OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America B

Journal of the Optical Society of America B

| OPTICAL PHYSICS

  • Editor: Henry van Driel
  • Vol. 29, Iss. 8 — Aug. 1, 2012
  • pp: 2066–2073

Algorithm for finding clusters with a known distribution and its application to photon-number resolution using a superconducting transition-edge sensor

Zachary H. Levine, Thomas Gerrits, Alan L. Migdall, Daniel V. Samarov, Brice Calkins, Adriana E. Lita, and Sae Woo Nam  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA B, Vol. 29, Issue 8, pp. 2066-2073 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.29.002066


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (393 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Improving photon-number resolution of single-photon sensitive detectors is important for many applications, as is extending the range of such detectors. Here we seek improved resolution for a particular superconducting transition-edge sensor (TES) through better processing of the TES output waveforms. With that aim, two algorithms to extract number resolution from TES output waveforms are compared. The comparison is done by processing waveform data sets from a TES illuminated at nine illumination levels by a pulsed laser at 1550 nm. The algorithms are used to sort the individual output waveforms and then create clusters associated with individual photon numbers. The first uses a dot product with the waveform mean (for each illumination level), while the second uses K-means clustering modified to include knowledge of the Poisson distribution. The first algorithm is shown to distinguish adjacent peaks associated with photon numbers up to 19, whereas the second algorithm distinguishes photon numbers up to 23, using the same data.

OCIS Codes
(040.5570) Detectors : Quantum detectors
(120.5630) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Radiometry

ToC Category:
Detectors

History
Original Manuscript: May 8, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: June 21, 2012
Published: July 20, 2012

Citation
Zachary H. Levine, Thomas Gerrits, Alan L. Migdall, Daniel V. Samarov, Brice Calkins, Adriana E. Lita, and Sae Woo Nam, "Algorithm for finding clusters with a known distribution and its application to photon-number resolution using a superconducting transition-edge sensor," J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 29, 2066-2073 (2012)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josab/abstract.cfm?URI=josab-29-8-2066


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. A. Migdall, “Differences explained in correlated-photon metrology techniques,” Phys. Today 52, 41–46 (1999). [CrossRef]
  2. A. P. Worsley, H. B. Coldenstrodt-Ronge, J. S. Lundeen, P. J. Mosley, B. J. Smith, G. Puentes, N. Thomas-Peter, and I. A. Walmsley, “Absolute efficiency estimation of photon-number-resolving detectors using twin beams,” Opt. Express 17, 4397–4411 (2009). [CrossRef]
  3. A. R. Beaumont, J. Y. Cheung, C. J. Chunnilall, J. Ireland, and M. G. White, “Providing reference standards and metrology for the few photon counting community,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 610, 183–187 (2009). [CrossRef]
  4. J. C. Zwinkels, E. Ikonen, N. P. Fox, G. Ulm, and M. L. Rastello, “Photometry, radiometry and ‘the candela’: evolution in the classical and quantum world,” Metrologia 47, R15–R32 (2010). [CrossRef]
  5. R. Klein, R. Thornagel, and G. Ulm, “From single photons to milliwatt radiant power in electron storage rings as radiation sources with a high dynamic range,” Metrologia 47, R33–R40 (2010). [CrossRef]
  6. H. J. Briegel, W. Dur, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, “Quantum repeaters: the role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5932–5935 (1998). [CrossRef]
  7. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, “A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics,” Nature 409, 46–52 (2001). [CrossRef]
  8. S. Dolinar, “An optimum receiver for the binary coherent state quantum channel,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology Research Laboratory of Electronics Quarterly Progress Report, Vol. 111, 115–120 (1973).
  9. C. Wittmann, M. Takeoka, K. N. Cassemiro, M. Sasaki, G. Leuchs, and U. L. Andersen, “Demonstration of near-optimal discrimination of optical coherent states,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 210501 (2008). [CrossRef]
  10. F. E. Becerra, J. Fan, G. Baumgartner, S. V. Polyakov, J. Goldhar, J. T. Kosloski, and A. Migdall, “M-ary-state phase-shift-keying discrimination below the homodyne limit,” Phys. Rev. A 84, 062324 (2011). [CrossRef]
  11. S. V. Polyakov, A. Migdall, and S. W. Nam, “Real-time data-acquisition platform for pulsed measurements,” in Advances in Quantum Theory, AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1327 (Växjö, 2010), pp. 505–519.
  12. While always keeping in mind that this correspondence is never 100% assured, we refer to these as photon-number peaks.
  13. M. Mehmet, A. Ast, T. Eberle, S. Steinlechner, H. Vahlbruch, and R. Schnabel, “Squeezed light at 1550 nm with a quantum noise reduction of 12.3 dB,” Opt. Express 19, 25763–25772 (2011). [CrossRef]
  14. A. J. Miller, S. W. Nam, J. M. Martin, and A. V. Sergienko, “Demonstration of a low-noise near-infrared photon counter with multiphoton discrimination,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 791–793 (2003). [CrossRef]
  15. M. Fujiwara and M. Sasaki, “Direct measurement of photon number statistics at telecom wavelengths using a charge integration photon detector,” Appl. Opt. 46, 3069–3074 (2007). [CrossRef]
  16. P. Buzhan, B. Dolgoshein, A. Ilyin, V. Kaplin, S. Klemin, R. Mirzoyan, E. Popova, and M. Teshima, “The cross-talk problem in SiPMs and their use as light sensors for imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 610, 131–134 (2009). [CrossRef]
  17. R. H. Hadfield, “Single-photon detectors for optical quantum information applications,” Nat. Photon. 3, 696–705 (2009). [CrossRef]
  18. M. D. Eisaman, J. Fan, A. Migdall, and S. V. Polyakov, “Single-photon source and detectors,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 071101 (2011). [CrossRef]
  19. D. Fukuda, G. Fujii, T. Numata, K. Amemiya, A. Yoshizawa, H. Tsuchida, H. Fujino, H. Ishii, T. Itatani, S. Inoue, and T. Zama, “Titanium-based transition-edge photon number resolving detector with 98 percent detection efficiency with index-matched small-gap fiber coupling,” Opt. Express 19, 870–875 (2011). [CrossRef]
  20. A. E. Lita, A. J. Miller, and S. W. Nam, “Counting near-infrared single-photons with 95% efficiency,” Opt. Express 16, 3032–3040 (2008). [CrossRef]
  21. C. Ding and X. He, “K-means clustering via principal component analysis,” in ICML Proceedings 21st International Conference on Machine Learning (Assoc. Comp. Mach., 2004), pp. 1–9.
  22. G. Hamerly and C. Elkan, “Alternatives to the k-means algorithm that find better clusterings,” in Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (ACM, 2002), CIKM ’02, pp. 600–607.
  23. W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vettenberg, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes, 3rd ed. (Cambridge University, 2007), Sections 13.3 and 16.1.
  24. T. Gerrits, B. Calkins, N. Tomlin, A. E. Lita, A. Migdall, S. W. Nam, and R. Mirin, “Extending single-photon optimized superconducting transition edge sensors beyond the single-photon counting regime,” presented at the Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference (2012).
  25. L. Cai, H. Y. Huang, S. Blackshaw, J. S. Liu, C. Cepko, and W. H. Wong, “Clustering analysis of SAGE data using a Poisson approach,” Genome Biol. 5, R51.1 (2004). [CrossRef]
  26. P. E. Black, “Greedy algorithm,” in Dictionary of Algorithms and Data Structures [online], P. E. Black, ed., U. S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (2February2005) (accessed March 5, 2012). Available from http://www.nist.gov/dads/HTML/greedyalgo.html .
  27. S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi, “Optimization by simulated annealing,” Science 220, 671–680 (1983). [CrossRef]
  28. D. J. Fixsen, S. H. Moseley, B. Cabrera, and E. Figueroa-Feliciano, “Pulse estimation in nonlinear detectors with nonstationary noise,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 520, 555–558 (2004). [CrossRef]
  29. Curves were classified as containing background photons if the initial or final voltage was above 16.8 mV, or if there was a peak of at least 16.8 mV after a time of 3.4 μs. The number of curves removed was consistent with the background rate given above.
  30. The mention of commercial products does not imply endorsement by the authors’ institutions nor does it imply that they are the best available for the purpose.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited