where u is the normalized transverse wave number, rpand rs are the Fresnel reflection amplitude coefficients for the TM mode and the transverse electric (TE) mode h is the distance between the fluorescent dye and the 4/3 (H2O/SiO2) interface, k4z is the vertical component of the wave number in layer 4. From Eqs. (2) & (3), the modified fluorescence quantum yield becomes

Q=01I(u)du/0I(u)du.
(4)

Because the power dissipation is a function for the orientation of the dipole, the modified quantum yield can be separated into QVED and QHED. Therefore, the dissipated power spectrum of the fluorescent dye can be calculated to evaluate the modified quantum yield from the theoretical models. The refractive indices of the aqueous solution, dielectric spacer, Ag film, Ge layer, and BK7 cover slip (H2O/SiO2/Ag/Ge/BK7 as) are 1.3360, 1.4615, 0.1300 + j3.055, 4.5867 + j2.4516, and 1.5205 at the emission wavelength of 515 nm, respectively. The corresponding thicknesses of the Ge layer and Ag film are 2.0 nm and 40.0 nm. Figure 5
Fig. 5 Quantum yield of the fluorescent dyes on the Ag film as a function of the dielectric spacer thickness.
shows the modified quantum yield as a function of thickness of the dielectric spacer. The modified quantum yield of the VED is smaller than that of the HED because the emission intensity of the fluorescent dyes is quenched by the SPs for the VED. Without a spacer, the quenching significantly diminishes the quantum yield in the VED. The fluorescence emission intensity is determined by the enhancement of electric field intensity, fluorescence coupled emission efficiency, and fluorescence quantum yield. Therefore, the dielectric spacer thickness was designed to be 20 nm to achieve a maximum SPCE TPEF enhancement. Furthermore, the Ag film in aqueous solution, when protected by a 20 nm SiO2 spacer, sustains no damage by the femtosecond laser with a 780 nm wavelength at 30 mW, even for an exposure up to one hour. Uniform white-light images of the SiO2/Ag/Ge film in H2O after long-term exposure by the femtosecond laser at 780 nm and 30 mW can be observed. The observation provides evidence of the protective function that the dielectric spacer serves. Therefore, the optimal condition of the Ag film deposited on the cover slip in aqueous solution for the SPCE TPEF imaging is achieved by adopting an Ag film with the appropriate thickness of 40 nm, a surface roughness below 1.0 nm via the Ge seed layer, and a 20 nm SiO2 protection spacer.

Figure 7(a)
Fig. 7 SPCE TPEF images of a fluorescent bead pattern at (a) the Ag surface and (b) the BFP of the objective.
shows the SPCE TPEF image of a fluorescent bead pattern on the SiO2/Ag/Ge cover slip. The fluorescent beads with a diameter of 1.0 μm are carboxylate-modified yellow-green polystyrene beads (F8888, Molecular Probes). The emission spectrum of the fluorescent bead is from 500 to 600 nm, with an emission peak at 515 nm. The pattern resulted from some beads in aqueous solution falling on the cover slip. The emission intensities of the patterned fluorescent beads were non-uniform and this effect is most likely due to different electric field enhancements and fluorescence coupling efficiency resulting from the different distances of the fluorescent beads from the SiO2 film surface. According to theoretical analysis, the local electric field decays exponentially with the distance from the SiO2 surface. Figure 7(b) shows the SPCE TPEF image of the fluorescent bead pattern at the BFP of the objective. Figure 7(b) also shows an imperfectly circle. The intensity of the SPCE circle is influenced by the shape of the fluorescent structure, the illuminated position, and the polarization of the incident laser spot [21

21. D. G. Zhang, X.-C. Yuan, and A. Bouhelier, “Direct image of surface-plasmon-coupled emission by leakage radiation microscopy,” Appl. Opt. 49(5), 875–879 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,22

22. D. G. Zhang, X.-C. Yuan, A. Bouhelier, P. Wang, and H. Ming, “Excitation of surface plasmon polaritons guided mode by Rhodamine B molecules doped in a PMMA stripe,” Opt. Lett. 35(3), 408–410 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,32

32. D. G. Zhang, K. J. Moh, and X.-C. Yuan, “Surface plasmon-coupled emission from shaped PMMA films doped with fluorescence molecules,” Opt. Express 18(12), 12185–12190 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The equivalent refractive indices resulted from the different distances of the polystyrene fluorescent beads from the SiO2 surface and are slightly varied, and hence induce different SPCE angles. In our experiment, the illuminated area of the quasi-collimating laser beam is filled with the fluorescent beads at different distances. As a result, the SPCE induced TPEF image in the BFP from can be complex.

4. Conclusions

This study has developed an optimizing configuration of an Ag film on a cover slip for SPCE TPEF imaging under aqueous solution. The thickness of the Ag film is designed to be 40 nm and can provide high local electric field enhancement and fluorescence coupled emission efficiency via the SP excitation induced fluorescence excitation. The deposited Ag film with a 2.0 nm Ge seed layer, fabricated by utilizing the RF sputtering process, exhibits a surface roughness below 1.0 nm for improved SPR performance and image quality. Moreover, the Ag film with a 20 nm SiO2 spacer not only avoids damage caused by the Ag-water interaction under high laser power irradiance, but also reduces the fluorescence quenching effect by the Ag film. Based on the SiO2/Ag/Ge configuration, effective TIR TPEF imaging can be achieved through SPCE.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Program for Genomic Medicine (NRPGM) of the National Science Council (NSC) in Taiwan (NSC 97-3112-B-006-013) and NSC 97-3111-B-006-004.

References and links

1.

K. Tawa and W. Knoll, “Mismatching base-pair dependence of the kinetics of DNA-DNA hybridization studied by surface plasmon fluorescence spectroscopy,” Nucleic Acids Res. 32(8), 2372–2377 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2.

F. Yu, B. Persson, S. Löfås, and W. Knoll, “Surface plasmon fluorescence immunoassay of free prostate-specific antigen in human plasma at the femtomolar level,” Anal. Chem. 76(22), 6765–6770 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3.

E. Matveeva, Z. Gryczynski, J. Malicka, I. Gryczynski, and J. R. Lakowicz, “Metal-enhanced fluorescence immunoassays using total internal reflection and silver island-coated surfaces,” Anal. Biochem. 334(2), 303–311 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4.

O. Stranik, H. M. McEvoy, C. McDonagh, and B. D. MacCraith, “Plasmonic enhancement of fluorescence for sensor applications,” Sens. Actuators B Chem. 107(1), 148–153 (2005). [CrossRef]

5.

H. Raether, Surface Plasmons on Smooth and Rough Surfaces and on Gratings (Springer, 1998).

6.

B. Huang, F. Yu, and R. N. Zare, “Surface plasmon resonance imaging using a high numerical aperture microscope objective,” Anal. Chem. 79(7), 2979–2983 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7.

C.-Y. Lin, K.-C. Chiu, C.-Y. Chang, S.-H. Chang, T.-F. Guo, and S.-J. Chen, “Surface plasmon-enhanced and quenched two-photon excited fluorescence,” Opt. Express 18(12), 12807–12817 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8.

V. Kapaklis, P. Poulopoulos, V. Karoutsos, T. Manouras, and C. Politis, “Growth of thin Ag films produced by radio frequency magnetron sputtering,” Thin Solid Films 510(1-2), 138–142 (2006). [CrossRef]

9.

L. Yin, V. K. Vlasko-Vlasov, J. Pearson, J. M. Hiller, J. Hua, U. Welp, D. E. Brown, and C. W. Kimball, “Subwavelength focusing and guiding of surface plasmons,” Nano Lett. 5(7), 1399–1402 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

10.

H.-K. Yuan, U. K. Chettiar, W. Cai, A. V. Kildishev, A. Boltasseva, V. P. Drachev, and V. M. Shalaev, “A negative permeability material at red light,” Opt. Express 15(3), 1076–1083 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

11.

Y. Chi, E. Lay, T.-Y. Chou, Y.-H. Song, and A. J. Carty, “Deposition of silver thin films using the pyrazolate complex [Ag(3,5-(CF3)2C3HN2)]3,” Chem. Vap. Deposition 11(4), 206–212 (2005). [CrossRef]

12.

N. P. Kobayashi, M. S. Islam, W. Wu, P. Chaturvedi, N. X. Fang, S. Y. Wang, and R. S. Williams, “Ultrasmooth silver thin films deposited with a germanium nucleation layer,” Nano Lett. 9(1), 178–182 (2009). [CrossRef]

13.

H. Liu, B. Wang, E. S. P. Leong, P. Yang, Y. Zong, G. Si, J. Teng, and S. A. Maier, “Enhanced surface plasmon resonance on a smooth silver film with a seed growth layer,” ACS Nano 4(6), 3139–3146 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14.

A. Kolomenski, A. Kolomenskii, J. Noel, S. Peng, and H. Schuessler, “Propagation length of surface plasmons in a metal film with roughness,” Appl. Opt. 48(30), 5683–5691 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15.

C. D. Geddes, A. Parfenov, D. Roll, M. J. Uddin, and J. R. Lakowicz, “Fluorescence Spectral Properties of Indocyanine Green on a Roughened Platinum Electrode: Metal-Enhanced Fluorescence,” J. Fluoresc. 13(6), 453–457 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16.

J. R. Lakowicz, “Radiative decay engineering: biophysical and biomedical applications,” Anal. Biochem. 298(1), 1–24 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

17.

R.-Y. He, Y.-D. Su, K.-C. Cho, C.-Y. Lin, N.-S. Chang, C.-H. Chang, and S.-J. Chen, “Surface plasmon-enhanced two-photon fluorescence microscopy for live cell membrane imaging,” Opt. Express 17(8), 5987–5997 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

18.

M. Trnavsky, J. Enderlein, T. Ruckstuhl, C. McDonagh, and B. D. MacCraith, “Experimental and theoretical evaluation of surface plasmon-coupled emission for sensitive fluorescence detection,” J. Biomed. Opt. 13(5), 054021 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

19.

I. Gryczynski, J. Malicka, J. R. Lakowicz, E. M. Goldys, N. Calander, and Z. Gryczynski, “Directional two-photon induced surface plasmon-coupled emission,” Thin Solid Films 491(1-2), 173–176 (2005). [CrossRef]

20.

K. Ray, M. H. Chowdhury, and J. R. Lakowicz, “Observation of surface plasmon-coupled emission using thin platinum films,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 465(1-3), 92–95 (2008). [CrossRef]

21.

D. G. Zhang, X.-C. Yuan, and A. Bouhelier, “Direct image of surface-plasmon-coupled emission by leakage radiation microscopy,” Appl. Opt. 49(5), 875–879 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

22.

D. G. Zhang, X.-C. Yuan, A. Bouhelier, P. Wang, and H. Ming, “Excitation of surface plasmon polaritons guided mode by Rhodamine B molecules doped in a PMMA stripe,” Opt. Lett. 35(3), 408–410 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

23.

W. T. Tang, E. Chung, Y.-H. Kim, P. T. C. So, and C. J. R. Sheppard, “Surface-plasmon-coupled emission microscopy with a spiral phase plate,” Opt. Lett. 35(4), 517–519 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

24.

E. D. Palik, Handbook of Optical Constant of Solids (Academic, 1985).

25.

H. Benisty, R. Stanley, and M. Mayer, “Method of source terms for dipole emission modification in modes of arbitrary planar structures,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15(5), 1192–1201 (1998). [CrossRef]

26.

H. Benisty, H. De Neve, and C. Weisbuch, “Impact of planar microcavity effects on light extraction-Part I: Basic concepts and analytical trends,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 34(9), 1612–1631 (1998). [CrossRef]

27.

E. Fontana and R. H. Pantell, “Characterization of multilayer rough surfaces by use of surface-plasmon spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 37(7), 3164–3182 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

28.

Y.-D. Su, K.-C. Chiu, N.-S. Chang, H.-L. Wu, and S.-J. Chen, “Study of cell-biosubstrate contacts via surface plasmon polariton phase microscopy,” Opt. Express 18(19), 20125–20135 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

29.

G. Valette, “Silver-water interactions: Part I. Model of the inner layer at the metal/water interface,” J. Electroanal. Chem. 230(1-2), 189–204 (1987). [CrossRef]

30.

K. G. Sullivan and D. G. Hall, “Enhancement and inhibition of electromagnetic radiation in plane-layered media. I. Plane-wave spectrum approach to modeling classical effects,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 14(5), 1149–1159 (1997). [CrossRef]

31.

K. G. Sullivan and D. G. Hall, “Enhancement and inhibition of electromagnetic radiation in plane-layered media. II. Enhanced fluorescence in optical waveguide sensors,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 14(5), 1160–1166 (1997). [CrossRef]

32.

D. G. Zhang, K. J. Moh, and X.-C. Yuan, “Surface plasmon-coupled emission from shaped PMMA films doped with fluorescence molecules,” Opt. Express 18(12), 12185–12190 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

OCIS Codes
(170.2520) Medical optics and biotechnology : Fluorescence microscopy
(240.6680) Optics at surfaces : Surface plasmons
(180.4315) Microscopy : Nonlinear microscopy

ToC Category:
Microscopy

History
Original Manuscript: December 20, 2010
Revised Manuscript: February 18, 2011
Manuscript Accepted: February 24, 2011
Published: March 7, 2011

Virtual Issues
Vol. 6, Iss. 4 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Kuo-Chih Chiu, Chun-Yu Lin, Chen Yuan Dong, and Shean-Jen Chen, "Optimizing silver film for surface plasmon-coupled emission induced two-photon excited fluorescence imaging," Opt. Express 19, 5386-5396 (2011)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/vjbo/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-19-6-5386


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. K. Tawa and W. Knoll, “Mismatching base-pair dependence of the kinetics of DNA-DNA hybridization studied by surface plasmon fluorescence spectroscopy,” Nucleic Acids Res. 32(8), 2372–2377 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. F. Yu, B. Persson, S. Löfås, and W. Knoll, “Surface plasmon fluorescence immunoassay of free prostate-specific antigen in human plasma at the femtomolar level,” Anal. Chem. 76(22), 6765–6770 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. E. Matveeva, Z. Gryczynski, J. Malicka, I. Gryczynski, and J. R. Lakowicz, “Metal-enhanced fluorescence immunoassays using total internal reflection and silver island-coated surfaces,” Anal. Biochem. 334(2), 303–311 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. O. Stranik, H. M. McEvoy, C. McDonagh, and B. D. MacCraith, “Plasmonic enhancement of fluorescence for sensor applications,” Sens. Actuators B Chem. 107(1), 148–153 (2005). [CrossRef]
  5. H. Raether, Surface Plasmons on Smooth and Rough Surfaces and on Gratings (Springer, 1998).
  6. B. Huang, F. Yu, and R. N. Zare, “Surface plasmon resonance imaging using a high numerical aperture microscope objective,” Anal. Chem. 79(7), 2979–2983 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. C.-Y. Lin, K.-C. Chiu, C.-Y. Chang, S.-H. Chang, T.-F. Guo, and S.-J. Chen, “Surface plasmon-enhanced and quenched two-photon excited fluorescence,” Opt. Express 18(12), 12807–12817 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. V. Kapaklis, P. Poulopoulos, V. Karoutsos, T. Manouras, and C. Politis, “Growth of thin Ag films produced by radio frequency magnetron sputtering,” Thin Solid Films 510(1-2), 138–142 (2006). [CrossRef]
  9. L. Yin, V. K. Vlasko-Vlasov, J. Pearson, J. M. Hiller, J. Hua, U. Welp, D. E. Brown, and C. W. Kimball, “Subwavelength focusing and guiding of surface plasmons,” Nano Lett. 5(7), 1399–1402 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. H.-K. Yuan, U. K. Chettiar, W. Cai, A. V. Kildishev, A. Boltasseva, V. P. Drachev, and V. M. Shalaev, “A negative permeability material at red light,” Opt. Express 15(3), 1076–1083 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Y. Chi, E. Lay, T.-Y. Chou, Y.-H. Song, and A. J. Carty, “Deposition of silver thin films using the pyrazolate complex [Ag(3,5-(CF3)2C3HN2)]3,” Chem. Vap. Deposition 11(4), 206–212 (2005). [CrossRef]
  12. N. P. Kobayashi, M. S. Islam, W. Wu, P. Chaturvedi, N. X. Fang, S. Y. Wang, and R. S. Williams, “Ultrasmooth silver thin films deposited with a germanium nucleation layer,” Nano Lett. 9(1), 178–182 (2009). [CrossRef]
  13. H. Liu, B. Wang, E. S. P. Leong, P. Yang, Y. Zong, G. Si, J. Teng, and S. A. Maier, “Enhanced surface plasmon resonance on a smooth silver film with a seed growth layer,” ACS Nano 4(6), 3139–3146 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. A. Kolomenski, A. Kolomenskii, J. Noel, S. Peng, and H. Schuessler, “Propagation length of surface plasmons in a metal film with roughness,” Appl. Opt. 48(30), 5683–5691 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. C. D. Geddes, A. Parfenov, D. Roll, M. J. Uddin, and J. R. Lakowicz, “Fluorescence Spectral Properties of Indocyanine Green on a Roughened Platinum Electrode: Metal-Enhanced Fluorescence,” J. Fluoresc. 13(6), 453–457 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. J. R. Lakowicz, “Radiative decay engineering: biophysical and biomedical applications,” Anal. Biochem. 298(1), 1–24 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. R.-Y. He, Y.-D. Su, K.-C. Cho, C.-Y. Lin, N.-S. Chang, C.-H. Chang, and S.-J. Chen, “Surface plasmon-enhanced two-photon fluorescence microscopy for live cell membrane imaging,” Opt. Express 17(8), 5987–5997 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. M. Trnavsky, J. Enderlein, T. Ruckstuhl, C. McDonagh, and B. D. MacCraith, “Experimental and theoretical evaluation of surface plasmon-coupled emission for sensitive fluorescence detection,” J. Biomed. Opt. 13(5), 054021 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. I. Gryczynski, J. Malicka, J. R. Lakowicz, E. M. Goldys, N. Calander, and Z. Gryczynski, “Directional two-photon induced surface plasmon-coupled emission,” Thin Solid Films 491(1-2), 173–176 (2005). [CrossRef]
  20. K. Ray, M. H. Chowdhury, and J. R. Lakowicz, “Observation of surface plasmon-coupled emission using thin platinum films,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 465(1-3), 92–95 (2008). [CrossRef]
  21. D. G. Zhang, X.-C. Yuan, and A. Bouhelier, “Direct image of surface-plasmon-coupled emission by leakage radiation microscopy,” Appl. Opt. 49(5), 875–879 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. D. G. Zhang, X.-C. Yuan, A. Bouhelier, P. Wang, and H. Ming, “Excitation of surface plasmon polaritons guided mode by Rhodamine B molecules doped in a PMMA stripe,” Opt. Lett. 35(3), 408–410 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. W. T. Tang, E. Chung, Y.-H. Kim, P. T. C. So, and C. J. R. Sheppard, “Surface-plasmon-coupled emission microscopy with a spiral phase plate,” Opt. Lett. 35(4), 517–519 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. E. D. Palik, Handbook of Optical Constant of Solids (Academic, 1985).
  25. H. Benisty, R. Stanley, and M. Mayer, “Method of source terms for dipole emission modification in modes of arbitrary planar structures,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15(5), 1192–1201 (1998). [CrossRef]
  26. H. Benisty, H. De Neve, and C. Weisbuch, “Impact of planar microcavity effects on light extraction-Part I: Basic concepts and analytical trends,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 34(9), 1612–1631 (1998). [CrossRef]
  27. E. Fontana and R. H. Pantell, “Characterization of multilayer rough surfaces by use of surface-plasmon spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 37(7), 3164–3182 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Y.-D. Su, K.-C. Chiu, N.-S. Chang, H.-L. Wu, and S.-J. Chen, “Study of cell-biosubstrate contacts via surface plasmon polariton phase microscopy,” Opt. Express 18(19), 20125–20135 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. G. Valette, “Silver-water interactions: Part I. Model of the inner layer at the metal/water interface,” J. Electroanal. Chem. 230(1-2), 189–204 (1987). [CrossRef]
  30. K. G. Sullivan and D. G. Hall, “Enhancement and inhibition of electromagnetic radiation in plane-layered media. I. Plane-wave spectrum approach to modeling classical effects,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 14(5), 1149–1159 (1997). [CrossRef]
  31. K. G. Sullivan and D. G. Hall, “Enhancement and inhibition of electromagnetic radiation in plane-layered media. II. Enhanced fluorescence in optical waveguide sensors,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 14(5), 1160–1166 (1997). [CrossRef]
  32. D. G. Zhang, K. J. Moh, and X.-C. Yuan, “Surface plasmon-coupled emission from shaped PMMA films doped with fluorescence molecules,” Opt. Express 18(12), 12185–12190 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited