Non-exponential decay of dark localized surface plasmons

doi:10.1364/OE.20.006720

« Show journal navigation

Non-exponential decay of dark localized surface plasmons

Pavel Ginzburg and Anatoly V. Zayats »View Author Affiliations

Optics Express, Vol. 20, Issue 6, pp. 6720-6727 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.006720

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1346 KB)

Journal Search
Article Lookup

Article Tools

Citations

Alert me when this article is cited
Export Citation/Save

Article Navigation

▸ Article Outline
– Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Exponential versus non-exponential decay laws
3. Theoretical model of the non-exponential decay law
4. Discussion
5. Conclusion
– References and links

Article Tools
Full Text
Article Info
References
Cited By
Figures
Metrics
Download PDF

Viewing Equations in the
HTML Article

Optimal Viewing Recommendations

Full Text
Article Info
References (47)
Cited By
Figures (3)
Metrics

Abstract

It is shown that the decay of the weakly coupled to radiation (dark) modes of subwavelength plasmonic nanostructures is strongly nonexponential. Their lifetime is overestimated by conventional exponential relaxation time obtained in the standard Markovian approximation. These effects are manifestations of the strong dispersion and near-field feedback. The developed theoretical framework introduces an ensemble of local relaxation degrees of freedom coupled to plasmonic mode in order to describe its decay due to material losses. The macroscopic description of the decay process leads to the specific memory function of the system, evaluated from the modal and material dispersions of the plasmonic nanostructure. Proper knowledge of the relaxation behavior is vital for various applications relying on light-matter interactions of emitters with nanoscale objects, such as fluorescence manipulation, bio-imaging, sensing, spasers, sub-diffraction optics, Raman scattering, and quantum optics.

1. Introduction

Electromagnetic cavities are extensively used for manipulation of light-matter interactions since the original work of Purcell [1

E. M. Purcell, “Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies,” Phys. Rev. 69, 681 (1946).

], where the environment was shown to provide significant modification of spontaneous emission rates at radio frequencies. In the optical range, various systems, such as photonic crystals [2

P. Lodahl, A. Floris Van Driel, I. S. Nikolaev, A. Irman, K. Overgaag, D. Vanmaekelbergh, and W. L. Vos, “Controlling the dynamics of spontaneous emission from quantum dots by photonic crystals,” Nature 430(7000), 654–657 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], pillars [3

J. M. Gérard, D. Barrier, J. Y. Marzin, R. Kuszelewicz, L. Manin, E. Costard, V. Thierry‐Mieg, and T. Rivera, “Quantum boxes as active probes for photonic microstructures: the pillar microcavity case,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 69(4), 449–451 (1996). [CrossRef]

], toroidal microcavities [4

D. K. Armani, T. J. Kippenberg, S. M. Spillane, and K. J. Vahala, “Ultra-high-Q toroid microcavity on a chip,” Nature 421(6926), 925–928 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], metal nano-particles [5

L. A. Blanco and F. J. García de Abajo, “Spontaneous light emission in complex nanostructures,” Phys. Rev. B 69(20), 205414 (2004). [CrossRef]

], and metamaterials [6

Z. Jacob, I. Smolyaninov, and E. Narimanov, “Broadband Purcell effect: radiative decay engineering with metamaterials,” e-print arXiv:0910.3981.

–9

A. N. Poddubny, P. A. Belov, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Spontaneous radiation of a finite-size dipole emitter in hyperbolic media,” Phys. Rev. A 84(2), 023807 (2011). [CrossRef]

] are used for different applications, where manipulation of light emission is required. The recent progress in both fabrication and modeling enabled design of metallic nanometric cavities with precisely controlled optical properties, opening new prospects for interesting practical applications, including sensing [10

A. Alù and N. Engheta, “Cloaking a sensor,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102(23), 233901 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 11

A. V. Kabashin, P. Evans, S. Pastkovsky, W. Hendren, G. A. Wurtz, R. Atkinson, R. Pollard, V. A. Podolskiy, and A. V. Zayats, “Plasmonic nanorod metamaterials for biosensing,” Nat. Mater. 8(11), 867–871 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], optical trapping [12

M. L. Juan, M. Righini, and R. Quidant, “Plasmon nano-optical tweezers,” Nat. Photonics 5(6), 349–356 (2011). [CrossRef]

], cancer imaging and therapy [13

C. Loo, A. Lowery, N. Halas, J. West, and R. Drezek, “Immunotargeted nanoshells for integrated cancer imaging and therapy,” Nano Lett. 5(4), 709–711 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], plasmonic lasers [14

R. F. Oulton, V. J. Sorger, T. Zentgraf, R. M. Ma, C. Gladden, L. Dai, G. Bartal, and X. Zhang, “Plasmon lasers at deep subwavelength scale,” Nature 461(7264), 629–632 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

–16

M. P. Nezhad, A. Simic, O. Bondarenko, B. Slutsky, A. Mizrahi, L. Feng, V. Lomakin, and Y. Fainman, “Room-temperature subwavelength metallo-dielectric lasers,” Nat. Photonics 4(6), 395–399 (2010). [CrossRef]

], spasers [17

M. I. Stockman, “The spaser as a nanoscale quantum generator and ultrafast amplifier,” J. Opt. 12(2), 024004 (2010). [CrossRef]

] and other active plasmonic components [18

J. K. Kitur, V. A. Podolskiy, and M. A. Noginov, “Stimulated emission of surface plasmon polaritons in a microcylinder cavity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106(18), 183903 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], enhanced nonlinearities [19

I. I. Smolyaninov, C. H. Lee, and C. C. Davis, “Giant enhancement of surface second harmonic generation in BaTiO3 due to photorefractive surface wave excitation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83(12), 2429–2432 (1999). [CrossRef]

–21

P. Ginzburg, A. Hayat, N. Berkovitch, and M. Orenstein, “Nonlocal ponderomotive nonlinearity in plasmonics,” Opt. Lett. 35(10), 1551–1553 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], control of emission properties [22

J. B. Khurgin, G. Sun, and R. A. Soref, “Enhancement of luminescence efficiency using surface plasmon polaritons: figures of merit,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 24(8), 1968–1980 (2007). [CrossRef]

], transformation optics [23

A. V. Kildishev, W. Cai, U. K. Chettiar, and V. M. Shalaev, “Transformation optics: approaching broadband electromagnetic cloaking,” New J. Phys. 10(11), 115029 (2008). [CrossRef]

], and many others.

Metal nanoparticles, having negative permittivity at certain frequencies, can support excitations, called localized surface plasmon resonances, even if structures are of subwavelength dimensions [24

S. A. Maier, Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications, New York, Springer, 2007.

]. The eigenmodes of nanostructures may be estimated using different tools, such as hybridization method [25

E. Prodan, C. Radloff, N. J. Halas, and P. Nordlander, “A hybridization model for the plasmon response of complex nanostructures,” Science 302(5644), 419–422 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], surface integrals [26

I. D. Mayergoyz, D. R. Fredkin, and Z. Zhang, “Electrostatic (plasmon) resonances in nanoparticles,” Phys. Rev. B 72(15), 155412 (2005). [CrossRef]

] or other numerical techniques. The eigen frequencies (resonances) may be tuned using particle-particle coupling [27

P. Nordlander, C. Oubre, E. Prodan, K. Li, and M. Stockman, “Plasmon hybridization in nanoparticle dimers,” Nano Lett. 4(5), 899–903 (2004). [CrossRef]

], particle elongation [28

B. N. Khlebtsov and N. G. Khlebtsov, “Multipole plasmons in metal nanorods: scaling properties and dependence on particle size, shape, orientation, and dielectric environment,” J. Phys. Chem. C 111(31), 11516–11527 (2007). [CrossRef]

], concavity tuning [29

N. Berkovitch, P. Ginzburg, and M. Orenstein, “Concave plasmonic particles: broad-band geometrical tunability in the near-infrared,” Nano Lett. 10(4), 1405–1408 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], and ultimately by evolutionary methods [30

P. Ginzburg, N. Berkovitch, A. Nevet, I. Shor, and M. Orenstein, “Resonances on-demand for plasmonic nano-particles,” Nano Lett. 11(6), 2329–2333 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], providing possibility to achieve on-demand spectrum of resonance modes. Here we distinguish between bright modes of plasmonic nanoparticles with strong dipolar moment, hence efficiently radiating, and higher-order dark modes, weakly or not at all radiating into the far-field. While bright plasmonic modes may be used for the enhancement of radiation efficiency of emitters, using the so-called optical antenna configurations, dark modes have been proposed for trapping of light signals and for guiding along chains of particles with suppressed far-field losses [31

A. Alù and N. Engheta, “Guided propagation along quadrupolar chains of plasmonic nanoparticles,” Phys. Rev. B 79(23), 235412 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. Dark modes, not being coupled to the far-field radiation, can be excited only in the near-field by closely situated emitters [32

M. Liu, T. W. Lee, S. K. Gray, P. Guyot-Sionnest, and M. Pelton, “Excitation of dark plasmons in metal nanoparticles by a localized emitter,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102(10), 107401 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] or directly using electron beam impact [33

M. W. Chu, V. Myroshnychenko, C. H. Chen, J. P. Deng, C. Y. Mou, and F. J. García de Abajo, “Probing bright and dark surface-plasmon modes in individual and coupled noble metal nanoparticles using an electron beam,” Nano Lett. 9(1), 399–404 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

The knowledge of the relaxation behavior of plasmonic dark modes is of potential interest for both fundamental understanding of the process as well as for various above discussed applications, where lifetime estimations may limit or improve predictions on possible performances. To the best of our knowledge, the decay law of the dark mode decay is generally assumed to be exponential [34

I. D. Mayergoyz, Z. Zhang, and G. Miano, “Analysis of dynamics of excitation and dephasing of plasmon resonance modes in nanoparticles,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98(14), 147401 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] and, in theory, determined by material losses if the far-filed radiation is neglected. However, any physical system with an energy spectrum, bounded from below, could not decay to its ground state obeying exponential law [35

L. Fonda, G. C. Ghirardi, and A. Rimini, “Decay theory of unstable quantum systems,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 41(4), 587–631 (1978). [CrossRef]

], and localized surface plasmons, having discrete and bound spectrum, are not uncommon. The exponential decay law of a physical system relies on the assumption (also called the Markov approximation) that the system has no memory and its next state is only depends on the present and not on the past. The deviations from exponential laws were studied mostly for decays of quantum systems, such as hydrogen and more generally two-level atoms [36

J. Seke and W. N. Herfort, “Deviations from exponential decay in the case of spontaneous emission from a two-level atom,” Phys. Rev. A 38(2), 833–840 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 37

C. Cao, J. Tian, and H. Cao, “Non-Markovian correlation function and direct analysis of spontaneous emission of an excited two-level atom,” Phys. Lett. A 303(5-6), 318–327 (2002). [CrossRef]

Here we develop a theoretical framework to account for memory effects in plasmonic dark mode decay. We show that the steep dispersion of the nano-cavity eigenmodes together with strong near-field feedback lead to considerable deviations from generally assumed conventional exponential decay law with up to 40% changes in the relaxation time.

2. Exponential versus non-exponential decay laws

The relaxation time of an open cavity is determined by a competition between the far-field radiative losses and the material losses in its components. While dipolar (‘bright’) plasmonic resonances predominantly decay by coupling to the far-field radiation (apart from very small particles), the lifetime of higher-order dark modes, e.g., quadrupole mode with the field distribution for a spherical nanoparticle shown in Fig. 1 , is determined by material losses. The decay rate of a dark cavity mode can be written in general case as [38

J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (Wiley, New York, 1999), 3rd ed.

–41

E. Feigenbaum and M. Orenstein, “Ultrasmall volume plasmons, yet with complete retardation effects,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101(16), 163902 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]

Γ_{C} = 2 ω_{0} \frac{\int d V ε_{0} ε_{i m} {| \vec{E} (\vec{r}, ω_{0}) |}^{2}}{U_{t o t}},

(1)

where

ω_{0}

is the resonant frequency,

\vec{E} (\vec{r}, ω_{0})

is the associated electric field,

U_{t o t}

is the total energy in the cavity,

ε_{0}

is the vacuum permittivity, and

ε = ε_{r} + i ε_{i m}

is the complex, frequency dependent relative permittivity. The intensity decay coefficient

Γ_{C}

for the quadrupole resonance of a plasmonic sphere can be analytically calculated in the quasistatic approximation to be

Γ_{C} = \frac{41 ω_{p}^{2} γ ω_{0}^{2}}{{(ω_{0}^{2} + γ^{2})}^{2} \cdot [\frac{41}{2} (1 - \frac{ω_{p}^{2}}{(ω_{0}^{2} + γ^{2})} + \frac{2 ω_{p}^{2} ω_{0}^{2}}{{(ω_{0}^{2} + γ^{2})}^{2}}) + \frac{189}{8} ε_{d}]},

(2)

where

ω_{p}^{}

is the plasma frequency of conduction band electrons,

γ

is the electron collision rate determining the material (Ohmic) losses,

ε_{d}

is the permittivity of the embedding medium, and the Drude model for the metal permittivity was used with

ε = 1 - \frac{ω_{p}^{2}}{ω (ω + i γ)}

. These analytical expressions for the both decay rate and the material dispersion are used here for convenience, while any other numerically or experimentally evaluated data may be employed as well. The conventional decay rate (Eqs. (1, 2 corresponds to the exponential time dependence of the intensity:

I (t) = I (0) \exp (- Γ_{C} t)

, if the mode is not overdamped. However, this description neglects the memory effects of the system, originating from the steep modal and material dispersion near the resonant frequency and, as will be shown below, significantly overestimates the lifetime of plasmonic dark modes.

Fig. 1 The electric field distribution associated with a quadrupolar mode of a spherical nanoparticle in the quasistatic approximation. Color maps of (a) radial and (b) azimuthal electric field components. The quadrupole resonance condition is ε(ω) = - 1.5ε_d . All distances are normalized to the sphere radius. Color scale represents the electric field amplitude in arbitrary units. Inset in (a) illustrates the assembly of local oscillators acting as the damping reservoir; q_k^†,q_k are the creation and annihilation operators corresponding to k^th oscillator.

3. Theoretical model of the non-exponential decay law

In the presented model, the memory function is introduced by the cavity mode coupling to the ensemble of local oscillators (inset in Fig. 1(a)), accounting for the material losses. In this treatment, the spatial shape of the cavity mode is evaluated by solving classical Maxwell’s equations for lossless case, and the overall stored energy is calculated by the Brillouin formula [40

R. Loudon, “The propagation of electromagnetic energy through an absorbing dielectric,” J. Phys. A 3(3), 233–245 (1970). [CrossRef]

, 41

E. Feigenbaum and M. Orenstein, “Ultrasmall volume plasmons, yet with complete retardation effects,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101(16), 163902 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], taking into account the dispersion of the real part of a material permittivity. This approach is known in quantum mechanical quantization schemes as ‘modes-of-the-universe’ or ‘mode decomposition’ approach and, in principle, may simultaneously include losses and dispersion by introducing an ensemble of local oscillators ([42

N. A. R. Bhat and J. E. Sipe, “Hamiltonian treatment of the electromagnetic field in dispersive and absorptive structured media,” Phys. Rev. A 73(6), 063808 (2006). [CrossRef]

] and references therein). Here, we separate the loss channel from the dispersion behavior of the real part of the permittivity, maintaining the Kramers–Kronig relation between them. This approach provides direct access to the loss channels without extra need to treat an additional coupling with the real part of the dispersion and solve complex equations for polariton modes of the system. In our model, the particle is divided into a set of infinitesimal volumes, each one contains the absorption degree of freedom represented by a local oscillator. The infinite ensemble of such oscillators will act as the reservoir, which is treated within the Heisnberg-Langevin approach for quantum theory of decay [43

M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cambridge 1997).

]. The Hamiltonian of the system, separated into the energy of the free field and the reservoir modes, and the field-reservoir interaction part, is given by

\begin{array}{l} \hat{Η} = {\hat{Η}}_{0} + {\hat{Η}}_{I} \\ {\hat{Η}}_{0} = ℏ ω_{0} a^{†} a + \sum_{q} ℏ ω_{k} q_{k}^{†} q_{k}; {\hat{Η}}_{I} = ℏ \sum_{k} g_{k} (q_{k}^{†} a + a^{†} q_{k}), \end{array}

(3)

where

a^{†} (a)

and

q_{k}^{†} (q_{k})

are the creation (annihilation) operators of the cavity and reservoir modes, respectively, and

g_{k}

is the constant describing the coupling between the field and the reservoir. The formal solution of the equation of motion for the operators, averaged over the reservoir modes (

{〈 ... 〉}_{R}

), is given by the following integral equation:

\begin{array}{l} \tilde{a} (t) = {〈 a (t) 〉}_{R} e^{i ω_{0} t} \\ \dot{\tilde{a}} = - \sum_{k} (g_{k}^{2} \cdot \int_{0}^{t} d t' \tilde{a} (t') e^{i (ω_{0} - ω_{k}) (t - t')}) . \end{array}

(4)

The conventional decay rate corresponds to the solution of Eq. (4) under the Markovian and Weisskopf-Wigner [43

M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cambridge 1997).

] approximation (memory-less exponential process). It may be shown also, that

g_{k}^{}^{2}

ε_{i m}

. Thus, the final equation for the time evolution of the field amplitude which takes into account the memory effects is given by

\dot{\tilde{a}} = - \int_{0}^{t} F (t - τ) \tilde{a} (τ) d τ,

(5)

where

F (t) = \frac{Γ_{C}}{2 π} \int_{0}^{\infty} (\frac{ω_{0}^{2} + γ^{2}}{ω^{2} + γ^{2}}) \cdot \frac{ω_{0}}{ω} e^{i (ω_{0} - ω) t} d ω .

(6)

The memory function

F (t)

is responsible for the time evolution of the field operators. It should be noted, that neither derivations above nor the subsequent analytical solution are relying on the slow variation in time approximation of

\tilde{a} (t)

in Eq. (4), employed in the Weisskopf-Wigner approach.

The solution of Eqs. (5) and 6 may be written in the close integral form using the Laplace transformation and the convolution property:

a (t) = \frac{1}{2 π} \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \frac{a (0)}{i s + \frac{Γ_{C}}{2} (\frac{ω_{0}^{2} + γ^{2}}{{(ω_{0} - s)}^{2} + γ^{2}}) \cdot \frac{ω_{0}}{(ω_{0} - s)}} e^{i s t} d s .

(7)

The asymptotic behavior of the solution can be found by approximating the zero-order of the integrand by Lorenzian function. This will result in an exponential decay law. However, the higher-order contributions of the denominator’s Taylor expansion are adding the oscillatory factor to the exponential decay.

4. Discussion

Assuming macroscopic number of cavity photons, quantum operators may be replaced by classical amplitudes. Figure 2 (a) shows the time evolution of the mode power for two different material loss parameters. In both cases

ε_{r} = - 1.5

was used, corresponding to the quadrupole resonance of the sphere (~350 nm wavelength for Ag) and material losses were varied with

ε_{i m} = 0.5

and

ε_{i m} = 0.1

. As was mentioned above, plasmonic resonances may be tuned by various techniques, and the desired dark modes may be shifted into the infrared part of the spectrum, where relative material losses are smaller. The numerical results (Eq. (7) deviate from the conventional theory. In both cases, nonexponetinal decay has been observed, as was qualitatively predicted in the discussion after Eq. (7). The deviations are more pronounced with the increasing Ohmic losses. For large losses, the lifetime of the dark mode is overestimated by the conventional model by about 40%. To emphasize the deviation from the exponential law, we plotted the log-scale ratio of the numerical result and the exponential law: on this graph the horizontal line y = 0 represents correspondence with the conventional theory (Fig. 2 (b)). As can be seen, pronounced oscillatory behavior is present, manifesting that the decay is not purely exponential.

Fig. 2 (a) The time evolution of the plasmonic quadrupole mode’s power for different loss parameters in the quasistatic regime. Blue (red) and green (black) lines correspond to the memory-effect-based model (conventional exponential decay) for

ε = - 1.5 + 0.5 i

and

ε = - 1.5 + 0.1 i

, respectively. (b) Deviation of the decay process from the exponential law [

\log ({| a (t) |}^{2}) - Γ_{C} \cdot t

]: 4 curves correspond to different material loss parameters

ε_{i m} = [0.5; 0.1; 0.05; 0.01]

. Horizontal dashed line y = 0 corresponds to the exponential decay.

Bright plasmonic modes may be treated in the similar fashion, distinguishing between radiative and Ohmic losses. Absorption, scattering and extinction cross-sections of silver spheres (material parameters from [44

P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy, “Optical constants of the noble metals,” Phys. Rev. B 6(12), 4370–4379 (1972). [CrossRef]

]) were evaluated using the Mie theory and are depicted in Fig. 3 (a) . The extinction of the 50 nm radius sphere is dominated by scattering, while for the 20 nm radius the absorption is the main loss channel. For silver spherical nanoparticles with the radius bigger than 30 nm radiation losses can be considered predominant [39

M. I. Stockman, “Nanoplasmonics: past, present, and glimpse into future,” Opt. Express 19(22), 22029–22106 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Fig. 3 (a) Absorption (red), scattering (blue) and extinction (black) cross-sections for the silver particles with the radii of 50 nm (solid lines) and 20 nm (dashed lines) and permittivity from [44

P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy, “Optical constants of the noble metals,” Phys. Rev. B 6(12), 4370–4379 (1972). [CrossRef]

]. (b) The time evolution of the dipolar plasmonic mode’s power: red line corresponds to the standard Weisskopf-Wigner theory; blue line is the full numerical solution using the memory equation. Insert shows the zoomed area of the same curve.

The decay of bright modes still may be described by Eq. (3) with the local oscillators accounting for material losses are replaced by the free-space radiation modes. The coupling constant, resulting from the interaction Hamiltonian

{\hat{Η}}_{I} = - \vec{d} \cdot \vec{E}

, is given by

g_{k}^{2} = \frac{ω_{0}}{2 ℏ ε_{0} V} {| d |}^{2} \cos^{2} θ

[43

M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cambridge 1997).

], here

V

is the quantization volume and

d = \frac{12 π ε_{0} ε_{d} ℏ R^{3}}{\partial Re (ε) / \partial ω_{ω = ω_{0}}}

is the effective plasmonic dipole moment [39

M. I. Stockman, “Nanoplasmonics: past, present, and glimpse into future,” Opt. Express 19(22), 22029–22106 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] with

R

being the sphere radius and

θ

inclination angle in the spherical coordinate system. The equation of motion for the dipolar plasmonic mode annihilation operator (

a_{d}

), similar to Eq. (5), is then

{\dot{a}}_{d} (t) = - \frac{\sqrt{ε_{d}^{3}} R^{3} {(ω_{0}^{2} + γ^{2})}^{2}}{π c^{3} ω_{p}^{2} ω_{0}} \int_{0}^{t} d τ \cdot a_{d} (τ) \int_{0}^{\infty} d ω \cdot ω^{3} e^{i (ω_{0} - ω) (t - τ)}

. In this equation, however, the last integral is undefined, meaning that more complicated integration contours for the Laplace transformation [36

J. Seke and W. N. Herfort, “Deviations from exponential decay in the case of spontaneous emission from a two-level atom,” Phys. Rev. A 38(2), 833–840 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] or step-by-step solution, approximating the derivative by finite differences [37

C. Cao, J. Tian, and H. Cao, “Non-Markovian correlation function and direct analysis of spontaneous emission of an excited two-level atom,” Phys. Lett. A 303(5-6), 318–327 (2002). [CrossRef]

] should be used. We employed the latter method for the treatment of the dipolar mode decay behavior. The results are depicted on Fig. 3(b) showing that the numerical solution (blue line) is very close to the conventional Weisskopf-Wigner approach (red-dashed line) and the memory effects are not significant in radiative decay of bright plasmonic modes.

5. Conclusion

We have developed a theoretical framework to describe the decay of dark plasmonic modes. The introduction of the local degrees of freedom coupled to the plasmonic mode results in the macroscopic description of the process in terms of the memory function, evaluated from the modal and material dispersions and strong near-field feedback. The dark mode decay is strongly nonexponential if the Ohmic losses are strong. The standard exponential decay law has been shown to overestimate the lifetime by up to 40%, suggesting that the proposed model should be considered to obtain realistic estimation of performances of plasmonic devices based on dark modes. The developed formalism may be strictly applied for any open cavity (not necessarily plasmonic) where radiative leakage may be treated in the same way as material losses. In particular, dipolar plasmonic resonances, decaying both radiatively and nonradiatively may be described in the same fashion paying additional attention to the competition between different decay channels. Interestingly, other quantum effects in plasmonics, associated with peculiarities of material responses, have recently been shown to provide unusual metastable states [45

I. I. Smolyaninov, “Quantum fluctuations of the refractive index near the interface between a metal and a nonlinear dielectric,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94(5), 057403 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] and to correct overestimated by standard theory predictions on the near-field enhancements [46

J. Zuloaga, E. Prodan, and P. Nordlander, “Quantum plasmonics: optical properties and tunability of metallic nanorods,” ACS Nano 4(9), 5269–5276 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

The memory effects may also substantially influence the spasing phenomenon. The spasing into the dark modes, yet experimentally demonstrated, is very promising, since it may directly generate strongly confined evanescent modes with almost no leakage in the far-field radiation. The rate equations, conventionally describing the spaser action [17

M. I. Stockman, “The spaser as a nanoscale quantum generator and ultrafast amplifier,” J. Opt. 12(2), 024004 (2010). [CrossRef]

] depends only on the actual time, neglecting the memory effects. The latter effects may lead to interesting and important for spasing action phenomena, similar to the effects of the memory of atoms in laser systems which was shown to reduce the laser linewidth below the usual Schawlow-Townes limit [47

C. Benkert, M. O. Scully, and G. Süssmann, “Memory correlation effects on quantum noise in lasers and masers,” Phys. Rev. A 41(11), 6119–6128 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported in part by EPSRC (UK). P. Ginzburg acknowledges the Royal Society for Newton International Fellowship and Yad Hanadiv for Rothschild Fellowship. The authors are grateful to Michael Shamis for discussions on numerical aspects.

References and links

1.	E. M. Purcell, “Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies,” Phys. Rev. 69, 681 (1946).
2.	P. Lodahl, A. Floris Van Driel, I. S. Nikolaev, A. Irman, K. Overgaag, D. Vanmaekelbergh, and W. L. Vos, “Controlling the dynamics of spontaneous emission from quantum dots by photonic crystals,” Nature 430(7000), 654–657 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3.	J. M. Gérard, D. Barrier, J. Y. Marzin, R. Kuszelewicz, L. Manin, E. Costard, V. Thierry‐Mieg, and T. Rivera, “Quantum boxes as active probes for photonic microstructures: the pillar microcavity case,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 69(4), 449–451 (1996). [CrossRef]
4.	D. K. Armani, T. J. Kippenberg, S. M. Spillane, and K. J. Vahala, “Ultra-high-Q toroid microcavity on a chip,” Nature 421(6926), 925–928 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5.	L. A. Blanco and F. J. García de Abajo, “Spontaneous light emission in complex nanostructures,” Phys. Rev. B 69(20), 205414 (2004). [CrossRef]
6.	Z. Jacob, I. Smolyaninov, and E. Narimanov, “Broadband Purcell effect: radiative decay engineering with metamaterials,” e-print arXiv:0910.3981.
7.	Z. Jacob, J. Kim, G. V. Naik, A. Boltasseva, E. E. Narimanov, and V. M. Shalaev, “Engineering photonic density of states using metamaterials,” Appl. Phys. B 100(1), 215–218 (2010). [CrossRef]
8.	K. Tanaka, E. Plum, J. Y. Ou, T. Uchino, and N. I. Zheludev, “Multifold enhancement of quantum dot luminescence in plasmonic metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105(22), 227403 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9.	A. N. Poddubny, P. A. Belov, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Spontaneous radiation of a finite-size dipole emitter in hyperbolic media,” Phys. Rev. A 84(2), 023807 (2011). [CrossRef]
10.	A. Alù and N. Engheta, “Cloaking a sensor,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102(23), 233901 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11.	A. V. Kabashin, P. Evans, S. Pastkovsky, W. Hendren, G. A. Wurtz, R. Atkinson, R. Pollard, V. A. Podolskiy, and A. V. Zayats, “Plasmonic nanorod metamaterials for biosensing,” Nat. Mater. 8(11), 867–871 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12.	M. L. Juan, M. Righini, and R. Quidant, “Plasmon nano-optical tweezers,” Nat. Photonics 5(6), 349–356 (2011). [CrossRef]
13.	C. Loo, A. Lowery, N. Halas, J. West, and R. Drezek, “Immunotargeted nanoshells for integrated cancer imaging and therapy,” Nano Lett. 5(4), 709–711 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14.	R. F. Oulton, V. J. Sorger, T. Zentgraf, R. M. Ma, C. Gladden, L. Dai, G. Bartal, and X. Zhang, “Plasmon lasers at deep subwavelength scale,” Nature 461(7264), 629–632 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15.	M. T. Hill, Y.-S. Oei, B. Smalbrugge, Y. Zhu, T. de Vries, P. J. van Veldhoven, F. W. M. van Otten, T. J. Eijkemans, J. P. Turkiewicz, H. de Waardt, E. J. Geluk, S.-H. Kwon, Y.-H. Lee, R. Nötzel, and M. K. Smit, “Lasing in metallic-coated nanocavities,” Nat. Photonics 1(10), 589–594 (2007). [CrossRef]
16.	M. P. Nezhad, A. Simic, O. Bondarenko, B. Slutsky, A. Mizrahi, L. Feng, V. Lomakin, and Y. Fainman, “Room-temperature subwavelength metallo-dielectric lasers,” Nat. Photonics 4(6), 395–399 (2010). [CrossRef]
17.	M. I. Stockman, “The spaser as a nanoscale quantum generator and ultrafast amplifier,” J. Opt. 12(2), 024004 (2010). [CrossRef]
18.	J. K. Kitur, V. A. Podolskiy, and M. A. Noginov, “Stimulated emission of surface plasmon polaritons in a microcylinder cavity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106(18), 183903 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
19.	I. I. Smolyaninov, C. H. Lee, and C. C. Davis, “Giant enhancement of surface second harmonic generation in BaTiO3 due to photorefractive surface wave excitation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83(12), 2429–2432 (1999). [CrossRef]
20.	G. A. Wurtz and A. V. Zayats, “Nonlinear surface plasmon polaritonic crystals,” Laser Photonics Rev. 2(3), 125–135 (2008). [CrossRef]
21.	P. Ginzburg, A. Hayat, N. Berkovitch, and M. Orenstein, “Nonlocal ponderomotive nonlinearity in plasmonics,” Opt. Lett. 35(10), 1551–1553 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
22.	J. B. Khurgin, G. Sun, and R. A. Soref, “Enhancement of luminescence efficiency using surface plasmon polaritons: figures of merit,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 24(8), 1968–1980 (2007). [CrossRef]
23.	A. V. Kildishev, W. Cai, U. K. Chettiar, and V. M. Shalaev, “Transformation optics: approaching broadband electromagnetic cloaking,” New J. Phys. 10(11), 115029 (2008). [CrossRef]
24.	S. A. Maier, Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications, New York, Springer, 2007.
25.	E. Prodan, C. Radloff, N. J. Halas, and P. Nordlander, “A hybridization model for the plasmon response of complex nanostructures,” Science 302(5644), 419–422 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
26.	I. D. Mayergoyz, D. R. Fredkin, and Z. Zhang, “Electrostatic (plasmon) resonances in nanoparticles,” Phys. Rev. B 72(15), 155412 (2005). [CrossRef]
27.	P. Nordlander, C. Oubre, E. Prodan, K. Li, and M. Stockman, “Plasmon hybridization in nanoparticle dimers,” Nano Lett. 4(5), 899–903 (2004). [CrossRef]
28.	B. N. Khlebtsov and N. G. Khlebtsov, “Multipole plasmons in metal nanorods: scaling properties and dependence on particle size, shape, orientation, and dielectric environment,” J. Phys. Chem. C 111(31), 11516–11527 (2007). [CrossRef]
29.	N. Berkovitch, P. Ginzburg, and M. Orenstein, “Concave plasmonic particles: broad-band geometrical tunability in the near-infrared,” Nano Lett. 10(4), 1405–1408 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
30.	P. Ginzburg, N. Berkovitch, A. Nevet, I. Shor, and M. Orenstein, “Resonances on-demand for plasmonic nano-particles,” Nano Lett. 11(6), 2329–2333 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
31.	A. Alù and N. Engheta, “Guided propagation along quadrupolar chains of plasmonic nanoparticles,” Phys. Rev. B 79(23), 235412 (2009). [CrossRef]
32.	M. Liu, T. W. Lee, S. K. Gray, P. Guyot-Sionnest, and M. Pelton, “Excitation of dark plasmons in metal nanoparticles by a localized emitter,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102(10), 107401 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
33.	M. W. Chu, V. Myroshnychenko, C. H. Chen, J. P. Deng, C. Y. Mou, and F. J. García de Abajo, “Probing bright and dark surface-plasmon modes in individual and coupled noble metal nanoparticles using an electron beam,” Nano Lett. 9(1), 399–404 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
34.	I. D. Mayergoyz, Z. Zhang, and G. Miano, “Analysis of dynamics of excitation and dephasing of plasmon resonance modes in nanoparticles,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98(14), 147401 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
35.	L. Fonda, G. C. Ghirardi, and A. Rimini, “Decay theory of unstable quantum systems,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 41(4), 587–631 (1978). [CrossRef]
36.	J. Seke and W. N. Herfort, “Deviations from exponential decay in the case of spontaneous emission from a two-level atom,” Phys. Rev. A 38(2), 833–840 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
37.	C. Cao, J. Tian, and H. Cao, “Non-Markovian correlation function and direct analysis of spontaneous emission of an excited two-level atom,” Phys. Lett. A 303(5-6), 318–327 (2002). [CrossRef]
38.	J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (Wiley, New York, 1999), 3rd ed.
39.	M. I. Stockman, “Nanoplasmonics: past, present, and glimpse into future,” Opt. Express 19(22), 22029–22106 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
40.	R. Loudon, “The propagation of electromagnetic energy through an absorbing dielectric,” J. Phys. A 3(3), 233–245 (1970). [CrossRef]
41.	E. Feigenbaum and M. Orenstein, “Ultrasmall volume plasmons, yet with complete retardation effects,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101(16), 163902 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
42.	N. A. R. Bhat and J. E. Sipe, “Hamiltonian treatment of the electromagnetic field in dispersive and absorptive structured media,” Phys. Rev. A 73(6), 063808 (2006). [CrossRef]
43.	M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cambridge 1997).
44.	P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy, “Optical constants of the noble metals,” Phys. Rev. B 6(12), 4370–4379 (1972). [CrossRef]
45.	I. I. Smolyaninov, “Quantum fluctuations of the refractive index near the interface between a metal and a nonlinear dielectric,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94(5), 057403 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
46.	J. Zuloaga, E. Prodan, and P. Nordlander, “Quantum plasmonics: optical properties and tunability of metallic nanorods,” ACS Nano 4(9), 5269–5276 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
47.	C. Benkert, M. O. Scully, and G. Süssmann, “Memory correlation effects on quantum noise in lasers and masers,” Phys. Rev. A 41(11), 6119–6128 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

OCIS Codes
(240.6680) Optics at surfaces : Surface plasmons
(270.5580) Quantum optics : Quantum electrodynamics

ToC Category:
Optics at Surfaces

History
Original Manuscript: January 19, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: February 17, 2012
Published: March 7, 2012

Virtual Issues
Vol. 7, Iss. 5 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Pavel Ginzburg and Anatoly V. Zayats, "Non-exponential decay of dark localized surface plasmons," Opt. Express 20, 6720-6727 (2012)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/vjbo/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-20-6-6720

Sort: Author | Year | Journal | Reset

References

E. M. Purcell, “Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies,” Phys. Rev.69, 681 (1946).
P. Lodahl, A. Floris Van Driel, I. S. Nikolaev, A. Irman, K. Overgaag, D. Vanmaekelbergh, and W. L. Vos, “Controlling the dynamics of spontaneous emission from quantum dots by photonic crystals,” Nature430(7000), 654–657 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
J. M. Gérard, D. Barrier, J. Y. Marzin, R. Kuszelewicz, L. Manin, E. Costard, V. Thierry‐Mieg, and T. Rivera, “Quantum boxes as active probes for photonic microstructures: the pillar microcavity case,” Appl. Phys. Lett.69(4), 449–451 (1996). [CrossRef]
D. K. Armani, T. J. Kippenberg, S. M. Spillane, and K. J. Vahala, “Ultra-high-Q toroid microcavity on a chip,” Nature421(6926), 925–928 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
L. A. Blanco and F. J. García de Abajo, “Spontaneous light emission in complex nanostructures,” Phys. Rev. B69(20), 205414 (2004). [CrossRef]
Z. Jacob, I. Smolyaninov, and E. Narimanov, “Broadband Purcell effect: radiative decay engineering with metamaterials,” e-print arXiv:0910.3981.
Z. Jacob, J. Kim, G. V. Naik, A. Boltasseva, E. E. Narimanov, and V. M. Shalaev, “Engineering photonic density of states using metamaterials,” Appl. Phys. B100(1), 215–218 (2010). [CrossRef]
K. Tanaka, E. Plum, J. Y. Ou, T. Uchino, and N. I. Zheludev, “Multifold enhancement of quantum dot luminescence in plasmonic metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. Lett.105(22), 227403 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
A. N. Poddubny, P. A. Belov, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Spontaneous radiation of a finite-size dipole emitter in hyperbolic media,” Phys. Rev. A84(2), 023807 (2011). [CrossRef]
A. Alù and N. Engheta, “Cloaking a sensor,” Phys. Rev. Lett.102(23), 233901 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
A. V. Kabashin, P. Evans, S. Pastkovsky, W. Hendren, G. A. Wurtz, R. Atkinson, R. Pollard, V. A. Podolskiy, and A. V. Zayats, “Plasmonic nanorod metamaterials for biosensing,” Nat. Mater.8(11), 867–871 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
M. L. Juan, M. Righini, and R. Quidant, “Plasmon nano-optical tweezers,” Nat. Photonics5(6), 349–356 (2011). [CrossRef]
C. Loo, A. Lowery, N. Halas, J. West, and R. Drezek, “Immunotargeted nanoshells for integrated cancer imaging and therapy,” Nano Lett.5(4), 709–711 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
R. F. Oulton, V. J. Sorger, T. Zentgraf, R. M. Ma, C. Gladden, L. Dai, G. Bartal, and X. Zhang, “Plasmon lasers at deep subwavelength scale,” Nature461(7264), 629–632 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
M. T. Hill, Y.-S. Oei, B. Smalbrugge, Y. Zhu, T. de Vries, P. J. van Veldhoven, F. W. M. van Otten, T. J. Eijkemans, J. P. Turkiewicz, H. de Waardt, E. J. Geluk, S.-H. Kwon, Y.-H. Lee, R. Nötzel, and M. K. Smit, “Lasing in metallic-coated nanocavities,” Nat. Photonics1(10), 589–594 (2007). [CrossRef]
M. P. Nezhad, A. Simic, O. Bondarenko, B. Slutsky, A. Mizrahi, L. Feng, V. Lomakin, and Y. Fainman, “Room-temperature subwavelength metallo-dielectric lasers,” Nat. Photonics4(6), 395–399 (2010). [CrossRef]
M. I. Stockman, “The spaser as a nanoscale quantum generator and ultrafast amplifier,” J. Opt.12(2), 024004 (2010). [CrossRef]
J. K. Kitur, V. A. Podolskiy, and M. A. Noginov, “Stimulated emission of surface plasmon polaritons in a microcylinder cavity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.106(18), 183903 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
I. I. Smolyaninov, C. H. Lee, and C. C. Davis, “Giant enhancement of surface second harmonic generation in BaTiO3 due to photorefractive surface wave excitation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.83(12), 2429–2432 (1999). [CrossRef]
G. A. Wurtz and A. V. Zayats, “Nonlinear surface plasmon polaritonic crystals,” Laser Photonics Rev.2(3), 125–135 (2008). [CrossRef]
P. Ginzburg, A. Hayat, N. Berkovitch, and M. Orenstein, “Nonlocal ponderomotive nonlinearity in plasmonics,” Opt. Lett.35(10), 1551–1553 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
J. B. Khurgin, G. Sun, and R. A. Soref, “Enhancement of luminescence efficiency using surface plasmon polaritons: figures of merit,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B24(8), 1968–1980 (2007). [CrossRef]
A. V. Kildishev, W. Cai, U. K. Chettiar, and V. M. Shalaev, “Transformation optics: approaching broadband electromagnetic cloaking,” New J. Phys.10(11), 115029 (2008). [CrossRef]
S. A. Maier, Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications, New York, Springer, 2007.
E. Prodan, C. Radloff, N. J. Halas, and P. Nordlander, “A hybridization model for the plasmon response of complex nanostructures,” Science302(5644), 419–422 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
I. D. Mayergoyz, D. R. Fredkin, and Z. Zhang, “Electrostatic (plasmon) resonances in nanoparticles,” Phys. Rev. B72(15), 155412 (2005). [CrossRef]
P. Nordlander, C. Oubre, E. Prodan, K. Li, and M. Stockman, “Plasmon hybridization in nanoparticle dimers,” Nano Lett.4(5), 899–903 (2004). [CrossRef]
B. N. Khlebtsov and N. G. Khlebtsov, “Multipole plasmons in metal nanorods: scaling properties and dependence on particle size, shape, orientation, and dielectric environment,” J. Phys. Chem. C111(31), 11516–11527 (2007). [CrossRef]
N. Berkovitch, P. Ginzburg, and M. Orenstein, “Concave plasmonic particles: broad-band geometrical tunability in the near-infrared,” Nano Lett.10(4), 1405–1408 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
P. Ginzburg, N. Berkovitch, A. Nevet, I. Shor, and M. Orenstein, “Resonances on-demand for plasmonic nano-particles,” Nano Lett.11(6), 2329–2333 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
A. Alù and N. Engheta, “Guided propagation along quadrupolar chains of plasmonic nanoparticles,” Phys. Rev. B79(23), 235412 (2009). [CrossRef]
M. Liu, T. W. Lee, S. K. Gray, P. Guyot-Sionnest, and M. Pelton, “Excitation of dark plasmons in metal nanoparticles by a localized emitter,” Phys. Rev. Lett.102(10), 107401 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
M. W. Chu, V. Myroshnychenko, C. H. Chen, J. P. Deng, C. Y. Mou, and F. J. García de Abajo, “Probing bright and dark surface-plasmon modes in individual and coupled noble metal nanoparticles using an electron beam,” Nano Lett.9(1), 399–404 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
I. D. Mayergoyz, Z. Zhang, and G. Miano, “Analysis of dynamics of excitation and dephasing of plasmon resonance modes in nanoparticles,” Phys. Rev. Lett.98(14), 147401 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
L. Fonda, G. C. Ghirardi, and A. Rimini, “Decay theory of unstable quantum systems,” Rep. Prog. Phys.41(4), 587–631 (1978). [CrossRef]
J. Seke and W. N. Herfort, “Deviations from exponential decay in the case of spontaneous emission from a two-level atom,” Phys. Rev. A38(2), 833–840 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
C. Cao, J. Tian, and H. Cao, “Non-Markovian correlation function and direct analysis of spontaneous emission of an excited two-level atom,” Phys. Lett. A303(5-6), 318–327 (2002). [CrossRef]
J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (Wiley, New York, 1999), 3rd ed.
M. I. Stockman, “Nanoplasmonics: past, present, and glimpse into future,” Opt. Express19(22), 22029–22106 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
R. Loudon, “The propagation of electromagnetic energy through an absorbing dielectric,” J. Phys. A3(3), 233–245 (1970). [CrossRef]
E. Feigenbaum and M. Orenstein, “Ultrasmall volume plasmons, yet with complete retardation effects,” Phys. Rev. Lett.101(16), 163902 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
N. A. R. Bhat and J. E. Sipe, “Hamiltonian treatment of the electromagnetic field in dispersive and absorptive structured media,” Phys. Rev. A73(6), 063808 (2006). [CrossRef]
M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cambridge 1997).
P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy, “Optical constants of the noble metals,” Phys. Rev. B6(12), 4370–4379 (1972). [CrossRef]
I. I. Smolyaninov, “Quantum fluctuations of the refractive index near the interface between a metal and a nonlinear dielectric,” Phys. Rev. Lett.94(5), 057403 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
J. Zuloaga, E. Prodan, and P. Nordlander, “Quantum plasmonics: optical properties and tunability of metallic nanorods,” ACS Nano4(9), 5269–5276 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
C. Benkert, M. O. Scully, and G. Süssmann, “Memory correlation effects on quantum noise in lasers and masers,” Phys. Rev. A41(11), 6119–6128 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Alù, A.
Armani, D. K.
Atkinson, R.
Barrier, D.
Bartal, G.
Belov, P. A.
Benkert, C.
Berkovitch, N.
Bhat, N. A. R.
Blanco, L. A.
Boltasseva, A.
Bondarenko, O.
Cai, W.
Cao, C.
Cao, H.
Chen, C. H.
Chettiar, U. K.
Christy, R. W.
Chu, M. W.
Costard, E.
Dai, L.
Davis, C. C.
de Vries, T.
de Waardt, H.
Deng, J. P.
Drezek, R.
Eijkemans, T. J.
Engheta, N.
Evans, P.
Fainman, Y.
Feigenbaum, E.
Feng, L.
Floris Van Driel, A.
Fonda, L.
Fredkin, D. R.
García de Abajo, F. J.
Geluk, E. J.
Gérard, J. M.
Ghirardi, G. C.
Ginzburg, P.
Gladden, C.
Gray, S. K.
Guyot-Sionnest, P.
Halas, N.
Halas, N. J.
Hayat, A.
Hendren, W.
Herfort, W. N.
Hill, M. T.
Irman, A.
Jacob, Z.
Johnson, P. B.
Juan, M. L.
Kabashin, A. V.
Khlebtsov, B. N.
Khlebtsov, N. G.
Khurgin, J. B.
Kildishev, A. V.
Kim, J.
Kippenberg, T. J.
Kitur, J. K.
Kivshar, Y. S.
Kuszelewicz, R.
Kwon, S.-H.
Lee, C. H.
Lee, T. W.
Lee, Y.-H.
Li, K.
Liu, M.
Lodahl, P.
Lomakin, V.
Loo, C.
Loudon, R.
Lowery, A.
Ma, R. M.
Manin, L.
Marzin, J. Y.
Mayergoyz, I. D.
Miano, G.
Mizrahi, A.
Mou, C. Y.
Myroshnychenko, V.
Naik, G. V.
Narimanov, E. E.
Nevet, A.
Nezhad, M. P.
Nikolaev, I. S.
Noginov, M. A.
Nordlander, P.
Nötzel, R.
Oei, Y.-S.
Orenstein, M.
Ou, J. Y.
Oubre, C.
Oulton, R. F.
Overgaag, K.
Pastkovsky, S.
Pelton, M.
Plum, E.
Poddubny, A. N.
Podolskiy, V. A.
Pollard, R.
Prodan, E.
Purcell, E. M.
Quidant, R.
Radloff, C.
Righini, M.
Rimini, A.
Rivera, T.
Scully, M. O.
Seke, J.
Shalaev, V. M.
Shor, I.
Simic, A.
Sipe, J. E.
Slutsky, B.
Smalbrugge, B.
Smit, M. K.
Smolyaninov, I. I.
Soref, R. A.
Sorger, V. J.
Spillane, S. M.
Stockman, M.
Stockman, M. I.
Sun, G.
Süssmann, G.
Tanaka, K.
Thierry-Mieg, V.
Tian, J.
Turkiewicz, J. P.
Uchino, T.
Vahala, K. J.
van Otten, F. W. M.
van Veldhoven, P. J.
Vanmaekelbergh, D.
Vos, W. L.
West, J.
Wurtz, G. A.
Zayats, A. V.
Zentgraf, T.
Zhang, X.
Zhang, Z.
Zheludev, N. I.
Zhu, Y.
Zuloaga, J.

ACS Nano

J. Zuloaga, E. Prodan, and P. Nordlander, “Quantum plasmonics: optical properties and tunability of metallic nanorods,” ACS Nano4(9), 5269–5276 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Appl. Phys. B

Z. Jacob, J. Kim, G. V. Naik, A. Boltasseva, E. E. Narimanov, and V. M. Shalaev, “Engineering photonic density of states using metamaterials,” Appl. Phys. B100(1), 215–218 (2010). [CrossRef]

Appl. Phys. Lett.

J. M. Gérard, D. Barrier, J. Y. Marzin, R. Kuszelewicz, L. Manin, E. Costard, V. Thierry‐Mieg, and T. Rivera, “Quantum boxes as active probes for photonic microstructures: the pillar microcavity case,” Appl. Phys. Lett.69(4), 449–451 (1996). [CrossRef]

J. Opt.

M. I. Stockman, “The spaser as a nanoscale quantum generator and ultrafast amplifier,” J. Opt.12(2), 024004 (2010). [CrossRef]

J. Opt. Soc. Am. B

J. B. Khurgin, G. Sun, and R. A. Soref, “Enhancement of luminescence efficiency using surface plasmon polaritons: figures of merit,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B24(8), 1968–1980 (2007). [CrossRef]

J. Phys. A

R. Loudon, “The propagation of electromagnetic energy through an absorbing dielectric,” J. Phys. A3(3), 233–245 (1970). [CrossRef]

J. Phys. Chem. C

B. N. Khlebtsov and N. G. Khlebtsov, “Multipole plasmons in metal nanorods: scaling properties and dependence on particle size, shape, orientation, and dielectric environment,” J. Phys. Chem. C111(31), 11516–11527 (2007). [CrossRef]

Laser Photonics Rev.

G. A. Wurtz and A. V. Zayats, “Nonlinear surface plasmon polaritonic crystals,” Laser Photonics Rev.2(3), 125–135 (2008). [CrossRef]

Nano Lett.

N. Berkovitch, P. Ginzburg, and M. Orenstein, “Concave plasmonic particles: broad-band geometrical tunability in the near-infrared,” Nano Lett.10(4), 1405–1408 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
P. Ginzburg, N. Berkovitch, A. Nevet, I. Shor, and M. Orenstein, “Resonances on-demand for plasmonic nano-particles,” Nano Lett.11(6), 2329–2333 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
M. W. Chu, V. Myroshnychenko, C. H. Chen, J. P. Deng, C. Y. Mou, and F. J. García de Abajo, “Probing bright and dark surface-plasmon modes in individual and coupled noble metal nanoparticles using an electron beam,” Nano Lett.9(1), 399–404 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
P. Nordlander, C. Oubre, E. Prodan, K. Li, and M. Stockman, “Plasmon hybridization in nanoparticle dimers,” Nano Lett.4(5), 899–903 (2004). [CrossRef]
C. Loo, A. Lowery, N. Halas, J. West, and R. Drezek, “Immunotargeted nanoshells for integrated cancer imaging and therapy,” Nano Lett.5(4), 709–711 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Nat. Mater.

A. V. Kabashin, P. Evans, S. Pastkovsky, W. Hendren, G. A. Wurtz, R. Atkinson, R. Pollard, V. A. Podolskiy, and A. V. Zayats, “Plasmonic nanorod metamaterials for biosensing,” Nat. Mater.8(11), 867–871 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Nat. Photonics

M. L. Juan, M. Righini, and R. Quidant, “Plasmon nano-optical tweezers,” Nat. Photonics5(6), 349–356 (2011). [CrossRef]
M. T. Hill, Y.-S. Oei, B. Smalbrugge, Y. Zhu, T. de Vries, P. J. van Veldhoven, F. W. M. van Otten, T. J. Eijkemans, J. P. Turkiewicz, H. de Waardt, E. J. Geluk, S.-H. Kwon, Y.-H. Lee, R. Nötzel, and M. K. Smit, “Lasing in metallic-coated nanocavities,” Nat. Photonics1(10), 589–594 (2007). [CrossRef]
M. P. Nezhad, A. Simic, O. Bondarenko, B. Slutsky, A. Mizrahi, L. Feng, V. Lomakin, and Y. Fainman, “Room-temperature subwavelength metallo-dielectric lasers,” Nat. Photonics4(6), 395–399 (2010). [CrossRef]

Nature

R. F. Oulton, V. J. Sorger, T. Zentgraf, R. M. Ma, C. Gladden, L. Dai, G. Bartal, and X. Zhang, “Plasmon lasers at deep subwavelength scale,” Nature461(7264), 629–632 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
D. K. Armani, T. J. Kippenberg, S. M. Spillane, and K. J. Vahala, “Ultra-high-Q toroid microcavity on a chip,” Nature421(6926), 925–928 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
P. Lodahl, A. Floris Van Driel, I. S. Nikolaev, A. Irman, K. Overgaag, D. Vanmaekelbergh, and W. L. Vos, “Controlling the dynamics of spontaneous emission from quantum dots by photonic crystals,” Nature430(7000), 654–657 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

New J. Phys.

A. V. Kildishev, W. Cai, U. K. Chettiar, and V. M. Shalaev, “Transformation optics: approaching broadband electromagnetic cloaking,” New J. Phys.10(11), 115029 (2008). [CrossRef]

Opt. Express

M. I. Stockman, “Nanoplasmonics: past, present, and glimpse into future,” Opt. Express19(22), 22029–22106 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Opt. Lett.

P. Ginzburg, A. Hayat, N. Berkovitch, and M. Orenstein, “Nonlocal ponderomotive nonlinearity in plasmonics,” Opt. Lett.35(10), 1551–1553 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Phys. Lett. A

C. Cao, J. Tian, and H. Cao, “Non-Markovian correlation function and direct analysis of spontaneous emission of an excited two-level atom,” Phys. Lett. A303(5-6), 318–327 (2002). [CrossRef]

Phys. Rev.

E. M. Purcell, “Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies,” Phys. Rev.69, 681 (1946).

Phys. Rev. A

A. N. Poddubny, P. A. Belov, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Spontaneous radiation of a finite-size dipole emitter in hyperbolic media,” Phys. Rev. A84(2), 023807 (2011). [CrossRef]
J. Seke and W. N. Herfort, “Deviations from exponential decay in the case of spontaneous emission from a two-level atom,” Phys. Rev. A38(2), 833–840 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
N. A. R. Bhat and J. E. Sipe, “Hamiltonian treatment of the electromagnetic field in dispersive and absorptive structured media,” Phys. Rev. A73(6), 063808 (2006). [CrossRef]
C. Benkert, M. O. Scully, and G. Süssmann, “Memory correlation effects on quantum noise in lasers and masers,” Phys. Rev. A41(11), 6119–6128 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Phys. Rev. B

P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy, “Optical constants of the noble metals,” Phys. Rev. B6(12), 4370–4379 (1972). [CrossRef]
A. Alù and N. Engheta, “Guided propagation along quadrupolar chains of plasmonic nanoparticles,” Phys. Rev. B79(23), 235412 (2009). [CrossRef]
I. D. Mayergoyz, D. R. Fredkin, and Z. Zhang, “Electrostatic (plasmon) resonances in nanoparticles,” Phys. Rev. B72(15), 155412 (2005). [CrossRef]
L. A. Blanco and F. J. García de Abajo, “Spontaneous light emission in complex nanostructures,” Phys. Rev. B69(20), 205414 (2004). [CrossRef]

Phys. Rev. Lett.

K. Tanaka, E. Plum, J. Y. Ou, T. Uchino, and N. I. Zheludev, “Multifold enhancement of quantum dot luminescence in plasmonic metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. Lett.105(22), 227403 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
A. Alù and N. Engheta, “Cloaking a sensor,” Phys. Rev. Lett.102(23), 233901 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
J. K. Kitur, V. A. Podolskiy, and M. A. Noginov, “Stimulated emission of surface plasmon polaritons in a microcylinder cavity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.106(18), 183903 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
I. I. Smolyaninov, C. H. Lee, and C. C. Davis, “Giant enhancement of surface second harmonic generation in BaTiO3 due to photorefractive surface wave excitation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.83(12), 2429–2432 (1999). [CrossRef]
M. Liu, T. W. Lee, S. K. Gray, P. Guyot-Sionnest, and M. Pelton, “Excitation of dark plasmons in metal nanoparticles by a localized emitter,” Phys. Rev. Lett.102(10), 107401 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
I. D. Mayergoyz, Z. Zhang, and G. Miano, “Analysis of dynamics of excitation and dephasing of plasmon resonance modes in nanoparticles,” Phys. Rev. Lett.98(14), 147401 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
I. I. Smolyaninov, “Quantum fluctuations of the refractive index near the interface between a metal and a nonlinear dielectric,” Phys. Rev. Lett.94(5), 057403 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
E. Feigenbaum and M. Orenstein, “Ultrasmall volume plasmons, yet with complete retardation effects,” Phys. Rev. Lett.101(16), 163902 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Rep. Prog. Phys.

L. Fonda, G. C. Ghirardi, and A. Rimini, “Decay theory of unstable quantum systems,” Rep. Prog. Phys.41(4), 587–631 (1978). [CrossRef]

Science

E. Prodan, C. Radloff, N. J. Halas, and P. Nordlander, “A hybridization model for the plasmon response of complex nanostructures,” Science302(5644), 419–422 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Other

S. A. Maier, Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications, New York, Springer, 2007.
Z. Jacob, I. Smolyaninov, and E. Narimanov, “Broadband Purcell effect: radiative decay engineering with metamaterials,” e-print arXiv:0910.3981.
J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (Wiley, New York, 1999), 3rd ed.
M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cambridge 1997).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Click here to see a list of articles that cite this paper

Figures


Fig. 1	Fig. 2	Fig. 3

« Previous Article | Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

OpticsInfoBase

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

| EXPLORING THE INTERFACE OF LIGHT AND BIOMEDICINE

Non-exponential decay of dark localized surface plasmons

Article Tools

Article Navigation

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Exponential versus non-exponential decay laws

3. Theoretical model of the non-exponential decay law

4. Discussion

5. Conclusion

Acknowledgments

References and links

References

ACS Nano

Appl. Phys. B

Appl. Phys. Lett.

J. Opt.

J. Opt. Soc. Am. B

J. Phys. A

J. Phys. Chem. C

Laser Photonics Rev.

Nano Lett.

Nat. Mater.

Nat. Photonics

Nature

New J. Phys.

Opt. Express

Opt. Lett.

Phys. Lett. A

Phys. Rev.

Phys. Rev. A

Phys. Rev. B

Phys. Rev. Lett.

Rep. Prog. Phys.

Science

Other

Cited By

Figures

Select a Conference
Session or Paper #
Year